Best review I've read in a while:
Jun. 2nd, 2007 04:30 pm![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
http://www.sfdiplomat.net/sf_diplomat/2007/06/review_the_harl.html
"...A systemic and catastrophic failure of the entire process of book creation from initial idea to writing to editing..."
It's a thing of beauty.
"...A systemic and catastrophic failure of the entire process of book creation from initial idea to writing to editing..."
It's a thing of beauty.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-02 08:47 pm (UTC)You are right, it is a thing of beauty. I shall send an e-mail to LKH with this link and then stare at her blog until she rants about another 'negative reader'.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-02 08:47 pm (UTC)I think he nails the major points for the last 5 books, and not just the Whorelequin
no subject
Date: 2007-06-02 08:50 pm (UTC)the subject of a spin-off novel.
...At least get the clan right.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-02 10:19 pm (UTC)And you know, I can see where one could make that mistake. There's so many damn were types wandering around in LKH's books.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-02 10:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-02 08:53 pm (UTC)That is one of the most delicious things I have ever read. :D
no subject
Date: 2007-06-02 09:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-02 09:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-03 01:08 am (UTC)If I ever became a complete asshole over something I wasn't even good at, I'd hope somebody would put me in my place. It's more embarrassing for LKH now.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-02 09:13 pm (UTC)This perfectly articulates one of LKH's most annoying habits: substituting actual characterization with a description of a character's appearance. That was extremely entertaining, thank you.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-03 01:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-03 03:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-03 04:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-03 05:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-03 05:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-03 05:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-03 09:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-03 06:43 pm (UTC)**(Well, not really.) ;-)
no subject
Date: 2007-06-02 09:16 pm (UTC)And I have to say, I'm incredibly pleased to see an outsider call Anita a Mary Sue. Especially someone who admits that he hasn't really read any other Anita books... coming in cold and recognizing it right from the start is a great vindication for the rest of us (right up there with there being a rule on the official board to not call Anita/Merry/etc. "Mary Sues")
I also wish LKH would start actually reading reviews of her work, and not look at the bookcharts. Hell, even when I get a paper turned back to me with a high mark, I always look through it to the comments below pointing out what I should have done better for next time. But I guess that means I care about the craft and not just the rewards.
I wonder how LKH looks at her writing... is it her career? Her job? Or her passion?
no subject
Date: 2007-06-03 01:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-02 09:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-02 09:39 pm (UTC)... scratch that, I like the second one better. XD
no subject
Date: 2007-06-02 09:47 pm (UTC)Here's hoping LKH DOES see that and DOES write a blog in response. The floggings that will ensue would be absolutely precious.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-02 10:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-02 10:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-03 01:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-03 01:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-03 04:41 am (UTC)I thought he was being kind of mocking. Calling Anita progressive is kind of like calling her a feminist. She's only 'progressive' in that she takes whatever she wants while still judging others.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-04 10:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-02 11:15 pm (UTC)OMG.
It was as bad as we've thought!
I wonder of LKH will think we paid that reviwer or that reviewer just 'didn't like being pushed out of her comfort zone'
no subject
Date: 2007-06-02 11:21 pm (UTC)Bwahaha hahaha ahahaha ahahahahahahahahahahaha ahahahaha ahahahaha ahahahahaa
*breathes*
Bwahahahahahahahaha
no subject
Date: 2007-06-03 08:07 am (UTC)I'm pretty sure those who wish to dismiss it will blithely use that fact to dismiss him, though.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-03 01:27 am (UTC)The really sad thing is, I like the idea of "The Harlequin", a shadowy, creepy secret vampire police. Pity she does the idea no justice in the book, by the sounds of things.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-03 08:10 am (UTC)Seriously! This bit of the review makes the book sound pretty interesting, actually:
"However, Blake is soon under attack as the Harlequins use their ability to amplify doubts and fears to sew confusion amongst Anita’s vampire and shape-shifting allies. Eventually the Harlequin try to enslave half the vampire population of the city, forcing Anita to battle them to the death."
no subject
Date: 2007-06-04 11:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-03 01:58 am (UTC)I'm only reading this book for the lulz. And I'm waiting until I can check it out of the library.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-03 03:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-03 04:07 am (UTC)BWAHAHAHAH XD XD
no subject
Date: 2007-06-03 04:25 am (UTC)What a great article! Thanks for posting this, seriously. ^^
(And somehow I feel just bitchy enough to mention... has the woman never met a Crest White Strip? WTF?)
no subject
Date: 2007-06-03 05:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-04 12:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-03 10:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-04 12:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-04 11:43 pm (UTC)I am not a fan of ragging on appearance, but there is such a thing as looking remotely professional. It looks like she rolled out of bed, slapped on some lipstick, threw on some product to keep the hair from being too obnoxious, and maybe threw on a pair of clean jeans with the t-shirt she wore to bed.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-06 02:57 am (UTC)Also, I'm no beauty queen either, as far as picking on someone for things that can't be helped in their visage, but hell, how hard is it to brush one's teeth, use a white strip, or match a foundation? Choose a better lipstick... anything that looks like she even cared a little, yanno? So yeah, I think you hit the nail on the head. :)
no subject
Date: 2007-06-06 05:16 am (UTC)I... ow.
Date: 2007-06-03 08:13 am (UTC)Ouch. Damn. OUCH. I feel terrible now, even though I kind of agree (although I'd have to insert a different LKH book title). These are words fashioned into a rapier, and aimed, and flawless bull's-eye, and DAMN.
Re: I... ow.
Date: 2007-06-03 09:08 am (UTC)It's very telling that she doesn't like fanfiction. She worried about some serious competition who the original works.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-04 11:03 am (UTC)Just one thing though... Micah is the "king" of the leopards not the hyenas. Unless for some crazy batshit reason that changes in this book. I wouldn't put it past LKH.