[identity profile] delphinapterus.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] lkh_lashouts
LKH has turned into a rather guilty pleasure for me. I used to rec her books to people looking for soft paranormal fantasy novels, now any rec comes with a caveat, but that's a familiar story here. Generally I don't find real life relating to LKH and Anita in such a way that I can't think of the event or thing without cracking up because of how I associate it with LKH. Such is the case with famous Eve Ensler play.
The rest of this isn't work safe.

I went with a friend to the Vagina Monologues last night. When the skit "The Flood" was performed it was supposed to be terribly poignant and emotional because the poor woman just couldn't bear her vagina because it "flooded" the first time a boy kissed her. There was liquid everywhere and at that moment I just lost it because massive quantities of liquid spilling out brought to mind The Crotch of Doomtm and the infamous Rain Maker scene. So I spent the entire monologue desperately trying not laugh. It got even worse when the dream sequence started because not only was the "flood" filling an entire restaurant, so that people where swimming in it, and the earth was moving. Now I am left to ponder, was this part of the inspiration for the rain maker?

We all know that LKH is all about the empowerment of women, and she loves to educate us, her humble readers, about the beauty and mystery of the woman's body and sex, especially "kinky" sex. So I can't help but wonder what brought about her dip into the idea of female ejaculation and Anita's subsequent gushing.

For those unfamiliar with the original text, it can be found here
If you do a find for "The entire restaurant would start to shake" you'll get to the relevant part.

Date: 2007-02-25 07:22 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] witchwillow.livejournal.com
I'm not even gonna look. I've been sick. Laughing that hard might make me hurl and start me lying down and drinking liquids again for another 2 weeks.

But omg. Poor you.

*hugs*
(deleted comment)
(deleted comment)

Date: 2007-02-25 08:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] world-of-eos.livejournal.com
Ommigod. Your Vagina Monologues amuse me far, far, far more than the original ever could.

Date: 2007-02-26 05:24 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] saadiira.livejournal.com
Err...actually, it can still stay pretty tight after a larger man. It's childbirth or initial...err...looseness...that tends to make for hotdogs down hallways...

-Dira-
(deleted comment)

Date: 2007-02-25 04:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] missamii.livejournal.com
Well, I'm guessing that the whole female ejaculation thing was brought on to emphasize that Anita is a) manly and b) a special sex goddess. If I remember correctly, the rain maker scene is from Incubus Dreams. I think by this book Anita has cemented herself as a hard core misogynist. I remember throughout what parts I read she could barely behave civilly around other women. Notice how LKH tends to associate feminine with worthless if its trait of the fair sex. Plus, if I'm not mistake the rain making scene is also the first in which she sleeps with Nathaniel, submissive, pearl and apron wearing, Nathaniel. Clearly, she has to be the man in situation so she orgasms like one. Of course, I think my theory would be stronger if Anita made rain all the time, but I think this is kind of what LKH was thinking. As for the reason of specialness, hey, this is an author/character who thinks having nethers one could dock a cruise ship in is the measure of greatness. Anita can ejaculate, not all women can ejaculate, so therefore Anita is great and everyone else sucks.

Date: 2007-02-25 04:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] saucyirishlass.livejournal.com
Aw, I enjoyed the Vagina Monologues. My mother works for a domestic violence non-profit, and they were putting it on for free at a local tavern with a stage. I left feeling empowered, but I'm weird like that. And it could have been just wanting to strangle the obnoxious guys at the bar.

This was before ID, though, so if I'd read it first, I may have looked at it differently.
(deleted comment)

Date: 2007-02-25 11:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] saucyirishlass.livejournal.com
Girls only masturbation party? I seem to recall a sleepover like that when I was 13... Oh, I'm ashamed of so many things in my past...

I agree with you on the empowerment thing, but few people seem to really grasp the concept. It's like everyone thinks that for one sex to be empowered, it has to discredit the other. Neither sex is better, they're just different. Neither is inferior to the other. I just wish more men and women understood that.

And don't even get me started on the Bible. I've actually had guys say to me "hey, chicks can do whatever they want 'cause the Bible doesn't place the same explicit restrictions on them!" BULLSHIT.
(deleted comment)

Date: 2007-02-25 11:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] saucyirishlass.livejournal.com
Do you know how long it took before your icon stopped distracting me? =p

Anyway, you want to talk about revoking nonthinking people's happy bits? Go to the snopes.com message boards, to the "We've Got Mail" forum. I swear, I weep for the future every time I read the stuff there. A little part of my soul dies when I think of these people reproducing.
(deleted comment)

Date: 2007-02-25 11:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] saucyirishlass.livejournal.com
Can't say I didn't warn ya, what with all the weeping and soul-dying... *whistle*

Profile

lkh_lashouts: (Default)
LKH Lashouts

January 2023

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 4th, 2026 08:36 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios