![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Promise in Merry Gentry?
Hi guys!
The recent posts I've seen about the new Merry book Swallowing Darkness has got me thinking on an old disappointment. I remember when i first read the first Merry book. I admit somewhat embaressingly now that I liked the first book, it had promise and I liked it alot better then the Anita series which I'd been reading through at the time. I remember thinking that more then the ANita series, the Merry one had alot of promise and looked to be a really good series.
Back when I first read it there weren't any other books around about Faeries, bar a few young adult/teen aimed ones. Not sure if any of you can remember any Faerie based books out at the same time but please advise me if you know of any. SO to me Laurell was the first author i got to to do Faeries in the way she's done them - the 2 courts and all. I keep thinking ot myself that under the hands of a different author that whole series could be been really well done. The idea of the 2 seperate courts of Unseelie and Seelie wasn't new but 2 mad monarchs at the helm and the problem of a dying race due ot infertility was interesting. But alas like the Anita series it bombed and died a horrible death as all the sex and bad writing got in the way. Does anyone else think under a different author or if Laurell had done it right it could ahve gone on to be quite good? And does anyone know of any really good Faerie books? The ones i find these days are all the awful paranormal type ones and i find myself insulted to see powerful Faeries treated as sex toys.
Holly Black
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Read all of them--and every book and story in between. You'll be glad that you did.
no subject
I do love Toot and his little brigade of not-very-bright pizza-loving faeries, tho.
no subject
Tie someone up, torture them within an inch of their life and then kill them = done and over done.
Tie someone up, torture them within an inch of their lives, hang them up, pull them down, heal them until they look forward to the torture then kill them because you broke them = genius.
no subject
no subject
I wanna see Titania on screen dang it! She's the only Queen we haven't seen on camara speaking!
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I think at times authors try to hard to make sure they are understood. With Clarke the vague explanations of faeries actually serve to underscore their different nature.
no subject
This is a problem in books like Dennis McKiernan's, where he tries to make the elves noble and ethereal, but then goes into intricate detail about their kitchen hierarchy and mundane stuff like that.
And the selfish, casual attitude of Clarke's fairies sets them apart, to my mind -- they're not just humans with odd characteristics, but something really different.
no subject
I feel it's like showing a magic trick and then walking through and explaining how it works. It sucks the "magic" out.
no subject
Exactly! That's one thing that kinda bugs me about a lot of fantasy out there. There is something to be said for leaving things unsaid.
no subject
Thank you~! I loved Clarke's fae. But I see this that you're referring to all the time with fey, they're just humans who look funny for the most part and that irritates me. I saw it all the TIME in the Labyrinth fandom and now I see it in popular fiction. These aren't the creatures of mythology, the ones who peasant folk had to tread lightly around to make sure their lives weren't ruined by offending them. These are Renn Faire wannabes who wear shiny clothes and are eerie reminiscent of Lord of the Rings.
no subject