She's using spellcheck?
May. 18th, 2009 08:22 pmhttp://blog.laurellkhamilton.org/index.php/site/Typing_Speed/
Did I just read that right? Where in the everloving hell do you think that came from?
It's official, folks. I have now entered the twilight zone.
So I figured you guys would catch it, but she is typing with spellcheck on? THAT is new. I'm not concerned in the least with her typing speed, because, really? Who cares?
What I'm wondering with is why, after all the years of chronic errors in her books, she's JUST NOW using spellcheck?
I'm no grammar queen by any stretch of the imagination. But when I am catching errors in the books, it is a problem. That's why this is shocking to me. Do you think this new development will positively affect the error count of her books?
Did I just read that right? Where in the everloving hell do you think that came from?
It's official, folks. I have now entered the twilight zone.
So I figured you guys would catch it, but she is typing with spellcheck on? THAT is new. I'm not concerned in the least with her typing speed, because, really? Who cares?
What I'm wondering with is why, after all the years of chronic errors in her books, she's JUST NOW using spellcheck?
I'm no grammar queen by any stretch of the imagination. But when I am catching errors in the books, it is a problem. That's why this is shocking to me. Do you think this new development will positively affect the error count of her books?
no subject
Date: 2009-05-19 01:45 am (UTC)I have no idea what Laurell's doing, copying or no.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-19 02:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-19 02:13 am (UTC)Heck, I do maybe 65 for short periods of time, and I'm pretty fast.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-19 02:01 am (UTC)She's desperately backpeddling about her supposed typing speed of 200 wpm. After several people noted that the world's fastest typist did around 150 wpm. She doesn't mean she can type 200 wpm but she can type 200 words of random gobbledegook really fast. She never subtracts for misspellings as you are supposed to in a timed test. She's still working on her "short piece" rather than on the Merry book that's very overdue.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-19 02:47 am (UTC)...if this is true, then how can she consistently be so behind? Even working for twenty minutes a day would give her 16 pages. I call BS on her alleged typing speed.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-19 02:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-19 02:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-19 04:45 am (UTC)I can type around 100 words a minute, if I've practiced for a bit, but my normal speed is the high 80s or low 90s.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-19 05:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-19 06:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-25 02:57 pm (UTC)Despite this, people always say "OMGZ UR SO FAST".
no subject
Date: 2009-05-19 08:16 am (UTC)Okay, here's the thing --
Also, I encourage you to read the comm's FAQ (http://www.lashouts.org/faq.php), as all members will be held to it regardless, and this part in particular:
So if you want to expand upon your post to encourage discussion -- either by editing this one, or reposting and deleting this entry -- this is fine, but other than that if you wish to discuss specific blogs that the comm hasn't posted, please keep it to your own blog.
If in doubt, don't hesitate to get in contact with the comm mods and we'll help sort things out.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-19 08:21 am (UTC)any "word" qualifies - mistypings and/or misspelling. most poeple when they take a typing test are typing out something that is either told to them or shown to them
either of these add extra processing in the brain.
i can well believe, for short unsustained, unsustanable bursts, she probably does. for like a whole five minutes.
also, if i understand her "methedology" she writes and writes and writes. litle coherence, linking sentences add later, 90% of what she wrote is discarded...
after everything else is added in *esecially all the crap dropped back out* i'm betting its around 50wpm that is USEFUL. at MOST
no subject
Date: 2009-05-19 07:33 pm (UTC)What? Why discard it, sounds like a perfect example of her books to me!
no subject
Date: 2009-05-20 12:45 am (UTC)she may not be doing this anymore, i don't know.
but yeah... if what we get is the "good stuff", i am terrified of the filler!
(also, please note, that spelling of "methedology" was hers...)
no subject
Date: 2009-05-19 11:09 am (UTC)Also, I can understand that spellcheck may be irritating (I personally hate the red lines, I never turn spellcheck on while writing), but there's always the option to check the text after you finished it, which she, quiet frankly, doesn't seem to do.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-19 01:13 pm (UTC)>_>
no subject
Date: 2009-05-19 05:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-19 07:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-19 08:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-19 11:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-20 12:43 am (UTC)"what am i writing? how i am i saying it?" runs words through head. runs back through words. types words. stops and re-read words, fixing/adding/subtracting as needed.
most people only count the time spent actually typing in their "typing speed", which is why it LOOKS like it should be faster. and the actual typing itself is. but over the course of an hour (or a day, whatever) most people will be able to type more over all from copying, but its is at a lower rate *during the typing*.
did i explain that well?
no subject
Date: 2009-05-20 02:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-20 03:18 am (UTC)it also means that she, effectively, cheats herself. she won't ever really work to improve her speed, because she can tell herself how fast she is already. actually, thats probably why she makes the claim to begin with - she's rationalizing reasons to not try and improve. which means that we, the readers, are getting things ever more slowly, for all the various reasons.
which is the only reason i care. if i could quit, i would. but i can't. i buy every book as soon as it comes out. but she keeps building in extra delays... heh, maybe if she delays long enough i can actually quit?
no subject
Date: 2009-05-20 06:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-20 04:21 pm (UTC)I don't know if it's a mistake or a purposeful exaggeration, but I would bet the house that it's false.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-20 09:29 pm (UTC)I'm Just pondering because this seems a silly topic to write two blogs about.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-21 03:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-21 03:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-21 02:38 pm (UTC)If the publisher has to push back the date for Merry AGAIN they will not be happy, I doubt they will drop her but I bet if she starts to make a habit of it they will be less....generous...when its time for her contract to be renewed.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-22 02:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-22 02:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-22 02:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-22 11:19 pm (UTC)LKH is a best selling author, whether we like her work or not. So what is normal for your average write may not be how a best seller is normally treated.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-23 04:55 am (UTC)It's takes on average, 6-7 months to prep a final manuscript, edit it, typeset it, then print it, approve and edit it again before running the presses. Given that LKH is a best selling author, this process takes LONGER since they need to run millions of copies in a few languages for it's first run.
The original release date for the next Merry Book was October 2009, chances are the publishing company...under the impression that LKH is a 'Professional Best Selling Author' will get the final manuscript completed to them by April-May at the latest, and ergo start the marketing machine and pimping the book to various sellers and suppliers.
This is not happened, in fact the impressions are that the manuscript isn't even CLOSE to complete, it's so far behind that they have no choice but to push the date of release back two months (December 2009) in hopes of buying more time. Also note this is on the heels of the last Anita Book in which Laurel was massively pushing her deadlines to make the release date.
So...any early orders or sales of the book based on the October date will have to be canceled or re-worked...sellers also prep their own ad campains and in store deals based on the publishers release schedule, when this changes they ALSO have to make changes.
Given how many people are going to be FUBARed if Laurel DOESN'T get get act together and meet her deadlines. It not hard to imagine that there was more to the In Person meeting than just a simple business meeting.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-24 02:07 pm (UTC)It is shitty when writers miss their deadlines because as an avid reader I want to know what is happening (although I stopped reading LKH years ago).
But here is why I'm skeptical that anything will really happen to LKH. You have Patrick Rothfuss, Scott Lynch, and George R. Martin all push their street dates out by about a year from what it was originally supposed to be. Now, out of those three authors, the only one that might be in LKH's league in terms of sales(sadly enough...because they are better writers) is George R. Martin. But what do you think is going to happen to them? Will they get some pissy phone calls from editors and agents? Maybe. But at the end of the day they are the talent, writers block unfortunately happens, and these publishing houses will publish the story when it is done.
So is LKH fucking up the program by being late? Probably. Could her agent have come out there for a progress check? Maybe. But a "Come to Jesus" talk? I doubt it. LKH is a cash cow, despite the fact that we think her books suck. They've got to be nice to her. Her publishing house will just have to wait on her to get the story done-and I'm sure she knows it.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-24 03:33 pm (UTC)However her agents visit, while not a true 'Come to Jesus' was most definatly a 'Check Up' I have no doubt that given that the manuscript was so late it wouldn't shock me that the publisher wanted an update on it's status and sent the agent to see what the heck was going on.
If she's starting to slip on deadlines now, there is a chance this will effect her contract when it does come up for renewal. Remember its in LKH's contract that she is to produce two finished manuscripts per year, if she can't keep up her publisher will let her know.
Its up to LKH to be FIRM with her agent and publisher on what she can and cannot do if she needs more time to finish a book then SHE needs to call her agent...it should not take the agent flying down to check up on her, I'm pretty sure all the other best sellers you mentioned keep in close contact with their agents and publishers if there is a risk the book won't make the original deadline, nor to the other authors spend time mucking around with comic, layout, pencils, and final lettering approvals, toting themselves and producers of TV Shows and approval of merch for her books.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-24 11:17 pm (UTC)I'm a novelist, and I've worked in publishing, so although I haven't had a national bestseller list, I do know how it works.
Even though LKH is a big seller, she's not Queen of the Vampires anymore. She's not Merilee Heifetz's best-selling client, either.
Could her agent have come out there for a progress check? Maybe. But a "Come to Jesus" talk? I doubt it.
Doubt it or not, that definitely seems to be what happened. And that's why she's reacting like an angsty teen with her 'I'M DOING WHAT I WANT TO AND NOT WHAT YOU TOLD ME TO' on the blog.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-24 11:18 pm (UTC)Obviously, this should be "though I haven't had a book hit the national bestseller lists yet," though even that's not strictly true--I just haven't had a book hit any of the bestseller lists that actually mean anything.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-25 02:44 am (UTC)Unless I miss my guess, Merilee is a business woman and there are not too many writers out there just now with LKH's brand power. If Merilee upbraids LKH too much, Ms.Batshit crazy will just find another agent and Merilee loses that income. Ms. Heifetz may be rolling in the cash, but if she wants to keep rolling in it, she will be circumspect with her top clients.
Now, LKH is not the Queen of the Vampires anymore. That I do agree with. As far as I can tell there isn't one these days, unless you count JR Ward or perhaps the chic that wrote Twilight.
But to be honest, I don't truly think anyone ever fully took over Anne's crown. It is still vacant and waiting...
no subject
Date: 2009-05-21 02:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-21 06:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-21 02:41 pm (UTC)We all agree that Darla was more of an enabler than an assistant, hopefully the new girl was also present at the 'Come to Jesus' and realized what was being told to LKH and unlike Darla who would pay LKH on the head and praise her would make subtile hints.
"Hey did you see what this button does?" *shows spellcheck* "Isn't it neat? This is gonna help you SOOOOO much ^_^!"
I already feel sorry for that girl.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-21 08:40 pm (UTC)