The Annotated Anita Blake, Vampire Hunter
Dec. 30th, 2006 11:02 am![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
eden-guardian.livejournal.com posting in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
lkh_lashoutsMajor lurker but since no one else has posted these I thought I might as well. Chris of Chris' Invincible Super Blog has post his thoughts on Anita Blake #3 as he has also done so for prior issues: here and here!
Yesterday's synopsis is what got me however: "Anita Blake, Vampire Hunter: Guilty Pleasures #3: As always, expect more details to follow tomorrow (although not in the form of a match-up this time), but trust me on one thing: This book is gloriously horrible. Never before have I read a comic where the plot points have come in such a seemingly random order while the characters react to life-threatening situations with bored, slightly dyspeptic expressions and self-contradictory dialogue. It's like the whole thing was assembled with magnetic poetry and a blender, and it is beautiful."
Yes, beautiful.
Yesterday's synopsis is what got me however: "Anita Blake, Vampire Hunter: Guilty Pleasures #3: As always, expect more details to follow tomorrow (although not in the form of a match-up this time), but trust me on one thing: This book is gloriously horrible. Never before have I read a comic where the plot points have come in such a seemingly random order while the characters react to life-threatening situations with bored, slightly dyspeptic expressions and self-contradictory dialogue. It's like the whole thing was assembled with magnetic poetry and a blender, and it is beautiful."
Yes, beautiful.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}