Laurell's writing style
May. 2nd, 2008 10:52 pmLaurell in bold. Me in regular
Recently I've been thinking about how Laurell structures her books. We all know that Laurell is focused on her page counts, but I thought that there was more to a book then mere pages. So we find out in this blog http://blog.laurellkhamilton.org/2008/04/no-fight-afterall.html that Merry wants to avoid conflict and Laurell is going to let her. (I can't even write that without banging my head against the wall.)
Still having trouble with this scene. Not only is it not going to be the big fight scene I originally planned, but it may not be a fight scene at all. Merry has figured out a way to simply leave in safety. I finally called Jon over the intercom and whined to him about it. He said a smart thing. "Whose whining that this scene isn't the big fight scene?"
I thought about it for a moment, then said, "Me."
"Whose story is it?" he asked.
"Merry's," I said.
"How does she feel about this scene not being a big fight?"
"Relieved."
I went back to my computer and made some notes, because Jon is right
Then we find out that Laurell structures her stories specifically to avoid having to read sex scenes aloud here: http://blog.laurellkhamilton.org/2008/04/videos-on-you-tube-and-my-space.html in this lovely passage:
Oh, and BLOOD NOIR breaks a rule that I've had for years. I put the first sex scene in a book more than sixty pages in, because most readings last about an hour. I read about a page a minute. So if the sex is more than sixty pages in, then I never have to read the scene in public. Well, it just worked out that the first sex scene is very close to the beginning of the book. Close enough that I'm reading it on the video, and you can hear the crowd reaction.
Call me crazy, but I thought that being an author meant that plot and pacing were critical parts of writing. Does Laurell care about them at all?
Recently I've been thinking about how Laurell structures her books. We all know that Laurell is focused on her page counts, but I thought that there was more to a book then mere pages. So we find out in this blog http://blog.laurellkhamilton.org/2008/04/no-fight-afterall.html that Merry wants to avoid conflict and Laurell is going to let her. (I can't even write that without banging my head against the wall.)
Still having trouble with this scene. Not only is it not going to be the big fight scene I originally planned, but it may not be a fight scene at all. Merry has figured out a way to simply leave in safety. I finally called Jon over the intercom and whined to him about it. He said a smart thing. "Whose whining that this scene isn't the big fight scene?"
I thought about it for a moment, then said, "Me."
"Whose story is it?" he asked.
"Merry's," I said.
"How does she feel about this scene not being a big fight?"
"Relieved."
I went back to my computer and made some notes, because Jon is right
Then we find out that Laurell structures her stories specifically to avoid having to read sex scenes aloud here: http://blog.laurellkhamilton.org/2008/04/videos-on-you-tube-and-my-space.html in this lovely passage:
Oh, and BLOOD NOIR breaks a rule that I've had for years. I put the first sex scene in a book more than sixty pages in, because most readings last about an hour. I read about a page a minute. So if the sex is more than sixty pages in, then I never have to read the scene in public. Well, it just worked out that the first sex scene is very close to the beginning of the book. Close enough that I'm reading it on the video, and you can hear the crowd reaction.
Call me crazy, but I thought that being an author meant that plot and pacing were critical parts of writing. Does Laurell care about them at all?
no subject
Date: 2008-05-03 03:30 am (UTC)I don't know. It just baffles me and seems...off, or something.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-03 03:33 am (UTC)I also couldn't help thinking when reading that latest entry on the blog as she went on about being nearly at #20 in AB and that being a 'special number', does that mean she might actually end the horror and end the series already? One can dream! ;P
no subject
Date: 2008-05-03 05:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-03 05:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-03 06:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-03 09:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-04 04:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-03 05:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-03 06:33 am (UTC)No, I'm not jealous, Laurell honey; I just know shit writing when I see it. :P
...hey, if Anita and Phedre met, would the universe explode from the matter/ antimatter collision?
no subject
Date: 2008-05-03 03:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-03 05:03 pm (UTC)But point taken. Hurg.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-03 07:20 pm (UTC)I think comparing the two and finding Phedre more annoying than Anita is absolutely ridiculous. I don't understand it in the slightest.
The character is consistent, the sex is well written, there are intricately developed, astoundingly well researched plots.. and the books aren't littered with spelling and grammar errors.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-04 02:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-04 04:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-04 12:22 am (UTC)Really. Phedre's masochistic, not stupid.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-04 04:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-03 11:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-03 03:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-03 04:13 am (UTC)I think her whole page-a-minute thing is why she's just so fucking horrid at book readings because the only way she seems to be able to meet that goal is by basically stripping almost all emotion from the reading and having no "flow" to the words. Not that her writing has much flow to begin with.
And come on kids, she wouldn't know true sexually liberation if it jumped up and bit her on the ass. She plays with sexual liberation like she plays with her writing these days and frankly, for our sakes, it should be something she does behind closed doors.
Morgan
no subject
Date: 2008-05-03 04:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-03 06:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-04 06:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-04 06:22 pm (UTC)This is from a reviewer I know.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-05 08:12 pm (UTC)(P.S. I see gwynethfar's Mulan icon and add one of my own.) ;-)
no subject
Date: 2008-05-03 05:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-04 01:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-03 05:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-03 06:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-03 06:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-03 07:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-03 07:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-05 08:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-03 11:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-04 12:23 am (UTC)Does this not speak volumes to the standard to which LKH writes these days?
no subject
Date: 2008-05-04 04:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-04 02:03 pm (UTC)