http://hellozombies.livejournal.com/ (
hellozombies.livejournal.com) wrote in
lkh_lashouts2007-12-28 02:24 am
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
A thought or two.
While discussing the idea of sex in novels with a friend of mine, I (of course) brought up LKH and her...um...lack of skills in that particular area. My friend said that it's extremely difficult to write sex--descriptive or not--and that she feels "awkward" while reading sex scenes. I (again) chimed in about Anita Blake--about how not only did I feel awkward, I also felt pretty damn squicked out.
We've all lamented over the boring, repetitive, gross sex. My question is, have you ever--in any novel that's ever been written--seen a decent, titillating, enthralling sex scene?
The more and more I think about it, the more I realize that I haven't seen one that's left me breathless and panting. I know that I'm much more of a slash girl than anything, but isn't that what they're supposed to do?
(It's much more fun laughing about bad sex scenes than it is hunting for good ones, I'll tell you that.)
Thoughts, dear lashers?
We've all lamented over the boring, repetitive, gross sex. My question is, have you ever--in any novel that's ever been written--seen a decent, titillating, enthralling sex scene?
The more and more I think about it, the more I realize that I haven't seen one that's left me breathless and panting. I know that I'm much more of a slash girl than anything, but isn't that what they're supposed to do?
(It's much more fun laughing about bad sex scenes than it is hunting for good ones, I'll tell you that.)
Thoughts, dear lashers?
no subject
Plus the "forbidden" nature that m/m still holds, whether it's stated, or an actual plot point, or just a subtext, gives the whole thing an emotional intensity that het can't match any more -- we can read about "forbidden" het love, but it doesn't really happen in Western societies. By and large (although not universally of course) we can do as we please and so we can't grasp the pathos in the same way. The biggest rule of a romance is that something has to stand in the way of the protagonists getting together, and by far in the ones I've edited (quite lousy ones, to be honest) that "reason" is just... STUPID. It's never more profound than "I'm not ready!" or "I'm a playa, I want freedom!" versus "I want babies before I'm old!"
Plus, really the only thing that gives a written sex scene any real power is what's going on in people's heads. The physical stuff is played-out by definition. Not there's anything wrong with that! But it doesn't necessarily make for good entertainment.
And now I think I have gone full circle and ceased to make sense. Bedtime.
no subject
Ahem. Anyway, I definitely think that the 'forbidden love' thing is part of the equation, a sort of sense of 'other'.
After reading a lot of m/m and even after seeing all the cliches and the badly-written manpr0n, it still retains that sense of 'other' even though it's not new anymore... perhaps because it's not really in mainstream media and is something that only really abounds in fic.
no subject
(However, I will admit I know a young lady who wrote some twincest that knocked my socks off despite my will and better judgement -- yeah, that telepathy angle tends to help a LOT -- so I'll just keep believing that anything that can be done can be done well or abysmally, whether or not it's my "thing.")
(Also, there is Middlesex. *applause*)
no subject
(Even people who don't like incest like twincest. There's something... catchy about the idea - especially if they're identical twins.)
(Yes, YES! Messing with gender is fun and more fun.)
no subject