Unimpressive vampires
Sep. 18th, 2007 01:12 amYou know, I've been thinking for a LONG time about why I'm underwhelmed by LKH's vampires. Yeah, they have the whole foppish Euro anime charmer thing down (just once I'd like to see a good-guy vampire who keeps making social faux pas), complete with Lestatian Franglish.
But they're really kinda lacking in individuality or personality. As far as I can tell, successful vampires have to have basically two kinds of slants:
1: They have to be bad and/or powerful, smart and impressive, like Dracula. Aside from being the Sauron of vampire fiction, he's impressive because he's powerful, cunning and deadly enough to scare us out of our socks, and STILL has a personality. Nuff zed.
2: They have to have some unique slant on the typical vampire mythos, or the vampire has to have some kind of special personal quirks. For the former, think the postapocalyptic sci-fi world of "Vampire Hunter D," or the hopping Chinese vampires of "Mr. Vampire," or even the quiet, socially withdrawn Haji of "Blood+". For the latter, think Butcher's Thomas Raith, who's a gorgeous slob, carries a shotgun and a Cavalry sword, and can be as funny as his brother.
I think that once LKH's vampires fit vaguely into the first category -- they gave no new spins to the vampire mythos, nor were they quirky or funny. But they did come across as dangerous and impressive, and there was Machievellian scheming going on. JC was no Dracula, but he wasn't too predictable.
However... LKH basically destroyed that when Anita became the Powerfullest Person in the world. The good-guy vampires are emasculated ; they don't seem dangerous, they never plot or manipulate, and for all their supposed power they answer to Whorenita. The bad guys aren't able to do much either, and are usually reduced to lying in bed sending bad dreams to Anita, or sitting on the sidelines saying nasty things to her. Sometimes they even get into fights with her, which they always lose.
So summed up, her vampires are not really impressive anymore. And they've never been unique.
Maybe I'm being too critical, or too analytical, but this is the impression I've gotten. Does anyone else feel this way?
But they're really kinda lacking in individuality or personality. As far as I can tell, successful vampires have to have basically two kinds of slants:
1: They have to be bad and/or powerful, smart and impressive, like Dracula. Aside from being the Sauron of vampire fiction, he's impressive because he's powerful, cunning and deadly enough to scare us out of our socks, and STILL has a personality. Nuff zed.
2: They have to have some unique slant on the typical vampire mythos, or the vampire has to have some kind of special personal quirks. For the former, think the postapocalyptic sci-fi world of "Vampire Hunter D," or the hopping Chinese vampires of "Mr. Vampire," or even the quiet, socially withdrawn Haji of "Blood+". For the latter, think Butcher's Thomas Raith, who's a gorgeous slob, carries a shotgun and a Cavalry sword, and can be as funny as his brother.
I think that once LKH's vampires fit vaguely into the first category -- they gave no new spins to the vampire mythos, nor were they quirky or funny. But they did come across as dangerous and impressive, and there was Machievellian scheming going on. JC was no Dracula, but he wasn't too predictable.
However... LKH basically destroyed that when Anita became the Powerfullest Person in the world. The good-guy vampires are emasculated ; they don't seem dangerous, they never plot or manipulate, and for all their supposed power they answer to Whorenita. The bad guys aren't able to do much either, and are usually reduced to lying in bed sending bad dreams to Anita, or sitting on the sidelines saying nasty things to her. Sometimes they even get into fights with her, which they always lose.
So summed up, her vampires are not really impressive anymore. And they've never been unique.
Maybe I'm being too critical, or too analytical, but this is the impression I've gotten. Does anyone else feel this way?
no subject
Date: 2007-09-18 05:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-18 06:16 am (UTC)When we first met Jean Claude, he was a plotting, scheming, sex-on-a-stick vampire, who did his damndest to get into Anita's pants. And no matter what was going on, he always managed to pull at least one "Oh, did I forget to mention that? My bad." It's what made him fun.
That's what it was. They may have been stereotypical, but they were fun. I remember being afraid of Nikolaos, Serephina, and Alejandro. I remember when Asher first showed up, in his Morpheus/Matrix leather coat, smoking a cigarette. Duuuude! And attitude, damn!! I'm glad he got over his hatred of Jean Claude, but still, Asher had balls. Plus, he could fly. The Ahser that I loved was in Blue Moon, when he, Anita and Jason were discussing the werewolves coming to rape her. Someone stuck a hand through a window, and Asher reached up, broke the wrist, and kept talking. Now? He's a pussy. And I thought he was gay. It was my assumption, and correct me if I'm wrong, that gay men would run screaming from a cootchie. I think I liked him better when he was tortured.
Meng Die...WTF was that? She's the only adult female vamp, and it took both Jean Clause, her maker, and Asher, who's older than Jean Claude, to subdue her. And why? Cause Anita was glomming her men. I mean, really! Remember the vamps with Serephina, the rotters? One of them used to whip Jean Claude back in the day. Those were scary bitches. That's why I have a hard time reading past Blue Moon. At least then, everyone was more or less acting the same.
And if Anita can beat any vamp she comes across, seriosly, what does that say about Jean Claude's power base? People challenge him all the time, but that's because he's let his human servant usurp him in power. Soon they will see that jean Clause is vulnerable, and attempt to kill him. And it's LKH's fault, because she's really made him expendable to give her avatar a stage to perform on. You know, if Anita takes the final mark from JC, she'll be more powerful than him. Don't they kill you for that?
no subject
Date: 2007-09-18 06:45 am (UTC)The newer London crew of vampires are all pretty much stock characters. There's the Cheeky Brit who likes men (Byron), the Tortured Poet (Requiem), the Gangster of Gaudiness (Augustine), ad infinitum.
I attribute this to the speed at which she's churning out books. She sets these ridiculous "I must do xxx pages per day" limits on herself, and doesn't bother with fleshing out the newer characters. We get snippets that are revealed whenever one of them is complimenting Anita for something. Her writing process now is pretty much choosing pretty hair and eye colors, and hitting the Goth Name Generator.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-18 08:02 am (UTC)Give me Vampire Hunter D every time. Hell, even Count Duckula could take down Jean-Claude nowadays.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-18 03:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-18 04:22 pm (UTC)I love vampires and I thought Jean-Claude was pretty sexy when I first started the books. Since there was no sex he was even more so because he had to rely on word play and looks to get his point across ya know? And I've always loved Asher just because he was tortured and grr and I don't know lol that was hot. Now LKH doesn't spend any time growing her characters--unless it's time for the sex! I think it's possible to take characters that people think they know and do a complete 180 to bring back some mystery but she doesn't care about any of that.
Considering her vamps have been alive for hundreds of years, I'm sure there is ALOT we don't know about them. Alot of tricks they could have up their sleeves but since they spend all their time banging Anita we don't get to discover anything other than they love the cooter of despair. And if she wants smut in her books then fine but at least make it hot and steamy...not so damn monotone.
And it's not just the vamps; she has like a billion new characters and all we know about them is their appearance. What's up with that? If her books were a tv show people would be all wtf.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-18 04:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-18 04:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-18 05:38 pm (UTC)I have now given that up and realize he's just a fop with delusions of grandeur. He's not evena big bad. She is. And I can't figure out anymore how he became the master of the city. He's an idiot.
Sad, sad, sad.
Give me Carmilla, Dracula or Lord Ruthven anyday..err..night.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-18 05:45 pm (UTC)Actually, I *am* amused, but this is the VHD icon I have uploaded...
Date: 2007-09-18 06:20 pm (UTC)So true. (And, man, I'd actually buy another of LKH's books if it featured Count Duckula taking down JC. ;))
no subject
Date: 2007-09-18 06:40 pm (UTC)Course, then the Council sorta turned up in Burnt Offerings and everything was so. very. stupid. beyond. words. I say that because I always imagined internal vampire politics to be hardcore, like real cloak & dagger stuff with the clandestine meetings and everything. Only these guys show up to clean Anita's clock, she sexes them over and then they leave...ne'er to return except in astral projection form.
Because leaving a potential enemy as powerful as Anita is alleged to be is smart. *facepalm* I've been championing the idea that they'd return, that they'd use the human laws against Anita to really bring her down from her high horse (and why not? she's totally broken the laws she defends with her killing sprees), hang her out to try in the court of public opinion and then reduce St Louis to a smouldering crater.
But that'd take some kind of smarts, and those take way more effort to conjure than say, personality, or even a decent name. Oh, were I to ghost write the series...*wistful sigh* I'm crazy enough to see a way to actually salvage things and bring back the pwnage, but I know it'll never happen. I know it won't, so I'll just save those ideas for my own fiction.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-18 07:01 pm (UTC)it's pretty mind-boggling.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-18 08:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-18 08:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-18 08:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-18 08:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-18 08:57 pm (UTC)Re: Actually, I *am* amused, but this is the VHD icon I have uploaded...
Date: 2007-09-18 08:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-18 10:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-18 10:24 pm (UTC)I probably just misunderstood your point. You mentioned that successful vampires are ones that are a unique slant from the tradional and just I thought that the hopping ones are already tradional...or at least to me anyway cause I grew on those. Good memories ^^
no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 02:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 02:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 03:04 am (UTC)I'm not sure what type of vampire would be scary to me at this point but he won't be from France and wear frills.
Books don't scare me often at all. The last one that scared me was Song of Kali by Dan Simmons. Now that was scary as hell.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 03:50 am (UTC)Part of it may be comparing him to Jean-Claude, who sometimes swings that way but much prefers women. Hell, the reason Julianna was brought on in the first place was that Jean-Claude wouldn't be Asher's lover without a female buffer.