Just because she annoys me so.
Writers Digest
LKH in bold, and me snarky.
Of course the first few sentences are a mini-wangst about getting back to normal. For someone who likes to think she's so edgy she has a preoccupation with normalcy, which is subjective in the first place.
I am on the cover of WRITERS DIGEST magazine. I knew they had done the interview, but I didn't realize my picture was on the cover until Darla brought it to my attention on the web.
Writer's Digest Anyone? Anyone? I am unaware of this publication, and why is Darla around? If I were her 'boss' I would have been like 'two weeks of vacation, go be with family, don't worry about a thing' etc. I'm hoping she is taking a break from being LKH's slave and this was something she found in passing.
When I was an aspiring writer in my teens, WRITERS DIGEST was one of the places that I learned how to be a professional writer.
...Uh huh, professional writer. So that's where you learned to write lots of bad sex scenes and drivel? Good to know. I'll avoid it.
To be on the cover of the magazine now, would have blown my mind at the age of sixteen. It would have been inconceivable, to quote one of our favorite movies. But apparently, inconceivable really doesn't mean what I thought it meant, because there I am on the cover.
The botched commas and sentence structure aside she butchers Princess Bride quotes with her terrible commas and sentence structure. I swear...everything that I love *head-desk*.
"He didn't fall? Inconceivable!"
"You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means."
Most of the time stuff like this puzzles me. I never quite know how to feel about it.
Neither do we LKH, neither do we.
Writers Digest
LKH in bold, and me snarky.
Of course the first few sentences are a mini-wangst about getting back to normal. For someone who likes to think she's so edgy she has a preoccupation with normalcy, which is subjective in the first place.
I am on the cover of WRITERS DIGEST magazine. I knew they had done the interview, but I didn't realize my picture was on the cover until Darla brought it to my attention on the web.
Writer's Digest Anyone? Anyone? I am unaware of this publication, and why is Darla around? If I were her 'boss' I would have been like 'two weeks of vacation, go be with family, don't worry about a thing' etc. I'm hoping she is taking a break from being LKH's slave and this was something she found in passing.
When I was an aspiring writer in my teens, WRITERS DIGEST was one of the places that I learned how to be a professional writer.
...Uh huh, professional writer. So that's where you learned to write lots of bad sex scenes and drivel? Good to know. I'll avoid it.
To be on the cover of the magazine now, would have blown my mind at the age of sixteen. It would have been inconceivable, to quote one of our favorite movies. But apparently, inconceivable really doesn't mean what I thought it meant, because there I am on the cover.
The botched commas and sentence structure aside she butchers Princess Bride quotes with her terrible commas and sentence structure. I swear...everything that I love *head-desk*.
"He didn't fall? Inconceivable!"
"You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means."
Most of the time stuff like this puzzles me. I never quite know how to feel about it.
Neither do we LKH, neither do we.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-27 04:47 pm (UTC)...no, I don't know why they interviewed LKH. :/
no subject
Date: 2008-02-27 04:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-27 04:51 pm (UTC)You'd think they'd have more sense.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-27 04:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-27 05:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-27 05:58 pm (UTC)Re: OMG SHE REACTED TO SOMETHING I MUST SNAAARK
Date: 2008-02-28 10:05 pm (UTC)Re: OMG SHE REACTED TO SOMETHING I MUST SNAAARK
Date: 2008-02-28 08:08 pm (UTC)Anyway LKH doesn't seem to be flattered so much as she is trying to be flattered and coming off as just... well, LKH. In any case, why did Writer's Digest choose her? Is it the numbers of books she's selling or did she win an award recently or what?
no subject
Date: 2008-02-27 06:21 pm (UTC)As to how LKH got on the cover there is no denying Hamilton is topical and successful. (sad, I know) Talent alone doesn't land authors a lot of magazine covers. It would be awesome though if an article accompanying the cover was something like "How Not to Ruin a Book Series". I dream. ;)
no subject
Date: 2008-02-28 05:33 am (UTC)I would have gotten it... if only because the Princess Bride is one of my favorite movies/books of all times, but maybe it would have been better if she said "to quote the Sicilian" instead of "one of our favorite movies."
no subject
Date: 2008-02-27 06:34 pm (UTC)Then there's the part of me that pretty much thinks that what she churns out these days is pure and utter crap and she doesn't deserve to be on the cover right now. As someone who enjoys Writer's Digest, the idea that they'd be interviewing someone who I unequivocably would advocate to not emulate makes me wonder how seriously to take the magazine. That may seem a little harsh, but it really did go through my mind. What can I get from a magazine that interviews LKH as if she's currently a respectable writer?
no subject
Date: 2008-02-27 06:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-27 07:16 pm (UTC)But in the article, I remember reading a bunch of the same old crap that I've read about with her for a long time. For example, she went into the whole spiel about getting kicked out of a creative writing program because she was corrupting the other students. (yeah, I'm sure that's why--that whole story has always seemed very suspect to me.)
One thing that did stand out to me was when she was asked about how she felt about the criticisms she's received about the sex in her books. Instead of actually answering the question, or even acknowledging that her readers might have valid opinions, she goes on to say that it's because Americans are squeamish about sex. She says in Europe they don't care about it but have problems with the violence. I suspect she's somehow using that as an excuse to dismiss people's complaints about the sex. But, she clearly misses the point. Most people who I've talked to, and most things I've read online, imply that the issue is not that there's sex in the book. The issue is that poorly written unerotic sex has replaced plot. She continues to fail to grasp this.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-27 08:05 pm (UTC)But clearly she hasn't been reading European reviews of her work either. (Although to be honest, I don't think it's too healthy for any author to look themselves up on Amazon.) I wonder if she's just gotten to the point where she has to brazen it out, because admitting that she's been portraying the sex in a skewed way would cut into her fanbase, jeopardize her image or something. (Not that she has to make a public announcement. She could just... write it a little differently.) I wonder if she quite believes herself when she talks.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-27 09:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-27 09:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-04 08:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-27 08:25 pm (UTC)There probably is something to learn from Hamilton and it's not all a cautionary tale. She's created a series that even disgruntled fans keep returning to. Somehow she's created a bizarre sense of loyalty to her world, her characters, something. I doubt the article touches on how she did this or how she feels about it though. Anyway, she is super successful and it makes sense she'd be on the cover of a writer's magazine at some point. I don't hold it against WD. I wish they'd have pursued her more for an answer regarding the criticism though. Oh well.
Second thoughts about renewing my subscription...
Date: 2008-02-27 06:44 pm (UTC)And just because you've never heard of it...No offence. Google. You're already on the internet. You just pulled an LKH.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-27 08:28 pm (UTC)On the other hand, I'm also not sure how you can be unaware that you're on the cover of a magazine. I would have thought they'd, you know, need your permission for that. Or at the very least that they would have told her "Oh, by the way, we're featuring you on the cover!"
no subject
Date: 2008-03-01 04:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-27 09:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-27 11:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-28 12:15 am (UTC)