where are mrs. pringle and custard?
Feb. 12th, 2007 09:25 amA blogflog! Wherein LKH discusses just what happened to Mrs. Pringle and Custard. I've been curious about this, myself.
LKH- bold
Me- fits of laughter
URL- http://blog.laurellkhamilton.org/2007/02/where-are-mrs-pringle-and-custard.html
I'll answer one quick question. Where have Mrs. Pringle and Custard gone? I have had two ideas that involve them, but had to push them back. One is discarded completely because you don't need a Pomeranian to wake you to bad guys surrounding the house when you're living with two wereleopards?
Did I miss the question here? I must have, because there is a clear question mark at the end of that declarative sentence. Further, in the time of B.P. (before pr0n) Custard tries to show dominance over Richard. I think this was Guilty Pleasures. Typically, smaller dogs do that when faced with a larger perceived threat. Naturally, he is unsuccessful, but clearly LKH has forgotten that Custard does have some sort of sense that alerts him to danger. Nice though he may sometimes be, Richard is the Ulfric, and that little dog definitely knew something was up, while Mrs. Pringle was completely unaware.
We might still try and do it, but I just can't decide how much different, or better the dog's senses are than the wereleopards. I know from my experience with one of my pugs that, not all dogs are watch dogs. In fact some of them will happily snooze through the emergency. The other plot that remains has lost some of it's amusement factor for me, because I hate to bring on Mrs. Pringle and have something horrible happen to her.
Several things about this paragraph irritate me immensely:
A) Why does it automatically have to be a battle of the senses between the dog and the wereleopards? If she wanted to involve Custard in a "plot" of some sort, couldn't both he and the wereleopards know that something is wrong?
B) Pomeranians are not the same as pugs. Just because her lazy pug snoozes through trouble doesn't mean that a pomeranian would. I love pugs, but it is certainly foolhardy to assume that you know all about dogs simply because you have a pug that likes his naps.
C) Mrs. Pringle was an adorable minor character. She seemed concerned about Anita when they were neighbors, approving of Richard on sight, and didn't bat an eyelash when someone blew a hole through Anita's door. She was a classic innocent bystander, and bad things sometimes happen to innocent bystanders. It made sense that we didn't see her anymore because they were no longer neighbors. Bringing her back for the sole purpose of having something bad happen to her is a GREAT idea. It would add a much-needed shot of reality to the series, and would help to stave off the criticism that nothing bad ever happens to these people.
Did I miss the question here? I must have, because there is a clear question mark at the end of that declarative sentence. Further, in the time of B.P. (before pr0n) Custard tries to show dominance over Richard. I think this was Guilty Pleasures. Typically, smaller dogs do that when faced with a larger perceived threat. Naturally, he is unsuccessful, but clearly LKH has forgotten that Custard does have some sort of sense that alerts him to danger. Nice though he may sometimes be, Richard is the Ulfric, and that little dog definitely knew something was up, while Mrs. Pringle was completely unaware.
We might still try and do it, but I just can't decide how much different, or better the dog's senses are than the wereleopards. I know from my experience with one of my pugs that, not all dogs are watch dogs. In fact some of them will happily snooze through the emergency. The other plot that remains has lost some of it's amusement factor for me, because I hate to bring on Mrs. Pringle and have something horrible happen to her.
Several things about this paragraph irritate me immensely:
A) Why does it automatically have to be a battle of the senses between the dog and the wereleopards? If she wanted to involve Custard in a "plot" of some sort, couldn't both he and the wereleopards know that something is wrong?
B) Pomeranians are not the same as pugs. Just because her lazy pug snoozes through trouble doesn't mean that a pomeranian would. I love pugs, but it is certainly foolhardy to assume that you know all about dogs simply because you have a pug that likes his naps.
C) Mrs. Pringle was an adorable minor character. She seemed concerned about Anita when they were neighbors, approving of Richard on sight, and didn't bat an eyelash when someone blew a hole through Anita's door. She was a classic innocent bystander, and bad things sometimes happen to innocent bystanders. It made sense that we didn't see her anymore because they were no longer neighbors. Bringing her back for the sole purpose of having something bad happen to her is a GREAT idea. It would add a much-needed shot of reality to the series, and would help to stave off the criticism that nothing bad ever happens to these people.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-13 12:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-15 03:27 am (UTC)Written and proof read by her dogs *snerk*
no subject
Date: 2007-02-12 03:44 pm (UTC)and wetrelationship with her neightbours at her former apartment complex, why on earth would she keep in contact?Secondly, I am creeped right the fuck out by the notion of involving Custard in something with wereleopards. I'm sure that Pom is secretly a ninja assassin and would be able to pwn all Siamese cats on the block and then team up with Sigmund to rid St Louis of the Anita-scourge. BUT OMGWTF?! ANITA MOVED AWAY! WHY THE HELL WOULD CUSTARD SUDDENLY BE IN HER HOUSE?!? WHYYYY???
But oh, logic does not apply in this argument, does it? Stupid, stupid me. *smacks self*
Though, given how uber-l33t both Micah and Nathaniel's
spiderwereleopard senses are and that they did not notice that A) Anita had missed her period and B) she wasn't pregnant, maybe Custard as the watchdog isn't such a bad idea.God, now I'm getting the adorable mental image of Richard adopting Custard and getting little doggy-sweaters for him as they sit down to watch G&S musicals. XD
no subject
Date: 2007-02-12 03:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-12 04:06 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:She's renting? How?
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-02-12 05:59 pm (UTC)AWwwwww, he'd totally get him doggy sweaters with little wolves knitted on to them :)
no subject
Date: 2007-02-13 02:56 pm (UTC)I'm sure Richard would never live it down. Badass werewolf, pwned by Pomeranian.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:I've been thinking about the 'pregnancy' scare
Date: 2007-02-13 06:02 am (UTC)I'd still think the guys should have noticed that she stopped smelling like blood every month--Hello? Blood? Predators?--but maybe they were too discombobulated from all the sex and violence. Ya think?
no subject
Date: 2007-02-13 02:45 pm (UTC)Re: I've been thinking about the 'pregnancy' scare
From:Re: I've been thinking about the 'pregnancy' scare
From:no subject
Date: 2007-02-12 04:23 pm (UTC)I can't help but notice that after all that aqua waffle about pugs and wereleopards, Laurell didn't actually answer the question at all.
Presumably this is because any right-minded person would assume that Mrs. Pringle and Custard are safely at home in their apartment, sleeping soundly without Anita keeping them up with her noisy
moneygunshots.no subject
Date: 2007-02-12 04:33 pm (UTC)Abd then we might get a quick montage of close neighbours going on about how they didn't really know Anita all that well and that they kinda appreciate the life they have now that she's not in their building.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-02-12 05:33 pm (UTC)Flee, Mrs. Pringle! Flee for your life! Take the Pom and ruuuuuun!
no subject
Date: 2007-02-12 07:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-12 07:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-12 09:20 pm (UTC)I was rereading Guilty Pleasures the other day, actually... It was so good. Ugh. Why do you suck now, LKH? Why?
Also, pugs are horrible little dogs that are somehow perfect for LKH. Egh.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-13 03:36 am (UTC)I honestly pity her dogs, because the pugs are horribly obese, she dresses them up in clothes and there's a picture of Jon THROWING ONE UP IN THE AIR.
That was...pretty horrifying in and of itself. I wish someone would call the humane society on them...because that's just...no. You don't treat animals like that. Ever. *much stabbity DOOM at Jon*
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-02-12 11:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-13 12:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-13 05:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-13 06:31 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-02-13 10:51 am (UTC)Just change the names, and include a slightly crazy and very nymphomaniac neighbour. LKH is too obsessed with how ZOMG unique and powerful anita is to notice a rip off of the minor characters.
and you'd treat them so much better
no subject
Date: 2007-02-13 03:06 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-02-13 09:07 pm (UTC)It's not that I think the series needs cuteness exactly, but it adds so much life to have these irrelevant little details. Imagine hearing that Micah has a pet hamster or Nathaniel had an experience as a child where he forgot his lines to the school play. It wouldn't advance the plot. It wouldn't be a big crashing Revelation. But it would make them a little more into people.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-14 07:44 pm (UTC)Except, moi slender ducky,
It would involve le dreaded continuity.
I'd completely forgotten about Mrs.Pringer and Custer. Absolutely and completely forgotten. And then reading this I started to remember they were one of the reasons I originally loved the book. Anita had a prime example of why she was an executioner right there beside her. She did what she did so little old ladies like Mrs. Pringle could live in peace.
Moreever, I loved Custer trying to dominate Richard. It was adorable. It was human and normal and slice of life. I used to find myself wondering how Custer would treat Jean Claude and Edward. I also used to think that Custer being hurt would be a more dreadful thing that some of the people Anita met. Cause he was a protector too, just 'bite sized'.
Funny how all that got washed away under a tide of vaginal juices.