(no subject)
May. 28th, 2007 10:09 pm![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Hello! I'm a newbie--found the comm through the Amazon discussion threads and Google.
Speaking of Amazon... I've been going through my recommendations and something hit me: there are an awful lot of vampire, shapeshifter, fae, whatever books out right now. I don't just mean the paranormal romances, but adventure stories, too.
"How does she stay published/how can they publish this crap?" (especially in light of the recent Harlequin spoiler) is a frequent lament here. It occured to me, just looking over the recommendations here, LKH going bad was perhaps a gift to publishers. People drawn in to 'vintage' Anita Blake and unhappy with the current books have gone looking for something better, but in the same genre. There is demand... and there are sales. Lots of sales.
So it's kind of a 'no press is bad press' thing, but it's in favor of the publishers, not LKH. They let her churn out her sexploitation dreck, and the number of disappointed readers grow, they look for other authors, other titles, other series-length stories. Then the publishers smile and produce several books with, "If you liked the early Anita Blake..."
Her sales drop, but they make up for it by selling other books, books that become more popular as more disgruntled fans say, "Hey, I know you liked the Anita Blake stuff when it was good. Try this!"
The savvy marketing isn't LKH's doing. It's the publishers. She didn't create the genre, but the decay of her storytelling ability created a market.
Speaking of Amazon... I've been going through my recommendations and something hit me: there are an awful lot of vampire, shapeshifter, fae, whatever books out right now. I don't just mean the paranormal romances, but adventure stories, too.
"How does she stay published/how can they publish this crap?" (especially in light of the recent Harlequin spoiler) is a frequent lament here. It occured to me, just looking over the recommendations here, LKH going bad was perhaps a gift to publishers. People drawn in to 'vintage' Anita Blake and unhappy with the current books have gone looking for something better, but in the same genre. There is demand... and there are sales. Lots of sales.
So it's kind of a 'no press is bad press' thing, but it's in favor of the publishers, not LKH. They let her churn out her sexploitation dreck, and the number of disappointed readers grow, they look for other authors, other titles, other series-length stories. Then the publishers smile and produce several books with, "If you liked the early Anita Blake..."
Her sales drop, but they make up for it by selling other books, books that become more popular as more disgruntled fans say, "Hey, I know you liked the Anita Blake stuff when it was good. Try this!"
The savvy marketing isn't LKH's doing. It's the publishers. She didn't create the genre, but the decay of her storytelling ability created a market.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-29 02:24 am (UTC)I'm interested in new Harlequin Spoilers. Since I refuse to buy it - but was happy it had Edward/Olaf (obsidian butterfly was kick ass). Where do I read spoilers? *L*
no subject
Date: 2007-05-29 02:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-29 04:49 am (UTC)Graham: (voice horse) You're blushing. Graham touches Anita's face and says, "After all the things that I've seen you do with all the other men, you're blushing because I'm looking too hard at you.
Anita: (Stepping back) You think I can't be embarrassed because I'm a whore?
Graham: Not true.
Anita: Isn't it?
Yes, Anita, yes it is. At least you can admit it out loud.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-30 06:29 pm (UTC)Ack. Wow. I'm bitter. I knew I shouldn't be reading those recaps. sigh.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-29 03:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-30 06:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-30 12:28 am (UTC)Who ties plain white masks to bondage and submission? Wouldn't the first thought be something like "theater" or "masquerade"? She's JC's girlfriend and she doesn't assume this would be some kind of costume party thing?
My eyes are already melting, and that was like the second or third summary post.
Granted, this is a summary by someone listening to the book, not actually reading it. In theory, this person could be missing a few key sentences or words...
Or, I could be delusional.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-30 06:34 pm (UTC)and we're queer" gift from the Harlequin? I know my first thoughts were "Why is the Phanton of the Opera in Anita's place... ohmygod SHE CAN'T HAVE ERIK."I've read all the ones posted up through Chapter 20 and... The recaps are probably way easier to read than the book will be. If only because the recapper is leaving out the urple prose and repetitive descriptions. But I have to laugh because the dialgue as per the recap shows how badly put-together the conversations are.
I'm all for delusion where this book is concerned. Delirum might be the only safe place to be while dealing with it.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-29 03:22 pm (UTC)Joss Whedon and Tanya Huff are rolling in their... ok, well, neither is dead, but you know what I mean
no subject
Date: 2007-05-30 04:06 am (UTC)So did a couple others.
And I guaran-fricken-tee you can find a few shorts and others going back to the greats of the pulp market of the fifties crossing the genres.
-Dira-
no subject
Date: 2007-05-30 09:24 am (UTC)