BlogFlog: Mother's Day
May. 14th, 2007 01:09 pm![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
LKH: Emphasis
Me: Regular
We did our celebrating last weekend because Trinity is with her father this weekend.
I am probably getting the rarest gift of all for Mother's day. Time to myself.
I can't think of any custody arrangement wherein the child doesn't get to be with the mother on Mother's Day. I've heard of half-day arrangements. I've heard of combined Mother/Step-Mother celebrations. But not being there at all?
All I can think is that this is what she asked for - because ''the rarest gift of all for Mother's day. Time to myself'.
Considering she has dual custody of her child and thus doesn't have her child fulltime in the first place - what the heck is she talking about?
Also her child isn't a toddler who'll follow her into the bathroom and go 'Mommy can you get me a glass of milk?' Or a kindergartener who gets into mischief if left alone.
So what?
I bring this up not for the sole opportunity to bash LKH, but because this kind of selfishness and self-involvement seems to me to be part of what translates into her books and is why they suck and she can't take direction/advice/suggestion.
It also makes me think of Anita Blake (specifically) and the character's utter selfishness and how the world is seen through Anita's eyes.
I really wish it were possible if someone was messing up a franchise that someone else could write it better and get all the credit and kudos and money. Somehow it's just not enough to run circles around LKH in fanfiction. I'd love to see her truly threatened by someone else not locked into a selfish self-wanking point of view in exploring the universe.
It makes me wonder just how close could you get to mocking her in an original work? How close could you get to exploring a similar world? Would it have to be a strict parody? Or could you mention the brain-damanged Vampire Executioner who wonders the streets dirty and out of touch with reality and occasionally turning tricks on people with no scruples?
http://blog.laurellkhamilton.org/2007/05/happy-mothers-day.html
Me: Regular
We did our celebrating last weekend because Trinity is with her father this weekend.
I am probably getting the rarest gift of all for Mother's day. Time to myself.
I can't think of any custody arrangement wherein the child doesn't get to be with the mother on Mother's Day. I've heard of half-day arrangements. I've heard of combined Mother/Step-Mother celebrations. But not being there at all?
All I can think is that this is what she asked for - because ''the rarest gift of all for Mother's day. Time to myself'.
Considering she has dual custody of her child and thus doesn't have her child fulltime in the first place - what the heck is she talking about?
Also her child isn't a toddler who'll follow her into the bathroom and go 'Mommy can you get me a glass of milk?' Or a kindergartener who gets into mischief if left alone.
So what?
I bring this up not for the sole opportunity to bash LKH, but because this kind of selfishness and self-involvement seems to me to be part of what translates into her books and is why they suck and she can't take direction/advice/suggestion.
It also makes me think of Anita Blake (specifically) and the character's utter selfishness and how the world is seen through Anita's eyes.
I really wish it were possible if someone was messing up a franchise that someone else could write it better and get all the credit and kudos and money. Somehow it's just not enough to run circles around LKH in fanfiction. I'd love to see her truly threatened by someone else not locked into a selfish self-wanking point of view in exploring the universe.
It makes me wonder just how close could you get to mocking her in an original work? How close could you get to exploring a similar world? Would it have to be a strict parody? Or could you mention the brain-damanged Vampire Executioner who wonders the streets dirty and out of touch with reality and occasionally turning tricks on people with no scruples?
http://blog.laurellkhamilton.org/2007/05/happy-mothers-day.html
no subject
Date: 2007-05-14 05:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-14 05:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-14 06:05 pm (UTC)That being said: Laurell, there are adult children who would give a year of their lives to be with their mothers for one more Mother's Day. There are mothers who would give up ten years of their lives to have their children with them for one more hour, on any day.
All I gotta say to this is thank you, Laurell, for solidifying my hatred of you as a person as well as your craptastic writing.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-14 06:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-14 06:13 pm (UTC)Yes it's a made up holiday so people can buy stuff. But that doesn't mean that it's still not filled with sentiment. My flist has people who've eaten cold, crappy breakfasts because their five year old tried to make it all by themselves and who smile at stinky perfumes and put up with stains on the bedclothes due to over-enthusiastic hugging.
There's a certain love and self-sacrifice mixed with friendship, wisdom and companionship that's celebrated as a whole on Mother's Day. And she's not fitting the bill.
One would think, with all her talk about how losing her mother still affects her that she would make a special effort to be there for her own daughter.
One would think.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-14 06:14 pm (UTC)Which is why I related it to her writing and how Anita as her viewpoint character is so amazingly selfish that she really is the ultimate unreliable narrator.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-14 06:16 pm (UTC)I'm sure we can think of something to do here at home.
Maybe my mind's just perpetually in the gutter anyway, but this sounds like a possible attempt at sexual innuendo.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-14 06:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-14 06:32 pm (UTC)It does bug me that she seems to have chosen her husband's company over that of her daughter.
But, I guess I am reluctant to ascribe selfishness to her for this incident in particular, much less read it into her characters' motivations.
Having said that, I intensely dislike the way her characters have been behaving in the last few books, and think their characterization has been raped.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-14 06:34 pm (UTC)One would think.
Actually, you may have just nailed something that has puzzled me for years. My mother lost her mother (my grandmother) when she was 9 years old. She was raised by aunts.
My mother and I had such a strained and distant relationship I was practically raised by the same aunts. Like quizzicalsphinx, I can't stand my mother, and I won't document why. Suffice it to say that she has plumbed depths of creepy to which even LKH will struggle to stoop.
Perhaps losing her mother at a young age somehow stunted my mother's ability to be an effective parent, and LKH shares that problem?
no subject
Date: 2007-05-14 06:38 pm (UTC)Until then, I'll leave the baby-raising to people who actually understand what it takes.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-14 07:07 pm (UTC)But no sequels for you!
no subject
Date: 2007-05-14 07:24 pm (UTC)Well, I read the first one or two of the Charlene Harris books and I think they were partially a commentary/paradoy of LKH's Anita series. The were-dog, the rather inept vampire, the 'special' heroine who's a waitress, etc. etc. She did go on, as her work became independently popular, in her own direction but I'm pretty sure the first, if not the first couple, were parodies.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-14 09:17 pm (UTC)I've got my grandmother telling me all the time that it doesn't matter if I think I'm too selfish to have kids -- that once I have them, my love for them will make me into a good mom.
It's so nice to see someone who understands that being unselfish should come before the baby-having, not (wishfully) as a result of it.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-14 09:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-14 09:27 pm (UTC)But considering what I put my parents through, and their patience...
I can't do that yet.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-14 09:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-14 10:09 pm (UTC)FuckheadLKH might need more serious therapy than she's currently receiving.no subject
Date: 2007-05-14 10:30 pm (UTC)This shows what she was doing last Sunday. It doesn't sound much like a mother's day celebration to me 'Each of us doing our own thing'. But maybe I too am disturbed that she seems to have chosen her husband's company over her daughter.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-15 12:16 am (UTC)And yet lack of respect for her bleeds into so many areas and I end up thinking things like 'Is a lack of understanding about the true ties of family contribute to her writing?'
Or 'Is the lack of any true mothering impulse or skill part of why Anita couldn't mother or big sister Nathaniel?'
no subject
Date: 2007-05-15 01:04 am (UTC)How old is this child. Because so help me god, if she named her after the goddamn Matrix character, I will break shit.
Oh, and uh, yeah. I agree with the sentiment that Anita....I mean Laurell....doesn't seem to emotionally involved in spending time with her kid. That's something I find a bit perplexing, because I'm assuming that it's a shared custody situation, so it's not as if the kid is always there with her, so that "a day away from the kids" is a somewhat legitimate reward from the usual stress of being a full-custody mom.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-15 01:09 am (UTC)Fathers Day, I just tend to forget, so...uh, my bad?
Philosophically speaking, I don't really agree with a Speshul Day set aside for parents, because well, shouldn't every day be a Fathers/Mothers Day where you appreciate your parental units? Okay, maybe in a Utopian society, this will happen.
But for the rest of us mere mortals that do not get along with their families like the Brady Bunch, this blog is grating in the worst possible way. Yay, LKH, you celebrate being a mom and raising a cool kid! You tout your love for how awesome she is and you are and...
No wait, I'm getting confused with Neil Gaiman again. And let's face it, he probably would make the world's awesomest mother.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-15 01:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-15 01:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-15 01:32 am (UTC)1. She has one child. ONE.
2. This one child is in school for at least six hours a day, five days a week, eight months a year.
3. Going by traditional custody arrangements, that one child probably spends every other weekend with her father.
4. Since remarrying, LKH also has a partner to assist in parenting full-time. She is not a single mother anymore, and has not been for several years.
Granted, that is not to say that parenting even under the best circumstances is not difficult and demanding, but LKH has quite possibly one of the more ideal arrangements parenting-wise, so her constant harping on having to actually spend time with her daughter (diety forbid!) wears rapidly thin.
I badly want to believe that she is a good mother, she is, despite the vibes I get from her blog, for Trinity's sake. No one deserves to have an inattentive, resentful parent. I hope she's a great mom who loves her kid to death, and I hope that Jon's a terrific stepdad. I hope Trinity is happy and feels loved, despite being saddled with the name "Trinity" ('cause, seriously). But when LKH says stuff like this, I cringe a little inside.