Darla wants to play...

[saucyirishlass.livejournal.com]

Darla decided to join in the "Re: Author tells fans to go away" thread on Amazon. I've left my response, which is the same as I would say to any other member on that board. She doesn't get special treatment just because she's Laurita's minion personal assistant. I felt the need to suggest that she consider not using Jon as an editor. Was I overstepping my bounds?



"Some people got the point, others did not.
Laurell has never objected to critisism. But there is simply no way to please everyone. What one person likes, another hates. So critisism is relevant mostly to the person making it!

The original blog was in response to emails from people who said they found the sex or violence outside their comfort zone. Or that they liked static characters who did not change much from book to book. Or those that seemed to believe that they could threaten or intimidate Laurell and other fans in to sharing their opinion. Sorry, the world does not work that way. Not everyone enjoys the same thing. The fact that a vocal minority seems to think they can force what they want is just wrong. We heard from lots of fans who wanted Laurell to speak up and say something to defend herself and them. So she did. And other people too offense.

Should we be bold enough to suggest you stop reading, if you weren't enjoying the books, then the complaints flew that we were telling folks what they could and could not read.

Book writing is a solitary practice. At least the way Laurell does it. She does not collaborate. Her books are not written by committee.

There is simply no way to satisfy everyone. Make everyone happy. So for those who are not happy, then all we can suggest is that you do find a writer who makes you happy. It doesn't mean your wrong to not like Merry or Anita. It just means it is not what you want to read. That is fine. If it is not for you, then it is not for you. But, at the same time, if it is not for you, you do not get to impose on, intimidate or harrass other people who do not share your opinion.

Why is that so hard for some folks to get?"

I don't know. Why is it so hard for Laurell to write a book with plot?

URL: http://www.amazon.com/gp/discussionboard/cd/discussion.html/ref=cm_cd_ef_tft_tp/102-5715013-4957731?ie=UTF8&cdForum=Fx1OFHYU31CK06W&cdAnchor=0425217248&cdThread=Tx3KX37WDADL1BH

Comments

[karmyn75.livejournal.com]

I read this and I hear "blah, blah, blah, blah, jealous haters, blah, blah, blah, we are right, blah, blah, blah."
A vocal minority can't change things? Isn't that how it happens? American Revolution. Vocal minority overthrows the most powerful empire of the time and creates a new nation. Emancipation. Vocal minority speaks up against a wrong and has President free the slaves. Civil Rights Movement. A vocal minority challenges the status quo and gains their rights. Texas Revolution. Vocal minority challenges a powerful nation with an army that out mans them by thousands, suffers horrible set backs, but in the end wins their freedom.
A vocal minority making a lot of noise about their cause is how things get done here in the real world. I could come up with plenty of examples other than the ones I listed, but I have other things to do. So here's a great big wet raspberry to you, Darla.

[world-of-eos.livejournal.com]

. . . okay. I can see the point you're making, but please don't compare bitching about LKH to the American Revolution or the Civil Rights movement.

[karmyn75.livejournal.com]

I understand. I just object to her saying that a vocal minority never did anything good. Side effect of being a history major that has been taught to analyze everything as a historical document. It's almost impossible to turn off.