Snappy Sue

Feb. 26th, 2007 02:07 pm
[identity profile] catskin.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] lkh_lashouts
Found this on Kit Whitfield's blog and thought of you, Anita.

Date: 2007-02-26 02:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] akaibara.livejournal.com
Anyone else wondering if Anita was the primary inspiration for that essay? XD

Date: 2007-02-26 02:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] missamii.livejournal.com
I'm sure she was, but I think Dante Valentine was probably also used as a frame of reference.

Date: 2007-02-26 09:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] witchwillow.livejournal.com
Y'know there was something about that book...

Dante's first book. I liked the story and some of the story telling and definitely the world. But the ending made me think it was thrown in so the protaganist wouldn't have everything and there were just raw rough moments that rubbed me the wrong way.

I couldn't figure it out.

Now thinking of it in terms of Mary Sue-ism and also a writer stretching so far outside of herself, maybe it begins to make sense. All I know is that I borrowed book two, but kept finding other things to read ahead of it.

Date: 2007-02-26 11:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] missamii.livejournal.com
I stayed up all night to read that book and then a read book 2 over four days. I love the concept, love the action, but I hate that Dante is such an obvious Anita Blake knock-off. I wish the genre would steer away from these women that are abrasive just to be abrasive. Can't say I cared much for Carrie Vaughn's overly passive main character, but can't there be a happy medium between wuss and super brat?

Date: 2007-02-27 03:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] witchwillow.livejournal.com
I admit that it took me a while work up to borrowing Carrie Vaughn's second book because of the passive protagonist. But then I realized that the character had gone through growth and change by the end of the book; sometimes despite herself. What more could I want?

And then I realized that it was a pretty good growth cycle for a normal woman who ordinarily wouldn't make waves, put in a circumstance where that kind of personality made her almost Omega by Wolfpack standards and how there's a necessity to change.

Which made me think about all the things that were hinted about but never really explained in Anita's world. Like was there anyway to change a non-dominant wolf into a dominant wolf? Was their personality growth? What happened if a high powered dominant man found himself turned by the full moon and suddenly he wasn't a top dog anymore? Would people try to kill themselves because of the dichotomy? Would they try to kill humans cause they could still boss them around?

The questions were enough to make me pick up the second book to see how she handled things. That and getting to watch the Supernatural Legal Status from the beginning

Date: 2007-02-26 03:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thekiwiwhoflew.livejournal.com
Agreed. It went beyond coincidance oo

Date: 2007-02-26 04:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] prettyclever.livejournal.com
That was amazing. I want all my 'writer' friends to read that. It's something anyone writing a strong female protagonist needs to be aware of, isn't it? It neatly lays out all the pitfalls so sneakily awaiting the unsuspecting author who thinks their motivation is simply a love of their muse.

Date: 2007-02-26 04:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dwg.livejournal.com
Oh, what was horribly amusing. XD Thankyou for sharing!

Date: 2007-02-26 04:42 pm (UTC)
ext_12572: (Default)
From: [identity profile] sinanju.livejournal.com
Anita and Merry were definitely the targets of that rant. How much more obvious could it have been aside from naming names? Lovely, accurate and sadly utterly wasted--even if LKH read it she'd miss the point. They couldn't possibly be talking about HER characters.

Date: 2007-02-26 10:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jadelioness.livejournal.com
It's like LKH read this and decided that is exactly how her characters should be. I think someone needs to e-mail it to her so maybe she can get a clue.

Date: 2007-02-27 01:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] delphinapterus.livejournal.com
Thanks for sharing. I think the sad part is that it's getting to be a more common Sue.

Date: 2007-02-27 01:07 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ctrl-issue.livejournal.com
While this Mary Sue is a definitely female phenomenon, the immaturity that gives birth to her is neither specifically female nor male. Instead, it's a crude understanding of strength as the willingness to get into, and the ability to win, conflicts. Other forms of strength, such as self-control and forbearance, require more patience and sacrifice than an undeveloped amour propre can countenance; as a result, Snappy Sue's displays are always cathartic and enjoyable rather than difficult and taxing. As a more conventional Mary Sue sucks love from other characters because an immature ego cannot, when fantasising about success, imagine not being fascinating, so Snappy Sue sucks victory, because an immature ego cannot imagine being wrong.

I think that this hits the LKH-nail on the head, and explains a lot. It could also explain why she Merrita likes submissive men so much - they'll forfeit an argument to her.

Date: 2007-02-27 05:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cicipsychobunny.livejournal.com
Even when Snappy Sue is wrong, she's right. Whenever she takes a decision, someone has to argue with her about it, so she can once again show her strength by putting them in their place; no one ever talks her out of anything. If she makes a mistake, it was an honourable one, and is generally there so she can fix it and look better than ever. She never apologises, or at least, not without getting to re-emphasise why she was right, and to enjoy the person (usually male) she's had a go at saying, 'no, I'm the one who should be sorry'.

HOLY SHIT, it's Danse Macabre summed up in 4 sentences.

Date: 2007-02-27 08:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ravenclaw-devi.livejournal.com
That sounds like Anita to a T, yes.

Date: 2007-02-27 10:56 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] drisoscele.livejournal.com
and the proliferation of Mary Sues rest squarely on the shoulders of editors and publishers who allow this tripe to escape the slush pile and see the light of day. Just say NO to Mary Sue!

Doc

Date: 2007-02-27 11:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nimnix.livejournal.com
editor? oh does she still use one of those?

honestly, what editor in their right mind is going to tell someone who sells that much that they should fix things? I doubt she even remembers what being in the slush pile was like.

Profile

lkh_lashouts: (Default)
LKH Lashouts

January 2023

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 12th, 2025 04:29 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios