What the bloody f*ck?!? I just MIGHT believe that in the very begining she did some actual research but these days it's way too much nature calendars, books with pretty pictures (w/o reading the accompanying text) & sitting around shooting the breeze w/ her friends talking about what they used to do before they were sucked into her orbit.
And we know that she gets the vast majority of her sex 'advice' from dodgy internet porn written by 13yo girls who haven't had their first boyfriend much less their first kiss. And as for the BDSM part of her writing, she occasionally gets a few things correct but I think that most of the people she talked to (or should that be 'talked' to?) wouldn't know Safe, Sane & Consensual if it bit them on the ass. What's so appalling is we are supposed to believe that Anita is the poster-child for SS&C. Even if she had the least inkling of what 'consent' means (it doesn't mean what she thinks it does) she is only rarely 'safe' & as for 'sane' well that packed its bags & fled the disaster ages ago.
Lord but I'm bitchy today! I think this post (which is simply a preemptive strike in her usual passive/aggressive style against her new e-book being a flop) & the money-grubbing in the last one just hit me soooo wrong today. More & more these days I want to put her on a 72hr physc hold, test her to hell & gone to find out exactly how her brain chemistry is screwed and if it's treatable put her in a secure facility for 6 months to a year where she can get the meds & therapy she needs. Hey I said I was feeling bitchy. Bitchy enough that I'm not sure I should leave a separate comment of my own so I'll pack away my soapbox & high horse and leave y'all in peace for now.
no subject
And we know that she gets the vast majority of her sex 'advice' from dodgy internet porn written by 13yo girls who haven't had their first boyfriend much less their first kiss. And as for the BDSM part of her writing, she occasionally gets a few things correct but I think that most of the people she talked to (or should that be 'talked' to?) wouldn't know Safe, Sane & Consensual if it bit them on the ass. What's so appalling is we are supposed to believe that Anita is the poster-child for SS&C. Even if she had the least inkling of what 'consent' means (it doesn't mean what she thinks it does) she is only rarely 'safe' & as for 'sane' well that packed its bags & fled the disaster ages ago.
Lord but I'm bitchy today! I think this post (which is simply a preemptive strike in her usual passive/aggressive style against her new e-book being a flop) & the money-grubbing in the last one just hit me soooo wrong today. More & more these days I want to put her on a 72hr physc hold, test her to hell & gone to find out exactly how her brain chemistry is screwed and if it's treatable put her in a secure facility for 6 months to a year where she can get the meds & therapy she needs. Hey I said I was feeling bitchy. Bitchy enough that I'm not sure I should leave a separate comment of my own so I'll pack away my soapbox & high horse and leave y'all in peace for now.