ext_34167 (
tsubaki-ny.livejournal.com) wrote in
lkh_lashouts2007-05-17 12:40 pm
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
(no subject)
First post. I'm not well-read in the Anitaverse at all (read one, skimmed others, read the comic, seen lots of excerpts and reviews), and so I've hesitated joining the com, or saying anything too mean (I'll probably continue hesitating on that one), based on, well, my scanty qualifications.
Still, I read something today that was rather like a lightning strike, and I wanted to share. (I've Googled to see if it's shown up in this community before, and I can't find it.) It's an old blog entry by Kit Whitfield (an author I first heard of in this com) on a permutation of the Mary Sue -- the "Snappy Sue."
The fit is so apt it's kinda scary, I think.
Writes Whitfield (naming no names):
"A variant of Mary Sue becoming increasingly common in female-written and -marketed fantasy fiction. Snappy Sue is an empowered chick, generally urban and frequently in her twenties or older, who's respected/admired/worshipped for being a Strong Woman. Unfortunately, the author continually asserts her strength by giving her a tendency to take her temper out on all around her. This, oddly, makes people admire her more."
[....]
"Though she owes much to the rise of feminism, Snappy Sue fundamentally doesn't like women. She tends to be surrounded by men and have few female allies - female heroism is in short supply here, and Snappy gets all of it. ..."
Full blog entry:
http://www.kitwhitfield.com/2006/09/mary-sue-gets-mean.html
It's really fascinating.
(The preceding entry is also pretty fun: Mary Sue in the time of George Eliot)
Still, I read something today that was rather like a lightning strike, and I wanted to share. (I've Googled to see if it's shown up in this community before, and I can't find it.) It's an old blog entry by Kit Whitfield (an author I first heard of in this com) on a permutation of the Mary Sue -- the "Snappy Sue."
The fit is so apt it's kinda scary, I think.
Writes Whitfield (naming no names):
"A variant of Mary Sue becoming increasingly common in female-written and -marketed fantasy fiction. Snappy Sue is an empowered chick, generally urban and frequently in her twenties or older, who's respected/admired/worshipped for being a Strong Woman. Unfortunately, the author continually asserts her strength by giving her a tendency to take her temper out on all around her. This, oddly, makes people admire her more."
[....]
"Though she owes much to the rise of feminism, Snappy Sue fundamentally doesn't like women. She tends to be surrounded by men and have few female allies - female heroism is in short supply here, and Snappy gets all of it. ..."
Full blog entry:
http://www.kitwhitfield.com/2006/09/mary-sue-gets-mean.html
It's really fascinating.
(The preceding entry is also pretty fun: Mary Sue in the time of George Eliot)
no subject
Attractive men find her a turn-on, though they tend to be 'strong' men themselves; perish the thought Snappy Sue's aggressive behaviour might lead her perfect mate to be a naturally submissive man
This part isn't true. AB breaks yet another record: there are no strong male figured around her.
In general, Snappy Sue can be seen as emotionally dominant but sexually submissive
Also, no. AB is the best in everything and she is so dominant that if she didn't have boobs I'd say she was a barbarian man from the Middle Ages.
(no subject)
Snappy Sue and strong men
no subject
It'd good to see it again, though.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
Wow.
no subject
LKH's written has become nothing more than a young girl's fanfiction.
Sad thing is I have read better Fanfiction than what is being dished by LKH.
This just reminds me of Karen Scott's blog about Forty + Things I’ve Learned In Romanceland This Week…
http://karenknowsbest.blogspot.com/2007/05/forty-things-ive-learned-in-romanceland.html
My favorite part: Just because you got published, doesn’t mean that you deserved it. Your editor may have been high at the time.
Which in LKH's case it explains a lot.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Sadly, Anita hasn't been one of them for a long time. Since finding out as much as I have about LKH and observing the drastic decline of the series firsthand, I've even gotten rid of the books that I actually liked once upon a time. I can't bring myself to go back to them now, knowing what I know...
(no subject)
no subject