About the comic
Aug. 24th, 2007 10:44 pmI've been eagerly anticipating the Stephen King prequel comic "Gunslinger Born" (there aren't a lot of comic stores in my vicinity), and when I was reading up on it, I saw that it was originally meant to debut almost a year before it did.
So I was wondering, for those of you with more knowledge of this sort of thing than I, do you think that LKH was sorta jumping on the bandwagon with the "Guilty Pleasures" comic? She's shown a willingness to jump on popular bandwagons before (IE, calling her main character a "Vampire Hunter", etc).
Or am I miles off, and it's just a coincidence that this came out half a year after the ORIGINAL release date of the Gunslinger comics? (Note: this may be the case, just because I don't have the faintest idea how long it takes to make a poor comic book)
I've also been wondering about the comic's sales. Usually her book sales are good if brief, but LKH and Co. have been pretty desperate for cover quotes, and they've been pimping it pretty hard. Has it done badly, well, or neither terribly nor wonderfully?
So I was wondering, for those of you with more knowledge of this sort of thing than I, do you think that LKH was sorta jumping on the bandwagon with the "Guilty Pleasures" comic? She's shown a willingness to jump on popular bandwagons before (IE, calling her main character a "Vampire Hunter", etc).
Or am I miles off, and it's just a coincidence that this came out half a year after the ORIGINAL release date of the Gunslinger comics? (Note: this may be the case, just because I don't have the faintest idea how long it takes to make a poor comic book)
I've also been wondering about the comic's sales. Usually her book sales are good if brief, but LKH and Co. have been pretty desperate for cover quotes, and they've been pimping it pretty hard. Has it done badly, well, or neither terribly nor wonderfully?
no subject
Date: 2007-08-25 03:18 am (UTC)To be fair, 1-6 were collected in hardcover, not just softcover TPB... but they also threw in "bonus features", probably to encourage/entice more people to buy it.
And the "limited edition" Jean-Claude prints? The comic stores I frequent had hundreds left well after the release date, and were practically begging people to take them.
From the little I've heard, it seems like the hype is dying down. I've noticed a lot of people at my main comic store are dropping it from their files. Or, as my comic store owner said after reading issue #1, "I'm offended on behalf of women, and I'm not even a woman!" (Badly worded on his part, but he had good intentions.)
no subject
Date: 2007-08-26 02:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-26 03:42 am (UTC)Thankfully I did find homes for all of the ones I was begged to take. *L*
no subject
Date: 2007-08-26 11:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-25 03:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-25 04:37 am (UTC)Where I buy my comics, they also sell used books, and they advertise in the book section for authors who have had their work turned into comics. L.K. Hamilton and Stephen King were the only ones I recognized, but there were a handful of others. LKH does seem to be the newest of the lot though.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-25 04:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-25 06:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-25 07:11 am (UTC)What was the last movie you saw that wasn't --
1) based on a true story
2) based on a comic book
3) based on a book
4) a sequel
5) a remake
6) a children's tale
7) 2+ of the above
(etc).
no subject
Date: 2007-08-25 01:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-25 04:53 pm (UTC)Based loosely on Steven Millhauser's story "Eisenheim the Illusionist", The Illusionist tells the story of Eisenheim (Norton), a magician in ...
so says google.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-26 03:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-25 01:26 pm (UTC)Although movies have NEVER had original ideas. One of the studios used to have some poor guy who went rifling through the old silent movies to find new ones.
And I blieve the Illusionist was based on a Steven Millhause story.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-25 03:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-25 07:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-26 02:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-26 04:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-26 11:50 pm (UTC)O.o
You asked!!! :D
no subject
Date: 2007-08-27 05:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-25 01:28 pm (UTC)NOTE: I am not saying that good graphic novels don't have that, like Neil Gaiman's Sandman collection. It's just that I find that literary adaptations tend to.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-25 05:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-27 04:08 am (UTC)I don't think this is LKH being a bandwagoner. Marvel has just tried to create more of a market for its product (in a day and age where comics are probably selling as one of their lowest points ever) by branching out to people who ordinarily wouldn't be buying comics. And, I suppose, it's worked on some level, because the Anita book is sadly a hit, and trust me, it's NOT because ordinary comic fans are hot for it.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-27 05:19 am (UTC)Then again, I've been disillusioned with Marvel for quite a while now.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-26 10:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-26 10:34 pm (UTC)LKH's goal was to get women into the comic shops when a) we are already there and b) 90% laugh like hyenas at 'Guilty Pleasures' then move on to better books.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-27 09:02 pm (UTC)I mean yeah she thinks her so-called comic did that, but I didn't realize it was one of the reasons for making such a laughable nightmare.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-27 09:35 pm (UTC)My head hurts.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-25 06:33 pm (UTC)I'm a huge fan of the series (Dark Tower, not LKH!) and really enjoyed the comics, for what it's worth. And in the last issue they announce another series coming in February, not sure what that one is based on, though.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-26 11:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-27 05:49 am (UTC)