comic merch!
Feb. 25th, 2007 04:16 pmWe've all been laughing/shuddering at some of the art in the comic version of Guilty Pleasures. Like the thunder thighs and the throw-proportions-to-the-wind attitude. Now we have something far more disturbing to laugh at: They're selling merchandise with the comic book art imprinted on it. I had to look, and I swear, anyone in this community could make better items for sale using one hand and a pack of sharpies. The most offensive offering, in my humble opinion, were these *extremely sexy* men's boxer shorts with Comic!Jean-Claude emblazoned on the thigh.
So many questions spring to mind: Who would wear these? Who would make these? Was it deliberate? Why are the boxers the cheap white kind that are given away at theme parties, usually bearing the legend "i danced my pants off at _______'s sweet 16"?
But anyway, i thought i'd share the lolz, because nothing says funny like Anita Blake postage pals. Not an actual stamp, mind. But a sticker of some sort with a space for the stamp. Sorry, LKH. Elvis can be a stamp. Not Anita.
EDIT: One of the things that has always bothered me is that on almost every piece of merchandise, there is a huge font that reads"Laurell K Hamilton Anita Blake Series" or some incarnation of the statement. In my humble opinion, merchandise that is successful is subtle, without much fanfare and credit, that allows fans to squee when they see it, and non-fans to wonder what the deal is. Case in point: I have a black tshirt with a huge yellow pepper on the front with a big bite taken out of it. That's it. People will stop me in the street to ask where i got it, what it's about, etc. Fans of Iron Chef, who get the reference, literally go berserk and ask where they can get one. That is successful merchandise, it doesn't need a huge font at the bottom proclaiming Iron Chef, and whoever the hell created it.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-25 09:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-25 09:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-25 09:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-25 09:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-25 09:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-25 09:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-25 09:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-25 09:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-25 09:47 pm (UTC)To me it's just another example of LKH's whoring of her "intellectual" (and BOY do I use that term loosely) property. I'm waiting for her to hire Anita and JC lookalikes to flank her at signings and convention appearances.
Oh wait, she doesn't need an Anita lookalike does she?
no subject
Date: 2007-02-25 09:49 pm (UTC)I don't need bleech..I need a transplant
no subject
Date: 2007-02-25 09:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-25 09:54 pm (UTC)http://www.cafepress.com/lkhprem.17937360 - LKH Print
http://www.cafepress.com/lkhprem.32481943 - Merry Print
no subject
Date: 2007-02-25 09:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-25 10:05 pm (UTC)And that Merry print is effing atrotious.
Oh my ears and whiskers. I can't think of any author who I like enough to put their picture on my wall, even in a tacky poster kind of way. Bookcovers sure (I would kill to have any of Jody Lee's covers, as well as the Kushiel covers)... but not author pictures.
LKH is going to have to make her doors wider at the top than at the bottom so she can get her head through.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-25 10:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-25 10:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-25 10:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-25 10:24 pm (UTC)Brett thanks for ruining a perfectly good mental pic I had of JC, with that metrosexual greasy looking pic. Its awful.
I must spork my eyes.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-25 10:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-25 10:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-25 10:30 pm (UTC)I wanted to double check to see if I was imaging it, so I put them next to each other...
http://www.tapfer.org/images/merrykh.jpg
I'm not imagining it. ;)
no subject
Date: 2007-02-25 10:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-25 10:33 pm (UTC)That Merry print is six steps past atrocious. What happened to balance? Color? DESIGN? And that font? The the placement? No. Just... look, is a tutorial on design that hard to find? Maybe her kid made it. I'll accept it as an effort if a child of less than 12, with 30 minutes of experience in Photoshop created it.
I won't go into the prices for either of those things. 'Ridiculous' sums it all up nicely.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-25 10:35 pm (UTC)Tonight, on "When Fanboys Attack!"
no subject
Date: 2007-02-25 10:37 pm (UTC)