And I get that the Daily Mail isn't exactly what you'd call a "reputable source", but his response still struck me as very unprofessional. If he had addressed their claims, or ignored them, or even gone, "hey, free publicity!" I wouldn't be bothered. But instead he made an ad hominem attack.
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2014-07-16 11:28 pm (UTC)And I get that the Daily Mail isn't exactly what you'd call a "reputable source", but his response still struck me as very unprofessional. If he had addressed their claims, or ignored them, or even gone, "hey, free publicity!" I wouldn't be bothered. But instead he made an ad hominem attack.