(no subject)
May. 28th, 2007 10:09 pm![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Hello! I'm a newbie--found the comm through the Amazon discussion threads and Google.
Speaking of Amazon... I've been going through my recommendations and something hit me: there are an awful lot of vampire, shapeshifter, fae, whatever books out right now. I don't just mean the paranormal romances, but adventure stories, too.
"How does she stay published/how can they publish this crap?" (especially in light of the recent Harlequin spoiler) is a frequent lament here. It occured to me, just looking over the recommendations here, LKH going bad was perhaps a gift to publishers. People drawn in to 'vintage' Anita Blake and unhappy with the current books have gone looking for something better, but in the same genre. There is demand... and there are sales. Lots of sales.
So it's kind of a 'no press is bad press' thing, but it's in favor of the publishers, not LKH. They let her churn out her sexploitation dreck, and the number of disappointed readers grow, they look for other authors, other titles, other series-length stories. Then the publishers smile and produce several books with, "If you liked the early Anita Blake..."
Her sales drop, but they make up for it by selling other books, books that become more popular as more disgruntled fans say, "Hey, I know you liked the Anita Blake stuff when it was good. Try this!"
The savvy marketing isn't LKH's doing. It's the publishers. She didn't create the genre, but the decay of her storytelling ability created a market.
Speaking of Amazon... I've been going through my recommendations and something hit me: there are an awful lot of vampire, shapeshifter, fae, whatever books out right now. I don't just mean the paranormal romances, but adventure stories, too.
"How does she stay published/how can they publish this crap?" (especially in light of the recent Harlequin spoiler) is a frequent lament here. It occured to me, just looking over the recommendations here, LKH going bad was perhaps a gift to publishers. People drawn in to 'vintage' Anita Blake and unhappy with the current books have gone looking for something better, but in the same genre. There is demand... and there are sales. Lots of sales.
So it's kind of a 'no press is bad press' thing, but it's in favor of the publishers, not LKH. They let her churn out her sexploitation dreck, and the number of disappointed readers grow, they look for other authors, other titles, other series-length stories. Then the publishers smile and produce several books with, "If you liked the early Anita Blake..."
Her sales drop, but they make up for it by selling other books, books that become more popular as more disgruntled fans say, "Hey, I know you liked the Anita Blake stuff when it was good. Try this!"
The savvy marketing isn't LKH's doing. It's the publishers. She didn't create the genre, but the decay of her storytelling ability created a market.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-29 02:24 am (UTC)I'm interested in new Harlequin Spoilers. Since I refuse to buy it - but was happy it had Edward/Olaf (obsidian butterfly was kick ass). Where do I read spoilers? *L*
no subject
Date: 2007-05-29 02:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-29 04:49 am (UTC)Graham: (voice horse) You're blushing. Graham touches Anita's face and says, "After all the things that I've seen you do with all the other men, you're blushing because I'm looking too hard at you.
Anita: (Stepping back) You think I can't be embarrassed because I'm a whore?
Graham: Not true.
Anita: Isn't it?
Yes, Anita, yes it is. At least you can admit it out loud.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-30 06:29 pm (UTC)Ack. Wow. I'm bitter. I knew I shouldn't be reading those recaps. sigh.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-29 03:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-30 06:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-30 12:28 am (UTC)Who ties plain white masks to bondage and submission? Wouldn't the first thought be something like "theater" or "masquerade"? She's JC's girlfriend and she doesn't assume this would be some kind of costume party thing?
My eyes are already melting, and that was like the second or third summary post.
Granted, this is a summary by someone listening to the book, not actually reading it. In theory, this person could be missing a few key sentences or words...
Or, I could be delusional.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-30 06:34 pm (UTC)and we're queer" gift from the Harlequin? I know my first thoughts were "Why is the Phanton of the Opera in Anita's place... ohmygod SHE CAN'T HAVE ERIK."I've read all the ones posted up through Chapter 20 and... The recaps are probably way easier to read than the book will be. If only because the recapper is leaving out the urple prose and repetitive descriptions. But I have to laugh because the dialgue as per the recap shows how badly put-together the conversations are.
I'm all for delusion where this book is concerned. Delirum might be the only safe place to be while dealing with it.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-29 03:22 pm (UTC)Joss Whedon and Tanya Huff are rolling in their... ok, well, neither is dead, but you know what I mean
no subject
Date: 2007-05-30 04:06 am (UTC)So did a couple others.
And I guaran-fricken-tee you can find a few shorts and others going back to the greats of the pulp market of the fifties crossing the genres.
-Dira-
no subject
Date: 2007-05-30 09:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-29 02:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-29 03:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-29 07:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-29 11:02 pm (UTC)Erotic paranormal romance is rampant, it's got its own section at the bookstore now, there's quite a few companies that do it, and I think that is where a lot of LKH's new readership is coming from.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-29 03:21 am (UTC)But publishers were going after similiar books before AB started sliding downhill. You could go so far as to say that the genre was thrown into the spotlight by AB's popularity, but that's not really the same as what LKH is trying to claim.
Basically, one publisher looked and saw what was going on and said "Hey, urban fantasy is coming back, let's jump on the bandwagon and see if we can make some money" and then a bunch of others started doing it, too.
After Christine Feehan got popular, a rash (and I DO mean rash) of paranormal romances involving vampires descended upon the unsuspecting public.
After Harry Potter got really popular, publishers began scooping up every "kids with magic" series under the sun.
Doesn't mean they weren't there before, that they weren't good before, or that they had not had popularity before. Just that as the market grows bigger, the exploitation of it does too.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-29 03:43 am (UTC)This was just something that occurred to me, as I went through all those book listings. (Some of which I've read and wondered if it wasn't really LKH writing under a new pen name, edited, medicated, and with refresher courses in Composition under her belt. Then someone posts a blogflog and I realize the hollowness of my fantasy. ;) )
I try to make logical connections where there aren't any sometimes.
::re-reads that:: I hope that made sense. (I plead guilty to PUI [posting under the influence] of Benadryl!)
no subject
Date: 2007-05-29 03:51 am (UTC)I was just can't seem to hold myself back when it comes to this topic. The rampant exploitation by the publishing industry these days is upsetting.
I'd like to be happy that the fantasy genre is taking in readers at a younger age now. I mean, I write fantasy (not of the urban persuasion, though) and I won't argue with a larger audience.
But on the otherhand, my sense of decency makes me disappointed that this sort of thing is happening anyway.
I certainly wouldn't be a better person if I sold my integrity off to the highest bidder, but I'd be a whole lot less confused.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-29 04:01 am (UTC)However, I like theory. It is what capitalism is all about-Creating new markets to get money. I just wish it didn't require so many brain cells dying to get to that point.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-29 04:26 pm (UTC)I also object to LKH getting big and popular (really, I liked it when she was sorta on the fringe, but that was back when she was writing stuff with plot) because of all the clones that have flooded the genre -- and I cannot express how entirely fed up I am with the clones, and first person narrative of said clones. Seriously, I cannot even begin to care about whatever romantic problems said girl with superpowers may or may not have. I want corpses. I want gore. I want madness. GIVE ME BACK MY HORROR GENRE, BITCH! *cries* Goddamned chick lit.
NEW book coming out
Date: 2007-05-30 07:32 am (UTC)So, though I don't think that lkh has invented this genre, I'm glad that there are so many new writers out there to take a look at. In fact I look for the blurbs on the books that say "if you like early lkh, you'll love..." You do have to wade through a lot of crap to get to the good writers, but thank goodness there is quite a variety out there. Some have been around for awhile and just get better (Kim Harrison, Kelley Armstrong), there are some promising new talent (Rachel Vincent, Ilona Andrews, Vicki Pettersson) -- and sadly there is lkh. Just as sadly there is me, who continues to buy her books, waiting in vain so far for her to stop proving that she'll write whatever she wants, as badly as she wants, as long as she proves that we (the fans, or former fans) DO NOT GET TO QUESTION HER HIGHNESS! HER HIGHNESS MUST TAKE MANY BOOKS (and a lot of your money) TO WORK OUT AND BEAT TO DEATH THE ARDEUR/ARDER/ARDEUUUUER whatever. IT IS SO VERY IMPORTANT!!!!!
Okay then....