ext_16847 ([identity profile] delphinapterus.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] lkh_lashouts 2006-04-29 03:33 am (UTC)

Deleted an earlier comment because I thought 'him' was Edward and not Micah. That was giving me fits.

We've got him tied up in St. Louis with testimony in a child custody case for a lycanthrope that's in danger of loosing their kids.

A lycanthrope, as in one person is in danger of loosing their kids. Their is generally accepted as denoting more than one person! So either there is one lycanthrope with custody issues or there are two or more lycanthropes with custody issues. I have no idea and I'm starting to feel like Pooh tracking Woozles.


By referring to the lycanthrope as "that's" instead of "who is", it shows LKH/Anita views weres as second-class/animals even with all her very loudly states views on equality and removing discrimination against the "terminally-furry".

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
No Subject Icon Selected
More info about formatting