[identity profile] moonsinger.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] lkh_lashouts
First of all, I've commented quite a bit on this community, but I've never posted.  I'm thinking about picking up the first Stephanie Meyer Twilight book, but I wanted to see what you guys thought of the series.  I've heard it had a lot of the flaws of the Anita Blake series.  I'm probably going to get it before the movie, but I'd at least like to know that it doesn't totally suck or it does totally suck before going in there.  Please don't give away plot stuff though since I haven't read any of the books.

Date: 2008-10-04 12:07 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] curseangel.livejournal.com
I haven't read the series, but I read exactly one paragraph of the first of the Twilight series... burst out laughing, and promptly put away any thoughts I had of ever reading them.

Seriously. Vampires that sparkle in the sunlight. Sparkle. It was awful.

Date: 2008-10-04 12:10 am (UTC)
ext_8578: (Default)
From: [identity profile] jassanja.livejournal.com
Well, my problem with Twillight is the Teenager thing.
This bunch of Vamps is happy to spend 100 years as teenagers (and unlike Anne Rice's Claudia they don't just act that way, but really are as naive as 16 year olds)
This goes even so far that the heroine fears that she could get older then her vamp crush.....

That (and the bad research about raising another person across two continents) is really the part that annoyed me so much, that I did not read any further

Date: 2008-10-04 12:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] evewithanapple.livejournal.com
Anti-feminist tripe that's teaching tween girls that emotional abuse and stalking are signs of true love. It's disgusting.

Date: 2008-10-04 12:35 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] windiain.livejournal.com
First book I loved, the next two had their moments, the final took a leap off a cliff and into the Twilight Zone, waving at LKH's worlds as it hurtled past.

Date: 2008-10-04 12:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] quizzicalsphinx.livejournal.com
Stephanie Meyer = Anita Blake without the sex. And not in a good way.

Date: 2008-10-04 01:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kessie.livejournal.com
This was pretty much reaction too. XD;

Date: 2008-10-04 01:06 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] beth-ann.livejournal.com
Yeah, when I heard about the sparkling I went no. No, no, no. I want my vampires like I want my chocolate, dark, smooth and melting in the sunlight.

Date: 2008-10-04 01:16 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tenaya-owlcat.livejournal.com
The first book had some interesting concepts, and it's a mildly entertaining read. Beyond that, it goes downhill and the main character becomes completely incapable of taking care of herself... or thinking for herself, for that matter.

Date: 2008-10-04 01:28 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] othellia.livejournal.com
Well, we've had 9000 similar posts, but to me Meyer never gets old. Anyways... LKH and Meyer? They both write self-insert sues from the first perspective. However, LKH infuses her own personality to best life through her books whereas Meyer wipes almost all sense of personality so that all of her teenage fans can life through the book and want an Edward of their own! :D

Shinga says it best (http://headtripcomics.comicgenesis.com/d/20080915.html).

Date: 2008-10-04 01:37 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dkphoenix.livejournal.com
I'd say they're more like Christine Feehan's Dark Carpathian series without the sex than Anita Blake. Twilight is very, very much about monogamy and finding your One True Love. (To the point that many of the characters don't have much choice in the matter.)

The writing style isn't terrible, but most of the characters are pretty flat, and not particularly likable. (Bella, the protagonist, is especially vapid and one-dimensional. Edward, her love interest, is controlling and domineering to the point of being abusive. (And most of the other characters are just peachy-keen fine with that, including Bella.) A lot of the characters are pathologically obsessive, but this isn't treated as an interesting character flaw, it's more like a substitute FOR personality. There's some rather squicky almost-pedophilia in New Moon and (especially) Breaking Dawn. And then there's the cringe-inducing "sparkle in the sun" passage.

I wouldn't pay retail for them. Check them out from the library, see if you can tolerate the issues enough to enjoy the entertaining bits.

Date: 2008-10-04 01:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kellyfaboo.livejournal.com
OMG, that comic is so spot ON!

Date: 2008-10-04 01:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gehayi.livejournal.com
Shinga's right. That's not even a parody; it's just deadly accurate observation.

Date: 2008-10-04 02:33 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] burning-nova.livejournal.com
I didn't like what I read of Twilight. I found Bella annoying to the point where I wanted to throw the book across the room. Compared to Anita (the earlier version) I think Bella is lame and so are her vamps. Really, they're all like giant Mary Sues. At least in the earlier AB books it wasn't that bloody obvious and hello, WTF is it with sparkling? My vamps should either not burst into fire in the sunlight or do. If they sparkle I'm shooting myself.

Date: 2008-10-04 02:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zgirl714.livejournal.com
The entire book series could be condensed into one book. I thought the fourth book was the funniest because it was pretty wacky, but all of them drag on about nothing for pages. A lot like LKH without the sex.

Date: 2008-10-04 02:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] othellia.livejournal.com
And OMG... I just reread my comment and realized that I used "life" instead of "live"... TWICE. D:

Date: 2008-10-04 02:41 am (UTC)

Date: 2008-10-04 02:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gothgoddessrhia.livejournal.com
Agreed. That excuse about her falling down the stairs had me yelling "WTF?" The single most common excuse abused women give.

*shakes head*

Date: 2008-10-04 03:08 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fizzylizard.livejournal.com
Save yourself some time and brain cells. Read [livejournal.com profile] cleolinda's recaps instead. She's gone through the whole shebang.

This is probably the easiest place to find most of them:

http://cleolinda.livejournal.com/630150.html

Date: 2008-10-04 03:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] knowthyself.livejournal.com
More or less, this!

It has its flaws, yes. I don't know that I would say they are the same flaws as the LKH books, though. I found the first three enjoyable for what they were--popcorn YA Vampire Romance novels. Expect that and I imagine you'll at least be entertained for the handful of days it takes to read them.

Date: 2008-10-04 03:26 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] knowthyself.livejournal.com
might wanna tag that for spoilers, since the OP asked people not to tell any details!

Date: 2008-10-04 03:34 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] othellia.livejournal.com
Whoops. Well... I'm not a fancy paid person, so I can't edit it. Hopefully she'll read this before she clicks on the link? :D

Date: 2008-10-04 06:03 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] terratheelf.livejournal.com
I dislike the twilight books a lot due to the messages they send their readers. Granted I have only read bits and pieces and all the snark but after what I heard, I just cannot bring myself to even borrow them from the library.

I did read the leaked bit of the Edward POV book and honestly if that sort of person was expressing interest in me, I would be running the other way very very fast.

I was in a bookstore and there were two girls begging the clerks for book recs just like Twilight and all I could do was stare at them in shock. There is a lot better YA oriented vampire fiction out there. I read a good ton of it when I was in grade 8 and high school.

Date: 2008-10-04 06:22 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] moonbeamdancer.livejournal.com
I would recommend buying the first book Twilight, at a used book store. New Moon and Eclipse were meh for me and Breaking Dawn sucks royally, so stay away from that one at all costs.

Date: 2008-10-04 08:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wariena.livejournal.com
I think I'll have to agree. Reading it's kind of like falling down a well. A very deep well.

Date: 2008-10-04 12:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ana-beachcombe.livejournal.com
I swear to gods this is true: I just got back from a dinner with a bunch of HarperCollins executives and one of them told me she read Cleolinda's recaps and thought they were brilliant.

Date: 2008-10-04 12:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dwg.livejournal.com
[livejournal.com profile] badfic_quotes has an epic Twilight series sporkage linkfest (http://community.livejournal.com/badfic_quotes/570635.html) in the comments. I'm finding the snarks of the books to be both entertaining and educational. It'll be like a test drive to see if you really want to read the source material.

God I can't wait for the movie. XDDD

Date: 2008-10-04 02:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] easol.livejournal.com
And that if a man tells you to do something, you do it submissively with no thoughts of what YOU want to do. Unless it's hormonal, of course.

Date: 2008-10-04 04:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] watersheerie.livejournal.com
Twilight is terrible.

And even 'terrible' is too mild a word to explain the epic horror that awaits you.

'Twilight' at it's best is simply boring. At it's worst it's an offensive book that sends a negative message to young women. It's degrading to women in general. It's so freakin' long, yet has absolutely nothing of worth within those pages. Impossible, I know, but Meyer managed to write a long-ass book that says nothing at all.

Edward eats mountain lions, and Meyer is dumb enough to say that he only does it in areas where the population is excessive... May I ask where in the USA is there an excessive population of an endangered animal?

Date: 2008-10-04 05:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] brightlotusmoon.livejournal.com
Yep.
Edward is an emotionally and verbally abusive stalker who plays mind games with Bella, who is too stupid, vapid, brainless, and clueless to realize he's dangerous.

I love this:
http://scargut-the-gutless.deviantart.com/art/Methinks-Bella-likes-Edward-99242138

And of course, these:
http://shinga.deviantart.com/art/Head-Trip-Twilight-Sucks-85504254
http://shinga.deviantart.com/art/Head-Trip-Breaking-Dawn-98016573

Date: 2008-10-04 05:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] brightlotusmoon.livejournal.com
Holy crap, that's awesome! Yay for Cleolinda!

Date: 2008-10-04 06:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] red-rose-remix.livejournal.com
X3 It's riddled with things to make your brain hurt. If you're just looking for entertainment and don't take it seriously, it might be worth it.

[Bad username or site: @ livejournal.com] has an awesome parody of the first book, and she's just had it published through Lulu. She starts the second book parody soon!

Date: 2008-10-04 07:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] maladaptive.livejournal.com
Anita Blake is hugely superior to Twilight-- unless you read Twilight (and especially Breaking Dawn) as straight-up horror. Then it's a masterpiece of nightmare fuel, the likes of which I have never before been subjected to.

Date: 2008-10-04 11:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] belledewinter.livejournal.com
... Stick to Anita's nymphomaniac-filled world. I mean, srsly. As bad as the AB books have been at times, the first two Twilight books kept me wanting to spoon my eyes out and burn the book in frustration. And yeah, I even tried. No deal. :/

Date: 2008-10-05 01:06 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nightangel486.livejournal.com
OMG yes! I loved those books! My younger sister loves Twilight so I tried to get her to read the Vampire Diaries, since I saw so many similarities between the two as well. L.J. Smith did it much better though.

Date: 2008-10-05 06:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nightwalker.livejournal.com
The Morganville Vampires by Rachel Caine and Sunshine by Robin McKinley are both better vampire reads than anything Stephanie Meyers could offer you.

/pimpage

Date: 2008-10-09 06:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] putana.livejournal.com
I haven't read the books, but from what I've heard (especially the development of the series), I think they make AB:VH look like plot filled well written works. Seriously (and that makes me feel gross just saying it).

Probably okay to give them a go if you are interested, since they do have a decent following. And some sane fans in amongst the fangirls with crushes on Edward.

Date: 2008-10-09 06:48 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] putana.livejournal.com
Damon ;)

And I fear what he'll end up like in the new book. :X

Date: 2008-10-09 10:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] putana.livejournal.com
WORD. I find that the fascinating thing about the series - Bella sounds stupid, but I find her far more likable than Edward. I don't get the fangirls running about praising Edward and hating Bella.

...well, I *do*, because it is mostly fantasizing that they ARE Bella. Still sad though.

Date: 2008-10-18 02:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ruas1000.livejournal.com
When I first heard of SMeyer and her concept, my very first thought was Anitaverse for tweens.

Date: 2008-10-18 09:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zgirl714.livejournal.com
Its really inane. Its badly written and so many of the fans of the books think that its the second coming of shakespeare which disappoints me on so many levels.

Profile

lkh_lashouts: (Default)
LKH Lashouts

January 2023

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 4th, 2026 05:41 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios