(no subject)
Jul. 13th, 2008 09:26 amWith LKH's recent wank on how the Merry book wasn't ending right, Merry isn't/wasn't listening to her, and how she didn't how the Merry book was going to end for the longest time, I've been wondering...
Does she think at ALL before she writes. I know some writers use outlines, and other's don't, but I thought it was kind of a universal thing that you know which way you want the book to be headed when you start to sit down and write. It should be even more important when you're writing a series because if you want to set something cool up in a future book, it should comply with what you're writing in the current one. This is, of course, slightly different if the series has a bunch of single book arcs, like a mystery series with no overall villain, plot, or character development... hey!
But really, even if that's the case, LKH has deluded herself into believing that her characters evolve, the MoaD will wake up one day and do... something. And if she thinks that way, shouldn't she have some idea of how she wants it all to end? It seems like common sense, but I don't think Laurell does any of it, based on the recent turn her newest "novels" have taken.
LKH has said that she wants to keep writing Anita Blake books until she, LKH, is old and wrinkled. Well, that's all fine and dandy, but I don't think she'll be able to because, personally, if you want to write for that long, you have to have something to write about. And that requires some planning and thinking ahead, which LKH has demonstrated that she doesn't do.
Does she think at ALL before she writes. I know some writers use outlines, and other's don't, but I thought it was kind of a universal thing that you know which way you want the book to be headed when you start to sit down and write. It should be even more important when you're writing a series because if you want to set something cool up in a future book, it should comply with what you're writing in the current one. This is, of course, slightly different if the series has a bunch of single book arcs, like a mystery series with no overall villain, plot, or character development... hey!
But really, even if that's the case, LKH has deluded herself into believing that her characters evolve, the MoaD will wake up one day and do... something. And if she thinks that way, shouldn't she have some idea of how she wants it all to end? It seems like common sense, but I don't think Laurell does any of it, based on the recent turn her newest "novels" have taken.
LKH has said that she wants to keep writing Anita Blake books until she, LKH, is old and wrinkled. Well, that's all fine and dandy, but I don't think she'll be able to because, personally, if you want to write for that long, you have to have something to write about. And that requires some planning and thinking ahead, which LKH has demonstrated that she doesn't do.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-13 07:45 pm (UTC)LKH has said that she wants to keep writing Anita Blake books until she, LKH, is old and wrinkled. Well, that's all fine and dandy, but I don't think she'll be able to because, personally, if you want to write for that long, you have to have something to write about. And that requires some planning and thinking ahead, which LKH has demonstrated that she doesn't do.
Ah! Why do you think she included so many characters in the books to begin with?? It was carefully planned! That way she can write a book about each guy and voilá! You have 100+ AB books. *snort*
no subject
Date: 2008-07-14 01:54 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-07-14 09:41 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-07-13 07:46 pm (UTC)Oh the irony, how it stings!
no subject
Date: 2008-07-13 07:54 pm (UTC)I'm betting the books are going to keep slowing down. A book will eventually only be an hour in the Anitaverse. The MoaD will probably never do anything therefore providing an overall "plot" goal for the series causing it to go on forever.
LKH will be probably die before Anita hits 30.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-13 08:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-13 09:06 pm (UTC)Just watch Friday's episode.
That's when everything happens.
I wonder if I should just start reading AB every five books.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-07-13 11:42 pm (UTC)I actually get the impression that the ardeur has gotten her into a terrible corner. How do you get out of a situation where a main character has to have sex constantly, and in increasingly nasty and fucked up ways, without killing her?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-07-13 08:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-13 08:29 pm (UTC)"Let's say a bunch of nympho vampire strippers from Las Vegas attack St. Louis because... well, who the hell cares. Too much brain strain. Vampires find Anita, they want to screw... cue ardeur and rampant sex. Vampires get jealous because she screws better. They have a screwing competition! There's a big metaphysical orgy which emits such powerful magical sex waves that it causes rainbow fireworks to go off and all the corpses in every cemetery within a 200 mile radius wake up and start trudging towards Anita, their master. The vampires are also all under Anita's control. And so are the wereanimals. Everybody is possessed by the rainbow sex magic and they are all slogging zombie-like towards Anita.. Anita.. Anita.. and then they tear her into pieces because they all WANT HER. The end."
Woops, so I got carried away with my own little fantasy there. But anyway... LKH's "outlines" are probably as thorough as that little paragraph of mine up there.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-13 08:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-13 08:54 pm (UTC)Rofl!
But LKH said she did have an idea in mind for the ending of the Merry book. She wanted gore, death, fierce revenge, but Merry refused to obey or something like that. o_O
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-07-13 10:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-13 08:37 pm (UTC)She does seem to be writing blind, and just keeps hoping for this silent "muse" to guide her. I am guessing she is not required to write a synopsis, or else it simply reads as "Merry meets more Fae and has bad sex with them. There might be some other action."
no subject
Date: 2008-07-13 11:38 pm (UTC)I can't help but wonder whether she's being quite heavily exploited, actually. I presume she makes a bit, but writers really don't make all that much, unless they are JKR with film deals etc. And she's supporting a PA and a husband and "security staff" and a child. Why doesn't JonBoi get a job?
no subject
Date: 2008-07-14 12:18 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-07-14 12:31 am (UTC)The two more recent NaNos I did (one being a sequel to the other) were written with a plot outline sketched out, but occasionally I'd get in a state of "wait, I'm here . . . I need to get over there . . . how do I do it?" Sometimes I'd plow ahead and muddle my way through, but if I was really stuck I'd dig out a notebook and pen and do a little longhand head dump where I'd 'what if' a bunch of possibilities and then figure out which one would work best and chart my course from there.
Judging by LKH's whining, she subscribes to the "plow ahead" method. And judging by the results, it doesn't work.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-14 12:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-14 02:53 am (UTC)But I did learn something from the experience at least; the "plow ahead" method was definitely not for me.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-07-14 01:35 am (UTC)Both writers had an ending point planned when they started their series. I am pretty sure JK Rowling had it planned to be about 7 books.
Diana Gabaldon (Outlander series, whose blurb on the covers of the Anita Blake books caused me to start reading these), I believe wrote her first book as more of an exercise in learning how to write a book. I don't think it was initially conceptualized as a series, but she also has an ending planned. She has just miscalculated how many books it is taking her to get to the end. (I believe it has morphed from 3 books to 8)
Diana is a much better writer than LKH, I can see her maybe endorsing the earlier books, but I don't think it does her any credit to have her name attached to any of the more recent steaming piles of tedious porn that the AB series has turned in to.
Outline? SHE don' need no stinkin' OUTLINE!
lkh doesn't use an outline. THAT would be the mark of a fully developed, truly mature and very self-disciplined ADULT. Besides, INMAGINE THE PRESSURE that having to THINK about making up an outline would put on poor l'il Laurell.
Why, I'd bet that she would have to give up fucking the boytoy, or writing her blog, or watching where she walks, in order to THINK about making the outline in the FIRST place! HORRORS, she might EVEN had to (GASP!! SHUDDER!!!!) FOLLOW the outline! That's TOO much like work for l'il ole lkh!
SHAME on you for usggesting that lkh WORK at doing what she DOESN'T!
Blessings,
-,'-,'-,'--@
Re: Outline? SHE don' need no stinkin' OUTLINE!
Date: 2008-07-14 05:54 am (UTC)1. Complaints about job, Richard, evil clients who want to hire her to reanimate. Phone call about somebody being horribly butchered, and Anita not caring.
2. Condemnation of jellus haterz/women/Christians/sex-in-a-bed people/tap dancers/Stephen King etc.
3. Sex scene with _____, ______, _____
4. Infodump with JC about evil vampire in town.
5. Sex scene with JC and Asher.
6. Argue with Richard.
7. Sex scene with Richard.
8. MOAD causes ardeur sex/beasts rising.
9. Weres take beasts.
10. More ardeur sex.
11. Argument with Richard. Richard stomps out.
12. Dolph being douchebag.
13. Sex scene with ______.
14. All the men talking about how much they want Anita/politics/childish dominance play.
15. Anita is injured by evil vampire.
16. Munin sex.
17. More munin/ardeur sex with _____ and ______.
18. Anita acts like she's going to hunt vampire, only to be informed he took the train to Chicago so Harry Dresden could whup his ass.
19. Sex with somebody else.
10. Recap of everything.
Re: Outline? SHE don' need no stinkin' OUTLINE!
From:Succubus Nightmares - Part 2
From:Re: Succubus Nightmares - Part 2
From:Re: Succubus Nightmares - Part 2
From:Re: Outline? SHE don' need no stinkin' OUTLINE!
From:no subject
Date: 2008-07-14 05:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-14 07:45 am (UTC)If I ever do write a book I will try damn hard NOT to realism-ise my characters to the extent that I don't want to go down a scene 'cause the voices in my head don't like what I'm doing to them. I think LKH has basically made Merry & Anita so, real, to her that they are people to her and she can't do anything meaty-plot (NOT that way!) without them doing it themselves, if that makes any sense whatsoever? So it's easier to just write the sex 'cause it's not making the muses be affected horribly.
Also, just lack of imagination and not knowing where to take the muses next doesn't help... *grumbles*