Movie news!
Apr. 1st, 2009 05:06 amApologies to everyone on my f-list that I spammed about this - but remember when LKH said that she was in talks about an AB:VH movie? Turns out it's really happening.
The 16-books-and-counting Blake novels by Laurell Hamilton include elements familiar to fans of True Blood (vampires are part of regular society) and Buffy the Vampire Slayer (tough young female fights supernatural forces). The project will be adapted by Glen Morgan (X-Files, Final Destination), who also serves as executive producer along with Courtney Solomon (Dungeons and Dragons).I loved X-Files but hated D&D, so I'm of the opinion that the two producers cancel each other out. I'll be keeping an ear to the internets for updates as they come.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-31 06:43 pm (UTC)But WTF, IFC? Is it really INDEPENDENT if freaking LIONSGATE is producing it?
no subject
Date: 2009-03-31 06:43 pm (UTC)Maybe they'll just concentrate on the decent early books and leave the bad porn alone. We can only hope.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-31 06:46 pm (UTC)Clearly it won't be oscar quality, but I'm hopeful it will at least be watchable
no subject
Date: 2009-03-31 06:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-31 07:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-31 07:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-31 08:30 pm (UTC)All I really care about, if I can stomach seeing the movie, is who is playing Jean-Claude because can any man on earth really look that ethereally beautiful and sexy while wearing a frou frou puffy shirt?
I mean, besides Johnny Depp, Nathan Fillion, Daniel Craig, Travis Fimmel, and Takeshi Kaneshiro. ^_~
no subject
Date: 2009-03-31 08:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-31 08:39 pm (UTC)Oh, boy, I'm already feeling sorry for whoever does end up playing Anita.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-31 08:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-31 09:00 pm (UTC)Angel, Buffy and so on where not on my top list, totally not. True blood is not as good as the books, and I don't comment on Anne Rice, because that was my first Bit-Lit, and it's too long far away for that. But if they can make a good movie like the Interview, I will not say No. Provided they don't try to wash down.
Aaahh, but the potential is so high. It's a shame it's not an english that make it. They're very good, even if they don't have the technical goods (see Jekyll, Dr Who, and other that I don't know the english names).
Yep, very good. *sigh*
I'm pretty sur it's because the english makers have no qualms to be distrubing, sad, and have a bad ending. (no thinking of Harry potter, because that just Argh, Rowling was just stealing the idea from Horowitz, I'm pretty sur, and make a sweet thing with it for her kids.
I stop rambling. I have to finish my Nid d'Abeille for tomorrow.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-31 09:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-31 09:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-31 10:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-31 10:23 pm (UTC)Lionsgate? As in the leading producer of cheap sequel gorn? Somehow I'm not surprised by this.
Though... all of those recent Saw-like covers might have had a hidden meaning behind them leading up to this adaptation.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-31 10:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-31 10:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-31 10:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-31 10:59 pm (UTC)yeah...
no subject
Date: 2009-03-31 11:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-31 11:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-31 11:38 pm (UTC)Is that from the article?
no subject
Date: 2009-04-01 12:09 am (UTC)I think you nailed it right there. If the audience for the movie is young males, they will have to make some changes in the early AB books like sexing up Anita and de-sissifying the men.
After any movie/show comes out there is always a jump in the book sales and if they want the men to be buying them they have got to fix up the covers. I always thought LKH's reason for changing the covers was weird - that she wanted to stand out from the crowd but copies the imagery from another genre.
I bet that all the old covers will be replaced by the new style by the time the movie is released.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-01 12:20 am (UTC)*shudder*
no subject
Date: 2009-04-01 01:34 am (UTC)which is DUMB