My friend and I, as we are prone to do when we're bored, have had an ongoing discussion recently about Laurell and Jon and what should happen if they ever got divorced. Now mind you, we are not hoping that they would - I wouldn't wish divorce on any couple.
Anyway, the point being this...
It seems that more and more, Jon is getting credit for doing ALOT of work on LKH's books; she's PUBLICLY admitted he's her editor, sounding board, working on a script, helping her review the comic book before it goes to print, and working with her on an earlier Anita story. My friend and I think this is one of the STUPIDEST things she could ever do. Because should one day, for whatever reason, they DO decide to get divorced, Jon now suddenly has a HUGE claim to the profits from Ma Petitte Enterprises. Even if they had a pre-nup, (which for some reason I strongly doubt), she's stated so publicly, so often what a great help he's been to her, and listed specific jobs, that it could very likely be challenged in court.
And if they don't have a prenup, given all of that, it seems like he could EASILY claim a huge part of the pie.
Which just goes to show us (at least for my friend and I) that for all of her UBER-SUPER-HEAR-ME-RAWR feminism, LKH is basically a stupid git not even smart enough to protect herself financially, as well as the empire she took years to build.
Agree? Disagree? Thoughts anyone?
Anyway, the point being this...
It seems that more and more, Jon is getting credit for doing ALOT of work on LKH's books; she's PUBLICLY admitted he's her editor, sounding board, working on a script, helping her review the comic book before it goes to print, and working with her on an earlier Anita story. My friend and I think this is one of the STUPIDEST things she could ever do. Because should one day, for whatever reason, they DO decide to get divorced, Jon now suddenly has a HUGE claim to the profits from Ma Petitte Enterprises. Even if they had a pre-nup, (which for some reason I strongly doubt), she's stated so publicly, so often what a great help he's been to her, and listed specific jobs, that it could very likely be challenged in court.
And if they don't have a prenup, given all of that, it seems like he could EASILY claim a huge part of the pie.
Which just goes to show us (at least for my friend and I) that for all of her UBER-SUPER-HEAR-ME-RAWR feminism, LKH is basically a stupid git not even smart enough to protect herself financially, as well as the empire she took years to build.
Agree? Disagree? Thoughts anyone?
no subject
Date: 2007-04-04 04:55 pm (UTC)Then again this woman's vison of feminism is so skewed it doesn't shock me at all.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-04 04:59 pm (UTC)So of course she doesn't need to worry about the possibility of break-up and the emotional, legal and financial aftermath. It's never, ever gonna happen. And besides, Jon is such a wonderful guy that of course he'd never do any such thing even if, god forbid, they did have a breakup.
She's blinded by Disney Chemicals (tm)
no subject
Date: 2007-04-04 05:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-04 05:06 pm (UTC)I do think it'd make an interesting case from a feminist pov though. Because how many husbands do say 'they couldn't have done it without the help of their wives'. But then a divorce happens and the minute the wife claims her hard work in making him a success, she gets laughed at. Usually laughed right out of the office.
This happens to this day. So Jon could be a study in precedent of 'the home spouse'.
That said, you are so right. He right now can claim to have helped with at least the last 5 books, and to have helped set up and establush the comic book part of the franchise and if she ever sells the movie rights, he has claim since he's apparently writing the script or it's been stated that he was to write it.
And then there's the slice of pie as part of her PR machine with his 'web site savvy'.
And if we've seen how she seems to have stabbed her first husband brutally from outside of her home, how much more wary would Jon be, should the unfortunate happen?
no subject
Date: 2007-04-04 05:15 pm (UTC)I'm sure that LKH is one of those annoying people who is SURE that the law is whatever some asshat told her one night at Denny's at four in the morning. On the other hand, her publishers have probably had an IP attorney step in to protect their interests, since she's such a cash cow for them. So depending on how good that guy was, we'll see if Johnny-boy is entitlted to anything.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-04 05:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-04 06:12 pm (UTC)And seriously, why do I never get fun and interesting cases like this in my real life law practice? If I ever teach family law, I'm totally using LKH as a hypo on an exam sometime.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-04 06:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-04 06:59 pm (UTC)The Now.
Date: 2007-04-05 07:09 am (UTC)Re: The Now.
Date: 2007-04-06 04:44 pm (UTC)That made my day.
Re: The Now.
Date: 2007-04-06 07:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-04 06:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-04 07:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-04 07:37 pm (UTC)People never think about stuff like this. Especially not when the 'people' would be Laurell and co. Ivory towers are dangerous places, and falling out of one hurts. But I guess it will be one of those things that has to be lived through. Maybe the books would improve though...
I would love to see what she'd do to Micah once his RL counterpart sued her for a share of residuals, profits, royalties etc. I think that would improve Micah, too.
Divorcees should be more careful the second time one would think, right? Erm. Then again they usually aren't remarrying to their fanclub president. Yikes. That just never stops weirding me out. She needs a reality check SO BADLY.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-05 01:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-05 05:10 am (UTC)...Dare I hope that when she and Jon divorce, that she'll get one HELL of a karmic bitch-slap? XD
no subject
Date: 2007-04-05 07:12 am (UTC)But when it comes to wondering what would happen to Micah, I do find myself thinking of my theory about Anita, the rape, Micah and denial. And wondering of Anita would just roll over in bed one night and blow his brains clean out onto the pillow an down into the mattress with a nice knot of silver in the middle.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-07 03:05 am (UTC)2. Even if he never helped and they divorced she'd have to pay him alimony. She loses either way, so she mind as well have the help.
3. She owns the copyright, not him. He'll never own the Anita Blake/Merry Gentry copyright unless she dies, and maybe Trinity too. If he tried to grab the copyright he'd jsut make her agents and lawyers laugh.
4. They are codependant. Something huge would have to happen for them to end it.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-13 01:22 am (UTC)Perhaps that's why Jon seems to fall over himself to be indispensable to her, rather than have an outside job and not pander to her apparent neediness, and why he is pushing the whole comic book thing. He would need to stay in her good graces if he wants to stay on the gravy train.
But then again, if she views a pre-nup as a statement of mistrust, and if she really is the product of the upbringing she has claimed she may view it that way - or more to the point, think that her husband would view it that way - then maybe she didn't.