http://saucyirishlass.livejournal.com/ (
saucyirishlass.livejournal.com) wrote in
lkh_lashouts2007-05-09 01:27 pm
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
Curious about this for awhile...
It's been said in many places by different people that LKH's portrayal of the BDSM lifestyle is off. I know a bit more than just the basics - ah, the joys of reading - and can sort of inherently pick up that something isn't right with her depiction, but I can't really articulate it. I was just curious to hear from those who participate in the lifestyle, what they personally find offensive, frustrating, or just headdesk-worthy about LKH's portrayal. Perhaps they can help make it clearer to me why it feels amiss.
no subject
I must know. I really must. What the hell does this mean? Was this a feature in the books, or just her whole blog drama thing?
no subject
gayFrench and therefore made of sex?) and what they're comfortable with doing isn't the same as what she's comfortable with doing, blah, blah, bitchcakes.It may have been briefly in Narcissus, but I'm blotting that out of my memory.
I know it made a brief comeback in ID, much to my disappointment.
I probably wouldn't be so irksome about it if she hadn't labelled it as "American" vs "European" sex, because of the generalisation of it all. Sex is subjective, I wouldn't have minded if she'd written Anita saying "this is my definition of sex,"
no subject
no subject
And how about that little episode where there was a wide movement for abstaining from sex until marriage in young adults - mostly as a way to safeguard against STD - and then the average number of cases of STD didn't move an inch... because the "young adults" didn't see oral sex and anal sex as breaking chastity.
no subject
no subject