ext_28932 (
zgirl714.livejournal.com) wrote in
lkh_lashouts2006-10-20 03:22 pm
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
Comment From A LKH Fangirl
Um. Snotty, much? Jeez. How many best-sellers and devoted fans do you have? Hmmm. Let me guess. None? Good grief. The arrogance of youth is just astonishing. Once you’ve got over a dozen books on international best-seller lists then feel free to critique your heart out. But this is clearly a case of "Those who can, do. But those who can’t, sit around and b*tch about those who do." Ms. Hamilton’s stories remain cutting edge. And if you did a random check of the top 50 books on the NYT List, you’d find typos galore. It’s certainly not limited to laurell K. Hamilton novels. Reading is about pleasuring the mind, not hunting down misplaced punctuation. If it causes an emotional repsonse, then it’s a success. Hyper-focusing and being "nit-picky" is ridiculous. Go write the kind of literary perfection you so obviously expect and then come back and trash talk Ms. Hamilton.
That is the comment from Elizabeth on this post.
That is the comment from Elizabeth on this post.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Funny how they never ask for the professional credentials from all the drooling sycophants who offer up nothing but glowing, ass-kissing praise about Hamilton's self-indulgent drivel.
Hyper-focusing and nitpicking is exactly what a good editor does. Being a published name is the only thing keeping Hamilton's current work out of the "slush pile".