http://agrimlullaby.livejournal.com/ ([identity profile] agrimlullaby.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] lkh_lashouts2010-07-16 02:05 pm

Just recently finished Flirt...or wait, was it really a book?


Okay…so, I miraculously just came out the other side after spending a few tortured days dragging my feet through Flirt. Maybe it’s just me, but I get increasingly more discouraged with every book I read in this series these days. They’re just so…well, if you’ve read them, you know. Beyond words would be a good way to put it, but when in reference to anything put out lately by LKH, it’s really just my way of saying I’ve never read something so irritating that I can barely even articulate it properly.

 

At any rate, most people are probably more eager to discuss Bullet (those who have made it that far, anyway), but I’m not going to bother getting that monstrosity to tackle until the traffic over it at the library clears up, so I’m game for discussing Flirt.

 

 

But some things that I found HORRIBLY annoying in Flirt:

--The very annoying, constant referencing to people just about being able to read someone’s actions by the slightest of motions.

Okay, STOP. Please. When it kept happening, I just wanted them all to shut up and someone to die. I don’t think you can pinpoint someone’s thoughts with perfect accuracy when they so much as have an eyelid twitch. It was almost as annoying as the constant power plays that were really just unnecessary muscle flexing. It really and truly gets old VERY fast considering that most of the wording for each “powerbath” seems to just be a recycled and rehashed one from some other part of the same book or a previous one.

--The reoccurring descriptions of just about every darn little thing. The most annoying that I can recall off the top of my head is saying that someone’s pulse is like a piece of candy. How long have we heard that one? Honestly. I understand that it’s part of her style, and I understand her style as being witty and (supposedly) creative. There’s hardly any creativity in reusing the same description for quite a few more than just several occasions.

--All the pathetic group hugging (which I find hard to imagine someone so set at being hard as nails and THE man accepting without thinking) and sudden doting on Blake because she’s so darn beautiful. I don’t mean to say this in a mean way, but to most people I know, scars aren’t necessarily beautiful. Isn’t Blake covered in them? And her descriptions of them are never pretty, so I feel like I’m missing something when it comes to those and how EVERYONE seems to fall under the impression that she’s just gorgeous and flawlessly perfect for EVERY man she meets.

--All the awing over her weapons and skills. Can’t we just have bad guys who don’t care? All the commentary just adds to the inflating balloon known as Blake’s massive head full of hot air. Yeah, we get it that she’s just SO badass. Can we move on now? Please?

--Mistake in Nicky’s eye color. Really now? It says his eyes are blue earlier in the book, and then near the end says they’re brown.

--It was said earlier that lust never lies, but hope does. Later on says that the ardeur, essentially lust itself, can make lies seem like truth. Inconsistency is rampant and slowly driving me crazy, here. Stupid hypocrites.

--Honestly, I’m tired of her trying to justify herself like as if she firmly believes God forgives every murder she’s ever committed—even those done in the name of saving others. I understand possibly those for others, but she also kills purely because she feels it’s “necessary.” Whatever happened to the Golden Rule? Don’t do to others what you wouldn’t have done to yourself? Do I just sleep through church every week or what? I do believe that God is a forgiving being—I truly do. But I despise how LKH abuses that to say that Blake is still “good.” Uh-huh. I’m finding it harder to by that with every new “book.” The only good she does is in the eyes of her half-blind boytoys so infatuated with Blake I doubt they know up from down.

 

I also just love *sarcasm* how she seems perfectly okay with stealing Nicky’s free will to help herself, but when Silas is supposed to be drugging a hooker with drugs and pretty much taking that woman’s free will, suddenly they don’t have to right to do that. Uh-huh *sarcasm* Right. Got it. Makes perfect sense. And then later, she has the audacity to say she feels guilty about it, but when with her men it doesn’t seem to matter. I read that and was sputtering with anger because I think anyone in their right mind would think themselves as bad as…say…Belle Morte for doing that. But no. Because she did it so she could come back to her other brainwashed, one-dimensional sweeties, it’s okay. The heck it is because it’s not. I used to think she had a conscience…but apparently having lovers out the wazoo means that have one isn’t necessary anymore—along with having standards and morals.

 

*sigh* Okay, I’m going to can it there before I blow a gasket on this thing. It’s not worth it. All this already makes me feel ashamed to share the same first name as the “heroine” of this series and actually live in St. Louis.

[identity profile] dwg.livejournal.com 2010-07-16 07:27 pm (UTC)(link)
There's also Nicky going from having one eye to two, and I kept flicking back and forth to see if I was dreaming, but no...I wasn't. Consistency is not strong with this one.

I was honestly sputtering with outrage when Micah showed up to be "there, there, I'm sorry! It must be so horrible that you had to do that!" while Nicky's just...standing right there, and Anita totally forgets that oh hey he's now bound to her because she took away his free will. But no! SHE DID IT TO PROTECT THE PEOPLE SHE LOVES! Even though they fought the assassins and came to rescue her on their own! The point is, she's totally justified, okay? Or so I'm told over on the forums. This is when my faith in humanity takes a dive and I want to go live in a cave with a dozen cats.

In my initial dissection of the book, I wound up with 100pt bold capslocked NO LAURELL, THIS IS NOT OKAY. EVER. >:( >:( >:( all over the place.

[identity profile] dwg.livejournal.com 2010-07-16 07:57 pm (UTC)(link)
No, the eye thing came after she noted he only had one eye, which is why I went to double-check in the first place.

Thing is, if this was intentional to show Anita's finally embrace her role as a villain, this is a brilliant move. She's fully transitioned from heroic figure to the very thing her younger self would have killed on principle -- she preys on the weak, enslaves them to her will, and maintains all her actions are just. But it's not, and we're still supposed to back her as the heroine, and I just can't do that in this book.

Ugh, honestly? I would have started the book at the part where she wakes up in the cemetery. I copied the whole thing over into a Word doc, hacked out the first part and other bits that aren't necessary (such as what happend to Nicky, because Anita could still have used Silas' death to raise the zombies), and I wound up taking out about 80% of the book. I maintain that this could have been a 20k word tense, thrilling story, instead of a 50k rambling monstrosity.

[identity profile] dwg.livejournal.com 2010-07-16 10:13 pm (UTC)(link)
I only have the immediate dissections of the piece posted, and I'm cleaning them up to post to Lashouts (I'm up to part 3, where Anita meets her second client and this verse is same as the first and need to post that ASAP, and right now I'm going through the book of essays on AB:VH too) so there's less capslock rage and tangents on Questions I Have About The Animation Industry.

Mostly the copy pasta of Flirt was just to roughly hack it to pieces to see if there was anything worth saving. It's kind of interesting to see that the book itself is just under 50k words (which is about the length of a reasonable Big Bang fic), and such a large percentage have been axed without detriment to the overall story. At least, that's what would have happened were I here editor.

Man, you may want to give Bullet a miss for Richard. He's apparently been in therapy, or replaced with a pod person. I am choosing to believe that he's off sipping cocktails with the real Edward and Anita hasn't realised that he's left. So there's some guy all "why are you calling me Richard? What is going on here? Stop taking off your clothes...stop taking off my clothes!"

[identity profile] dwg.livejournal.com 2010-07-17 12:38 am (UTC)(link)
Yep, I have Ardeur. I've got three more essays to go, and thus far it's...been cringe-worthy to say the best. I mean, a few of the essays are really good, others are a complete mess or have any relation to AB:VH tacked in there as an afterthought. The prologues by LKH are really, really special.

Yeah, it's totally one rule for Anita, one rule for everyone else. But I really loved Natalie just for how cheerful she was at the prospect of chopping up her husband. I want more of this in zombie stories! Think of how cathartic it would be!

I'm convinced that everything that Edward has done in the books has been to basically mess with Anita's head to lull her into a false sense of security. And the lulz.

[identity profile] magdalen77.livejournal.com 2010-07-17 05:45 am (UTC)(link)
After LKH moved to Berkley (Penguin) she got a no-edit contract, so they're only allowed to do some proofreading not actually edit her mess. That combined with the fact that she gets in her books very late (sometimes less than 7 weeks before publication date) so the proofreaders have their work cut out for them. I wouldn't get too annoyed at her editors since they aren't allowed to do their jobs. I'd save my ire for the publishers who are so money-hungry they give La Laurell a no-edit contract and publish her dreck.

[identity profile] magdalen77.livejournal.com 2010-07-17 05:34 pm (UTC)(link)
I think that now they're basically giving her enough rope to hang herself. As long as she's still selling well they'll let her get away with all sorts of crap. This next AB book is the last book on her current contract. I do expect the new contract to have tougher deadlines and they may either cut into her percentage due to decreasing sales or force her to accept editing. The last couple of books she's gone down from a high of around 250K copies sold per book to more like 150K sold. 150K is still a lot of books so I doubt they'll let her go, but they might do something about the fact that she can't meet a reasonable deadline.

[identity profile] magdalen77.livejournal.com 2010-07-17 09:31 pm (UTC)(link)
The only thing we can hope for is that they try to force her to allow editing and she accepts and doesn't just jump to another, smaller publisher. I think that might be what's happening with her MG series now. Her contract for that was up with Divine Misdemeanors and she burnt her bridges with Ballantine more than she has with Penguin. The MG series hasn't been as successful as AB. I think her agent is trying to sell the series to another publisher.

[identity profile] desert-vixen.livejournal.com 2010-07-18 02:30 am (UTC)(link)

So... the book after Bullet is the last one on the contract? That should be fun to watch.

[identity profile] magdalen77.livejournal.com 2010-07-18 03:17 am (UTC)(link)
Yep, this next AB book is the last in the contract. I believe its name is Cabaret. Let everyone cringe at what ideas LKH could have gotten to chose that name for her next book.

[identity profile] magdalen77.livejournal.com 2010-07-16 11:39 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm surprised that people are still waiting for Bullet in your library system. I was able to get a copy within a week or so and no one is waiting for it now. As opposed to Charlaine Harris' latest which has 40 holds and The Help which still has 360 holds after 60 weeks in the NY Times list.

But you're correct about Flirt, there's no plot to the book. Just like the last 8 or so AB books.

[identity profile] magdalen77.livejournal.com 2010-07-17 05:56 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah the scraps are more frustrating than if she didn't have any ideas at all. But in each book she doesn't manage to get maybe one or two good ideas for plot points and then she drowns it in endless descriptions about people we've already met, their hair and eye color, what they're wearing and how ginormous their schlongs are. Plus of course endless cut and pasted sex scenes with just the boitoi du jour changing. In Bullet we were treated to two identical sex scenes between Anita/JC and Anita/Richard. In both she made much of the height difference between Anita (the shortest woman on life) and JC/Richard making regular missionary position impossible.*

*Total nonsense BTW. I attribute that to the fact that LKH herself has never been with a man who is more than few inches taller than herself and she assumes that a 8" or 9" difference would be a problem. Being LKH she doesn't bother to find out.

[identity profile] magdalen77.livejournal.com 2010-07-17 05:38 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm around 4'10" and I've never been with a man who was less than 10 inches taller. My husband is 6'1". I've never noticed a problem with doing missionary position. Possibly if I was a few inches shorter and my partner was the height of, say, Shaquille O'Neal there might be a problem.

I find her constant rants about 5'3" being sooooo tiny tedious since I'm 5 inches shorter than her teeny, tiny, itsy, bitsy avatar.

[identity profile] clover-elf-kin.livejournal.com 2010-07-17 06:58 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't understand how a height difference COULD be a problem in missionary position. You're lying down! Repositioning is so easy I can't imagine even needing to think about it much!

69ing, of course, is another story. But that's a little different (for example, OMG kinky except not).

[identity profile] lady-fellshot.livejournal.com 2010-07-17 11:33 pm (UTC)(link)
Perhaps she should move to places where being 5'3" is normal height (or even above average height. I've been told that at 5'2" I'm median height in a lot of Asian countries.

[identity profile] desert-vixen.livejournal.com 2010-07-18 02:39 am (UTC)(link)

The only issue with height difference like that (my ex and I had a foot difference between us, me 5'3'' and him 6'3'') is that depending on whether the people have more height in their torso vs. their legs, you may not be able to be perfectly face to face. But that's an easy enough fix... or maybe you just skip missionary. :)

[identity profile] magdalen77.livejournal.com 2010-07-18 03:27 am (UTC)(link)
That's what she keeps whining about. The height difference between Anita and Richard or JC is too great for regular missionary position. I don't see it unless either JC or Richard have abnormally elongated torsos. The height difference between my man and me is about 14" and we have no problems. So, I don't believe that her 10" difference would matter. I know LKH has her favorite height for a man. She's stated she prefers men who are no more than 5'8" or so. She's probably never been with someone that much taller than she is and she's never bothered to find out.

I realize it's a small thing to be annoyed about, but in Bullet she did the same whine in two successive chapters. First she's boinking Richard and he's too tall for regular missionary position, then she's boinking JC with the same comments. I guess if she was boinking Wicked and Truth there would be the same story.

[identity profile] desert-vixen.livejournal.com 2010-07-18 06:03 am (UTC)(link)

I guess I've always assumed Gary was tall, but maybe not?

For someone who prides herself of her sex scenes, she doesn't seem to have much imagination on how to go about it when it doesn't involve adding extra people.

[identity profile] magdalen77.livejournal.com 2010-07-18 07:59 pm (UTC)(link)
She may have written about this before, though I can't remember another instance. This was just so obvious and annoying because it was in back to back chapters.

And yes, Skin Trade was all about Anita getting boinked by whomever whilst another member of the penis parade sat by observing and talking about how tight n' wet she is. Sort of like a pimp having someone "try out" the new girl.

[identity profile] magdalen77.livejournal.com 2010-07-20 12:49 am (UTC)(link)
I personally think that by now Anita is about as "tight" as the Lincoln Tunnel. Especially since mamy of the members of the penis parade are renowned for their ginormous schlongs.

[identity profile] magdalen77.livejournal.com 2010-07-18 07:55 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't know whether Gary is tall or not. But the only way her constant whining that a woman who's 5'3" and a man who's slightly over 6' tall can't possibly do regular missionary position makes sense is if she's never experienced it and is just assuming. If she had ever been in the situation she would know it's possible/no problem.

Like I've said I don't know why this out of all the weird things LKH has written bothers me. I guess it's just that it's more evidence that she can't be bothered to find out if something she's written as fact is actually fact.

[identity profile] jazzymegster.livejournal.com 2010-07-17 06:57 pm (UTC)(link)
Man, I must be lucky that I top out at 5'4" then.

You and me both, then ;) Just doing a reread to see why I liked the books in the first place (I now have no idea!), and that whole "OMG I'M SO SHORT!" thing really gets on my nerves. I mean yeah, I can't reach the top shelves in a supermarket either but ya know what? I don't spend the real life equivalent of half a book whining about it.

[identity profile] clover-elf-kin.livejournal.com 2010-07-17 07:02 pm (UTC)(link)
Compared to most men, she's short. And it seems that's all that matters. -_-

(Reposted for, uh, emoticon fail...)

[identity profile] jazzymegster.livejournal.com 2010-07-17 09:30 pm (UTC)(link)
*sighs* Yeah. Ain't that the truth?

[identity profile] jazzymegster.livejournal.com 2010-07-17 09:28 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't get what's there to whine about for any longer than five seconds if even that.

Exactly! Sometimes I shake my fist at God (or whoever) for not making me taller, but there's nothing can be done about it.

[identity profile] magdalen77.livejournal.com 2010-07-17 09:35 pm (UTC)(link)
I honestly don't think of 5'3" or 5'4" as short. Like I said I'm 4'10" and even I don't angst about my shortness. Hey, there are shorter people (not many but some) and I've had a lifetime of working around it. In the supermarket if I can't knock it down or climb up to get it I find a nice taller lady or man to get it for me, no big deal.

[identity profile] jazzymegster.livejournal.com 2010-07-17 10:06 pm (UTC)(link)
That's a fair point (sorry; now I feel like I'm whining when I know you're shorter then me because I read your comment above, and also my mum is only just five feet tall herself).

But yeah, exactly, if you can't reach it, ask someone else to do it! (Or stand on the shelves ;) )

[identity profile] lady-fellshot.livejournal.com 2010-07-17 11:35 pm (UTC)(link)
Standing on the shelves is frequently more fun and we can be pretty assured that we won't break them when we do. :D

[identity profile] magdalen77.livejournal.com 2010-07-18 03:30 am (UTC)(link)
I will stand on the shelves, but sometimes they don't look so sturdy or well attached and I don't want to end up knocking things over.

[identity profile] librarista.livejournal.com 2010-07-17 12:36 am (UTC)(link)
I've had a few people come in who have just started the series or are catching up. And before I can warn them about what it turns into, they tell me they're already past OB and loving it and it's really pointless. I want to tell them there's well written (or better written) paranormal smut out there, but that's outside of my comfort zone. And my library doesn't carry any of the really smutty stuff. As steamy as other series get, it's never three on one with possible rape and taking advantage of damaged people.

[identity profile] loliconpops.livejournal.com 2010-07-16 11:43 pm (UTC)(link)
Not worth buying hardback? I generally don't unless I really like the book in the first place (I waited a year to buy Blood Noir paperback... and I wish I didn't...) but I'll assume I should wait.