10 Ways to Un-Sue Your Sue
Feb. 5th, 2007 02:59 am![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
In particular, point 6:
Limit the number of encomiums they receive. An encomium is a formal expression of praise. It may be as blatant as a character dwelling rapturously on the protagonist’s beauty for four pages (why, hello yet again, Elizabeth Haydon’s Rhapsody), or as “subtle” as the protagonist overhearing a conversation in which the people involved talk about how good and brave and darling she is. This is exactly what it sounds like, a chance to exalt the protagonist to the heavens without fearing that she will sound conceited for thinking about her own good qualities.I'm doubly amused because I finally found my copy of Danse Macabre in the re-shuffling of the study and was flipping through both the Augustine and Requiem Monologues of Why Anita Is So Damned Great.
How many do you get?
One allowed a book. Two if the other characters are thinking to themselves out of the protagonist’s direct hearing, and never actually tell her how wonderful they think she is.
Yes, that’s an arbitrary number. I’m feeling arbitrary today.
I understand that, sometimes, there really is no other way to get the information about this character across to the audience, and if you’ve got a really self-depreciating or depressed narrator, their own self-esteem is skewed. But the best way to get around this is—ready for it?--show the reader your narrator’s good qualities, and flaws, in action, rather than having other characters whisper about how much they wish they were as beautiful as she is, or as smart, or as brave. At least, if you show us this hero acting like a hero, then we’ll be readier to believe in the encomiums than we will if you just have someone start babbling out of the blue.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-04 04:41 pm (UTC)All of these points are really good and can really apply to Merry/Anita and they NEED it.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-04 05:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-04 05:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-04 05:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-04 05:32 pm (UTC)she gains with every orgasmshe "borrows" from other characters - that whole thing where Anita can use the power of a vampire that uses the power against her first? HOLY DEUS EX MACHINA, BATMAN! And omfg, it's just so convenient that she can raise whatever superpower needed to defeat whatever she's against due to her metaphysicaly ties with everything.Doubly so considering that it doesn't work both ways and that none of the people she's bound to share either her powers, or those of people she's tied to. She's simply That Speshul.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-05 08:21 pm (UTC)Of course he wouldn't tell Anita any of this, because he is a master manipulator. Richard would probably find his ties to the munin even stronger, possibly allowing him to do things Raina only dreamed of.
But then, I'm reading from the Book That Could Have Been, not the pr0n version. In this book, JC is playing an extremely deep game, binding Anita to him, controlling who she has access to, being the Machiavellian nightmare he was meant to be. Maybe this is why I keep reading. She hasn't completely destroyed the possibility of a plot. She just has major pacing issues. (Sorry, I have these fits of delusion and... it's not pretty.)
no subject
Date: 2007-02-06 01:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-06 01:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-04 06:07 pm (UTC)Anita makes "emotional connections" just by looking.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-04 06:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-04 09:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-04 11:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-05 05:39 am (UTC)...
*shudder*
no subject
Date: 2007-02-04 05:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-04 05:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-04 06:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-04 06:59 pm (UTC)"To the person that sent the list of 'suggestions for improvement' - how dare you! If you think that you can write such a thing and hope that nobody will notice the thinly veiled attack upon me, personally, think again!"
But with worse punctuations. I can't quite bring myself to do it in proper LKH-style.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-04 07:43 pm (UTC)Oh, and there'd prolly be a line about nobody appreciating how much she loves these characters, how she almost buys Christmas presents for them for crying out loud why don't you understands?!!!!!!
no subject
Date: 2007-02-04 07:51 pm (UTC)Yep, must include that crazy somewhere. Gads, there's too much crazy to keep track of.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-04 08:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-04 09:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-05 09:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-04 07:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-04 07:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-04 09:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-06 05:27 am (UTC)-Dira-
no subject
Date: 2007-02-06 05:28 am (UTC)Grr.
-Dira-
no subject
Date: 2007-02-06 05:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-04 09:27 pm (UTC)Well, yeah, but... ♥ Achmed. And Grunthor.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-05 03:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-05 04:00 am (UTC)*de lurks*
Date: 2007-02-05 02:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-04 10:17 pm (UTC)Unfortunately the universe would have to turn upside down before LKH paid attention to anything remotely resembling logic.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-04 11:48 pm (UTC)I think LKH would do well to consider this one, in particular - 7) Put life and interest in other characters.
With an added, "No, 'life and interest' is not code-speak for 'impossibly long hair and a gigantic wang'," that is.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-08 03:07 pm (UTC)