Granted, It's not really much of a blog, but i couldn't let this pass without some mockery.
URL: http://blog.laurellkhamilton.org/2007/06/harlequin-excused-absence-note.html
In the most absurd move since having Asher make that totally OOC "sweet ass" comment, LKH and Co. have given us all a free pass. I really hope that they were aiming to be "cute" or something, because the alternative is that they believe people are going to gleefully print this out and hand it to their employer. And my money is on the latter, since in the final note at the end of the blog, Darla asks us to let them know if the pass was actually accepted.
I'm tempted to make my own LKH excuse notes, along the lines of: Please excuse The Shark from using her brain today. The Harlequin came out on June 5th, and she needs at least a week to allow her little grey cells to recouperate. Or....Please excuse Laurell from using commas today; her soul hath wander'd in the blackest, darkest, and moste ebony caresses, and nary a comma can she see.
Oh, and another thing, how hard is it to create a link? In the blog itself, you had to copy and paste that link to your browser in order to see the completely ridiculous Microsoft Word generated image. If this is the crack team of experts that are responsible for manning the ship, it's no wonder most of us have mutinied.
URL: http://blog.laurellkhamilton.org/2007/06/harlequin-excused-absence-note.html
In the most absurd move since having Asher make that totally OOC "sweet ass" comment, LKH and Co. have given us all a free pass. I really hope that they were aiming to be "cute" or something, because the alternative is that they believe people are going to gleefully print this out and hand it to their employer. And my money is on the latter, since in the final note at the end of the blog, Darla asks us to let them know if the pass was actually accepted.
I'm tempted to make my own LKH excuse notes, along the lines of: Please excuse The Shark from using her brain today. The Harlequin came out on June 5th, and she needs at least a week to allow her little grey cells to recouperate. Or....Please excuse Laurell from using commas today; her soul hath wander'd in the blackest, darkest, and moste ebony caresses, and nary a comma can she see.
Oh, and another thing, how hard is it to create a link? In the blog itself, you had to copy and paste that link to your browser in order to see the completely ridiculous Microsoft Word generated image. If this is the crack team of experts that are responsible for manning the ship, it's no wonder most of us have mutinied.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-05 11:28 pm (UTC)God but I really, really hope that's a joke. I really do. Otherwise it means her arrogance has reached an even higher level. If she keeps this up, she'll make Terry Goodkind look humble! And that's no small feat!
no subject
Date: 2007-06-06 12:03 am (UTC)OMG. *vomits* That's just . . . oh, fucking hell. Do they really think that book is worth taking the day off from work for? I haven't even read it and I know it's going to be crap. I'm looking forward to reading it for the comedy value.
But the sheer and absolute arrogance of that 'permission slip' is just galling. Actually, you know what? It didn't piss me off until the line "Possibly more than once." Before then, it was kinda sorta cute. Then it was just . . . oh, bitch, please.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-06 07:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-05 11:37 pm (UTC)I mean, I could see JK Rowling getting away with that as a promotional joke, but LKH? No way.
I suppose it could be worse. It could say something like, "The Harlotquin debuted June 5th and they needed time to read it. To absorb it. To roll its sticky sweetness around on their tongue and absorb it into their soul like the
arduerardeursweet inner fire I felt while writing it."no subject
Date: 2007-06-05 11:48 pm (UTC)Stephen King? No whimsy, even if some of his fans would likely take a day off and just devour one of his new books.
In LKH's case, I wonder if she realizes that for some, that pass signifies that they took the day off to wank to bad porn?
no subject
Date: 2007-06-06 12:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-06 01:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-06 02:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-06 03:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-06 05:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-06 08:21 am (UTC)Someone should get LKH some literary porn, Anais Nin or something, because if she really must write porn, she should at least write it well.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-07 07:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-06 12:34 am (UTC)Anita Blake? Not so much popular culture. Outside of people who keep track of authors on bestseller lists who would know about LKH?
I agree it's cute in a way. If she'd written it a little different maybe it wouldn't come off as arrogant and presumptuous. In fact, I think she should have written it with Jean-Claude's diplomacy and tucked in some innuendo. Then put his signature on it.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-06 01:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-06 02:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-06 03:07 am (UTC)You know why that is, don't you? *nods knowingly* ;)
no subject
Date: 2007-06-06 03:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-06 08:04 am (UTC)But I digress. I agree, she came off as arrogant. Very arrogant. And I had almost decided to buy the Harlequin. Then I come here and I loose my will... again. Thank the godesses.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-06 12:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-06 03:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-06 10:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-06 04:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-07 09:53 am (UTC)Howdy, folks!
Date: 2007-06-06 12:17 am (UTC)I miss those stupid little smilies...
Laughed my ass off at that link. I told my boss that I was taking the 20th and 23rd of July off. When she asked why, I said, "Cause the last Harry Potter book is coming out, and I'm standing in line Friday night, then I need Monday to decompress." I got my days off.
I might have asked to take off today if I were going to read that piece of crap, but I don't think my head could take it. I broke down and bought Danse Macabre, and I'm almost done with it...and may I just state how much better fanfic is? And how fanfic porn will make me drool, while Anita-ho sex makes me wanna cross my legs for eternity?
And I know this has been asked ad nauseum, but can someone PLZ tell me why it takes Anita-ho 5 pages to go from naked to sex? Why does there have to be a dissertation from her and assorted humps of the day before the sex takes place?
By the way...anyone seen the rest of the pard? Zane, Cherry...anyone? Did they die and I missed it?
Re: Howdy, folks!
Date: 2007-06-06 12:36 am (UTC)Re: Howdy, folks!
Date: 2007-06-06 12:43 am (UTC)*tackles you and hugs the crap out of you*
KTG actually posted a link last week, and I HAD to come. It's been two years since I've gotten to wank on Anita. But ain't that funny? And you know the troos are all a-twitter about it. Most likely cutting class than asking for a day off. lol
Re: Howdy, folks!
Date: 2007-06-06 02:19 am (UTC)The troos must be in *rare* form over all this, lol. I wish I could be a fly on the wall when one of them tries to use that excuse note at work, i'd absolutely die laughing. I'd get a big red rubber stamp that said "LOSER" and mark the note accordingly =)
Re: Howdy, folks!
Date: 2007-06-06 03:20 am (UTC)And I need to re-friend you, I think. You had the strikethrough, and I was all WTF???
Anyway, so glad to catch you here. There ain't no way I'm touching this new book, not even with Edward in it. I think Edward should blow her skanky ass away.
Re: Howdy, folks!
Date: 2007-06-06 01:24 am (UTC)I'm sure she will chock that up to "another dropped ball...sorry folks!" in her next podcast.
And there has to be dissertation and 5 pages of wangst because otherwise, the book would only be about 10 pages long :|
Re: Howdy, folks!
Date: 2007-06-06 03:58 am (UTC)didn't Jason have warm, fuzzy feelings about Cherry at some point? Wasn't he watching her sleeping with a fond or longing expression or something?
I recall Anita noticing and of course dismissing it as unimportant. Then not following up on it with a question since he wasn't admiring her. I thought it was Jason and Cherry. But maybe it was Zane and Cherry? Or Jason and somebody else. :s
Re: Howdy, folks!
Date: 2007-06-06 04:04 am (UTC)Re: Howdy, folks!
Date: 2007-06-06 06:30 am (UTC)I remembered Zane having someone, but I forgot it was Cherry. Doh.
Viv, Gregory and Stephen I can barely remember. It's been so long since they've been around in a book.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-06 02:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-06 04:34 am (UTC)I'm just glad that there's an OTHER section so I can fill in, "life" or "existence" because dude, if I actually took this note to someone, I would be disowned from this dimension so damned fast (and probably with the help of a punch to the face).
Course, now we need to set up an Abused Punctuation Shelter, where all those poor commas can have some hope for the future.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-06 04:56 am (UTC)*gives you the internets*
no subject
Date: 2007-06-06 05:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-06 08:19 am (UTC)One correction though, it's 'vicinity' I think? Anyway, it's hilarious!
no subject
Date: 2007-06-06 04:02 pm (UTC)Oh well, at least I'm keeping my 98% accuracy up.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-06 05:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-06 05:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-06 05:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-06 06:11 am (UTC)Laurell applies extremely heavy pressure, which is a sign of an artistic personality and high libido, but her vertical baseline indicates rigidity, inhibition, and fear of losing control. Her inflated upper loops are a sign of overcompensation for inferiority, and a need for constant reassurance, leading to exaggeration and boastfulness to compensate for her secretly low self-image. The signature is more or less even, and the lack of slope indicates self-control. There appears to be a "sham garland" (heavy and retraced) in the A and U, which indicates a socially repressed personality, someone who cannot express aggression in public and prefers to put on a cheerful front even with enemies. In general garland formation writers are passive and maternal.
Her handwriting is exaggeratedly round, which can be indicative of immaturity and possessiveness. The loopiness can be a sign of excessive emotional need (e.g.) and repressed feelings. The looped T again indicates an artistic personality and a need for emotional support from those around her. The blotched dot over the I indicates materialism. The K indicates ambition. Interestingly, there are careless jerks in the signature (notice the way the N lifts up), indicating a possible influence of illness or drugs.
In A Nutshell: The signature indicates immaturity, an inflated ego, inhibition, dependence on inner fantasy, and general dishonesty.
If I am in any way inaccurate or misinformed, please do not hesitate to correct me...it's hard to do this going strictly off a book in one's lap.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-06 03:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-06 04:45 pm (UTC)How the hell do you even read an AB book in one day? They're a thousand pages each of endless, pointless discussions and endless, pointless sex scenes! How do you read that all in one go without losing your mind?
no subject
Date: 2007-06-07 12:25 am (UTC)You skim the first two pages and toss the rest into a fire. Done. Slogging through those two pages will take the entire day, what with the constant brainbleach and eyeball scrubbing.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-06 05:56 pm (UTC)Am half-tempted to put something mean like "sanity" by Other and send it to LKH instead.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-09 03:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-21 08:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-24 04:03 am (UTC)