Blogflog: Who is the loser? EVERYONE.
Feb. 7th, 2008 03:25 pmURL: http://blog.laurellkhamilton.org/2008/02/jason-stage-name-take-two.html
So after the whole, "We has a winnar!" thing, and then taking it back with an, "oh no, it inspired me!" and leaving everyone confused about A) who won, and B) Alien, we now get a bit of clarification in the tradition of sense that's not.
LKH bold, me not so much.
Okay, you know how I said that no one sent in the name Ripley for the Jason contest? Well, two people sent in the name. Why didn't I know that? Because the spam filter decided since so many e-mails had the same header, Jason Stage Name Contest, it must be spam. Darla found about six or seven entries trapped in with the real spam. Strangely, two of those were the Ripley entries.
I TOLD YOU SO! DIDN'T I TELL YOU SO? This is what happens when you invite the entire populace of the internets to email you. I am now going to sit at my keyboard with a smug sense of superiority while I polish my crystal ball. I'd like to think that any half-competant office worker would have anticipated and dreaded having to check for the flood of emails, and would check the spam filter just in case. I know I used to do that when I worked for the government. And come to think of it, this whole thing reminds me of that far too much.
So, we will take the first person to send in the name and make them our official winner.
Which is what they said they'd do, but this begs the question, what happened to the Ridley guesser?
Worry not, my friends, as Ms Hamilton goes on to say that she thinks that the Ridley guesser should still get a book as the "two people [who] sent in the name Ripley, I never saw them."
They're ninjas! They're hiding as lamps and possibly dogs or even magical post-its in her office! That's where those two people are!
Annnd then there's more gushing of, "oh wow, you guys sent in the same name I chose! We're, like, brain twins!"
You know what they say, great minds think alike.
But fools seldom differ.
I feel so sorry for the person who was the original "winner" and totally pissed off on their behalf -- they won, she blogged it. She should use Ridley, and thank them profusely in the acknowledgements. Because that was the winner. Not Ripley, not because she was dylexic and thought it was Ripley and decided that was it, not because two other people sent in Ripley and O HAI that just-so-happens to turn out to be what SHE CAME UP WITH TOO OMG!!!1! NO. Ridley's the winner. I feel like I should send a politely irate letter, or leave a message on MeatSpace.
So after the whole, "We has a winnar!" thing, and then taking it back with an, "oh no, it inspired me!" and leaving everyone confused about A) who won, and B) Alien, we now get a bit of clarification in the tradition of sense that's not.
LKH bold, me not so much.
Okay, you know how I said that no one sent in the name Ripley for the Jason contest? Well, two people sent in the name. Why didn't I know that? Because the spam filter decided since so many e-mails had the same header, Jason Stage Name Contest, it must be spam. Darla found about six or seven entries trapped in with the real spam. Strangely, two of those were the Ripley entries.
I TOLD YOU SO! DIDN'T I TELL YOU SO? This is what happens when you invite the entire populace of the internets to email you. I am now going to sit at my keyboard with a smug sense of superiority while I polish my crystal ball. I'd like to think that any half-competant office worker would have anticipated and dreaded having to check for the flood of emails, and would check the spam filter just in case. I know I used to do that when I worked for the government. And come to think of it, this whole thing reminds me of that far too much.
So, we will take the first person to send in the name and make them our official winner.
Which is what they said they'd do, but this begs the question, what happened to the Ridley guesser?
Worry not, my friends, as Ms Hamilton goes on to say that she thinks that the Ridley guesser should still get a book as the "two people [who] sent in the name Ripley, I never saw them."
They're ninjas! They're hiding as lamps and possibly dogs or even magical post-its in her office! That's where those two people are!
Annnd then there's more gushing of, "oh wow, you guys sent in the same name I chose! We're, like, brain twins!"
You know what they say, great minds think alike.
But fools seldom differ.
I feel so sorry for the person who was the original "winner" and totally pissed off on their behalf -- they won, she blogged it. She should use Ridley, and thank them profusely in the acknowledgements. Because that was the winner. Not Ripley, not because she was dylexic and thought it was Ripley and decided that was it, not because two other people sent in Ripley and O HAI that just-so-happens to turn out to be what SHE CAME UP WITH TOO OMG!!!1! NO. Ridley's the winner. I feel like I should send a politely irate letter, or leave a message on MeatSpace.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 05:20 am (UTC)I find it vaguely worrisome that they seem to have this much trouble running a very simple contest. It does not bode well for future plot construction.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 05:27 am (UTC)Seriously -- people send in names, you pick one. Ta-da! How hard was that? Our poll for the names to send in for the comp was so simple, it hurts.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 05:36 pm (UTC)Sorry to vent, but it burns me that people can be so damn stupid. I think that dude would've starved to death if I hadn't switched the signs back.
(BTW, today is my birthday)
no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 09:58 pm (UTC)It doesn't surprise me that LKH is having such a hard time with this contest purely because if she'd run it straight she would have had to acknowledge giving up some iota of control over the series. I see all of this as an attempt to both look like the good guy and keep control over everything.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 05:33 am (UTC)It was HELL.
We did it for less than a year...thank gods.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 05:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 05:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 05:53 am (UTC)LKH: Send me your names!
NAMES: *are sent*
LKH: Oooh, I like this one. RIPLEY IT IS!
NAME: *is really Ridley*
LKH: MY BAD, BUT I AM STILL USING RIPLEY.
SPAM FILTER: *coughs out two more Ripleys*
LKH: Well, lookit! I'll give the prize to the first one who sent in that name. How was *I* supposed to know that the actual name I wanted was all the way over there in the spam filter?
RIDLEY: *gets no love* ;_;
...when reading it like that, it's like some bizarre admin officer soap opera tragedy.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 06:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 07:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 02:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 03:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 11:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-08 05:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 06:08 am (UTC)Darla 'just happened' to find two Ripley's in the spam filter. Riiight. I bet Darla was sent looking for those entries after these two fans wrote LKH scathing emails along the lines of - "WTF. I sent in Ripley. Prize. Now."
Ridley. Ripley. I still don't understand why she didn't edit her initial blog entry to fix this mess when she realized the name wasn't Ripley and she wasn't going to use Ridley.
Actually, I'm just shocked THREE PEOPLE thought Ripley was a good stripper name. ??? Lastly, I'm sad Sigourney has been sullied with a mention in LKH's blog.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 06:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 08:08 am (UTC)This contest is a hot mess. IMHO Ridley is not a bad name at all. The fan who sent it in deserved better treatment. Laurell probably doesn't even realize how she basically insulted that person on a public blog. Pretty sad. Yeah, I wish we could give them a kind word or something too.
Sucks to be the second person to send in Ripley also. Would it really have killed Laurell to just give that person some swag. Sheesh.
Still in shock.
Date: 2008-02-07 07:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 04:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 08:08 am (UTC)I hope he screams, "GET AWAY FROM HER, YOU BITCH!" at some point in the book. That would make it all ok.
She should give the prize to all three people. It's just a copy of a fucking book, is it really that hard to award the prize to everyone?!?! Not to mention, normally she lists at least ten names that no-one gives a fuck about in her dedications, adding three extra names instead of one extra name is hardly difficult.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 05:01 pm (UTC)You know, that solution right there is the easiest one of the lot. Which is probably why it's not going to happen, because there's no way the answer could be so obvious. *facepalm*
no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 05:32 pm (UTC)Ripley Longwood
Date: 2008-02-07 08:17 am (UTC)Rippley Longwood. It's a little catchy. Dare I dream? ;)
Re: Ripley Longwood
Date: 2008-02-08 06:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 02:36 pm (UTC)They weren't trapped. They were trying to escape.
Seriously how hard is to decide on a contest, read ALL your email, pick a winner from that email, announce winner and reward winner? Too hard for MPE that managed to screw up 4 out of the 5 easy steps. Team LKH for the win!
no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 04:14 pm (UTC)Seriously, I'd be mighty pissed off if I sent in an entry, someone MESSED UP my entry and then picked it and then decided it wasn't the winner because someone else picked the messed up one.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 05:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 04:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-16 06:45 am (UTC)