http://easol.livejournal.com/ (
easol.livejournal.com) wrote in
lkh_lashouts2008-01-12 09:38 pm
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
Well thank God!
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51Lf7DmvWZL._SS500_.jpg
Finally, a cover that doesn't look like porn. Too bad about the contents -- I think they cannot be salvaged.
But I can't help but wonder if the publishers are tightening the reins a little, wanting it to look more crimey and less like naked women's tinted body parts. Given LKH's deserved reputation, I wonder if they are trying to rope in a different audience than teenagers and embittered divorcees, or just maintain their dignity.
(Although I gotta say, I would HATE that cover on any normal book -- so grimy)
Finally, a cover that doesn't look like porn. Too bad about the contents -- I think they cannot be salvaged.
But I can't help but wonder if the publishers are tightening the reins a little, wanting it to look more crimey and less like naked women's tinted body parts. Given LKH's deserved reputation, I wonder if they are trying to rope in a different audience than teenagers and embittered divorcees, or just maintain their dignity.
(Although I gotta say, I would HATE that cover on any normal book -- so grimy)
no subject
Someone on amazon theorized that this was just so they could pull out the REAL cover art (probably with some naked woman licking blood or something similarly wretched) later on. Can they do that?
no subject
So who knows? Maybe we will get a semi-naked person once again when all is said and done...