Blogity Flogity
Aug. 24th, 2007 04:20 pmA slight flog of LKH's two latest blog offerings, in which our author confirms suspicions she just can't be bothered following through with research - even into her own universe.
Does the constant reference to just how many pages she produces each day annoy the hell out of anyone else? I know she's the queen of over-share but perhaps if she just STFU, sat down and didn't angst about how many pages she was producing the quality would rise... Who am I kidding - it's the quantity not quality, must remember it's all about the size with Miss L.K.
She doesn't care at all anymore - the books aren't ever going to get better are they? *cue the tiny violin*
Wednesday August 22 - http://blog.laurellkhamilton.org/2007/08/rereading.html - permalink
LKH in Italics - bold emphasis added by me
LKH in Italics - bold emphasis added by me
Threw out the two pages from yesterday. Pretty sure what's wrong. Rewrote a page, then spent the rest of the day researching.
Does the constant reference to just how many pages she produces each day annoy the hell out of anyone else? I know she's the queen of over-share but perhaps if she just STFU, sat down and didn't angst about how many pages she was producing the quality would rise... Who am I kidding - it's the quantity not quality, must remember it's all about the size with Miss L.K.
But not in an outside source. Researching in my own books. You guys reread the books. I do not. Some of you tell me that you reread all the books from the beginning every time a new book comes out. Wow. That is why you will win at Anita Blake trivia and I won't. But when I said in an earlier blog that plot threads from an earlier book are going to be followed up on, I wasn't joking. I had to find scenes from four different books today before I could be prepared to finish the current scene tomorrow.Oh. My. Sweet. Darkity-darkness... is she going to use a plot? Is she going to use a plot with cohesive foreshadowing (is it even foreshadowing if you have to research to find it)?! Don't hold your breath Lashers because the very next day...
Thursday August 23 - http://blog.laurellkhamilton.org/2007/08/sometimes-you-have-to-give-up-to-get.html - permalink
LKH in Italics - bold emphasis added by me
LKH in Italics - bold emphasis added by me
I started the day in a bad mood. I didn't get to my desk until nearly two o'clock in the afternoon. That's never good. Then I sat there and stared at the screen and thought, why isn't this working? Why have I stalled out completely? Then the answer came to me? I had been pushing myself for days to finish a scene, maybe I didn't need the scene.That's right that intensive day of research to strengthen the plot was all for naught, what a shock! So much easier to just rely on our good friend Exposition!
So, as much as I hated to do it, I dropped back nine pages, kissed them good-bye, and started this chapter over. I wasn't sure it was the right thing to do, at first, then I began to pick up steam. I realized that everything I'd been attempting to put on stage could be found out in dialogue, and it moved the plot ahead a lot more quickly. Yea!
She doesn't care at all anymore - the books aren't ever going to get better are they? *cue the tiny violin*
no subject
Date: 2007-08-24 06:48 am (UTC)... ow, my head. I thought the rule was that you should show and not tell. Doesn't dialogue just... tell?
At least now we know why everyone has to spout exposition constantly: It's easier than showing you. Nevermind the pages and pages of insanely boring dialogue that ensue.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-24 01:05 pm (UTC)"We have to do this now!" Nathaniel was eager like a puppy and smelled of vanilla.
I was confused. "Why?"
Jean-Claude was wearing a lot of leather. [...3 pages omitted...] "Why, ma petite, we must do it now because of this."
I remembered this. It was all because of [...3 pages of internal monologue omitted...] "So that's why we have to do this?"
"Yes," said Jean-Claude. "Shall we go?"
We headed for the limo. We were travelling by limo because [...3 pages of internal monologue copy/pasted from Incubus Dreams omitted...]
As opposed to a difficult, complex scene where stuff actually happens.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-08-24 07:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-24 08:10 am (UTC)And the 'I never reread my books" thing always boggles my mind. "I'll never win an Anita Blake trivia contest" my ass she's the fucking author and fuck trivia she doesn't even remember important character traits. Like oh, I don't know, Sylvie suddenly not doing girls. God, it makes me want to spit. And she seems so proud of it! What the fucking fuck.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-24 08:38 am (UTC)Now that you mention it, it really does. When I write I don't even bother to look at page count honestly. I usually go by how many kb the word doc is and if I think it's big enough then I wrap things up because you can have 45 pages but they can all be crap. And we know she knows about producing crap.
Also for as deep into Anita as she appears to be, you'd think she would know everything about her or at LEAST keep the important things written down. I know teenagers who are more organized than she is.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-26 04:14 am (UTC)It's not like we're keeping count, or really care how long her novella has turned out to be (On a side note: what does it say about her tripod that he couldn't sustain a glorified short story with his sparkling peenie... uh, personality, but Jason's is stretching into another long book?)
Quality, not quantity! Susanna Clarke took ten years to write her opus! Okay, it's a big fat chunk of a book, but guess how many pages a day (on average) that comes out to when you calculate it.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-24 08:42 am (UTC)Ten bucks says, LKH is copying and pasting scene from older books. Look at MICAH, the scene with Micah and Anita talking about his big "tool". Remind you of the scene in ID, where Richard is talking to Anita about his big "tool"?
Did it once and will probably do it again.
You guys reread the books. I do not. Some of you tell me that you reread all the books from the beginning every time a new book comes out. Wow. That is why you will win at Anita Blake trivia and I won't.
This is the reason why LKH can't remember how to write the characters. This is also the reason why she makes someone gay over five books and "forgets" that said character is STILL gay.
I had to find scenes from four different books today before I could be prepared to finish the current scene tomorrow.
COPY AND PASTE
no subject
Date: 2007-08-24 09:29 am (UTC)You know, I'm not asking her to have every detail of the Blake-verse worked out in Excel spreadsheet format. I'm not demanding that she have instant recollection of every single fact there is to know about everything in her books. But I don't think it's too much to ask, given that she's writing a fricking series that she have some Goddamn continuity. It's not difficult - it just takes a little preparation so that she has a good idea of what she's already written and can make sure she's consistent with it. Professional writers do that - it's called "Respect for the Craft and Respect for the Reader".
God, that woman is such a fricking hack it makes my arteries throb.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-25 05:31 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-08-24 09:47 am (UTC)I'm only two books into my series and I have an entire folder dedicated to "trivia," or, as I call it, all the important facts I need for continuity purposes. But hey, each to their own, I guess.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-24 11:26 am (UTC)She admits she doesn't know her own continuity?
no subject
Date: 2007-08-24 01:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-24 06:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-24 02:07 pm (UTC)...But that would probably make too much sense.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-24 02:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-26 11:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-08-24 03:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-24 06:54 pm (UTC)Am I still the only person that liked the Vampire Chronicles?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-08-24 04:04 pm (UTC)Of course it seems LKH is above this petty form we like to call 'novel' or 'novella' writing.
"Novel-lite" should be drug out into the street and shot (as my favorite cartoon cat used to say) totally not a real word. {/end mini-rant}
I don't remember who said it before, but I'll point it out again. This series is turning into a soap opera. Talking, wangsting, talking, wangsting, smidgen of any content worth seeing/reading.
*Sigh* One day she'll be stifled under the deluge of better writing her failures of novels have inspired. No doubt they'll be full of delightful snark about how things should really be, subtley jibing her all the merry way. Then we can all rejoice.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-26 11:28 pm (UTC)LKH just makes it wangsty
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-08-24 04:10 pm (UTC)OMG!!!
*headdesk*
She completely fails as a writer. Completely and utterly.
I mean, I can understand a scene not working but you don't want to give up what you've already written so it seems to halt you in your paces. I can agree with scapping those pages, but not so you can tell it. No, you scrap the pages so you can try the scene again from a different angle or with a different slant on it.
It's called writing LKH, look it up.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-24 04:21 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-08-24 04:19 pm (UTC)I need a drink after reading this, and it's not yet 10am.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-24 04:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-24 04:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-25 09:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-25 12:29 am (UTC)But yeah, this is ridiculous. If it isn't somebody giving a mini-bio of himself/herself/itself, expository dialogue is annoying. I should know. I WROTE some when I was trying to write a story... whenever I try to look back at that story, I have this horrible urge to claw my eyes out. In my defense, I was about ten. XP Internal monolouge is SLIGHTLY better... then again, if internal monologues were realistically portrayed, it would start with worrying about Jean-Claude and ending up thinking about the presidental election or Hawaii. XD Unless I'm unusual, and internal monologues don't usually resemble Wikipedia-surfing binges... :P
Point being, this is just... IF SHE ALREADY _HAD_ A SCENE, SHE SHOULD HAVE STUCK WITH IT INSTEAD OF SWITCHING TO DIALOGUE! GAAAAAAAH!
no subject
Date: 2007-08-25 12:44 am (UTC)show & tell
Date: 2007-08-26 10:05 pm (UTC)Not necessarily. Dialogue can show. ("Piss off, Dolph" instead of "She was pretty mad at Dolph.") But LKH often uses dialogue as just a lazy form of exposition.
At least now we know why everyone has to spout exposition constantly: It's easier than showing you. Nevermind the pages and pages of insanely boring dialogue that ensue.
Yep. Exposition-dialogue can work, but it has to be done mindfully. There's a lot of room between
"You know I'm on leave from Gouts, right? So they're short a necromancer."
vs.
"As you know, for several years I've worked for Gouts O' Blood, where I raise the dead, execute vampires, and assist the police with paranormal investigations. However, I'm currently on extended leave to tend to my harem (which includes Ricky the werewolf, Danny the werekitty, Michael the favored werekitty, Jamie the vampire, and that delicious Ashton). As this leaves Gouts O' Blood understaffed and you're a necromancer too, I suggest you call and offer your services."
Re: show & tell
Date: 2007-08-26 11:32 pm (UTC)Re: show & tell
From:Re: show & tell
From:no subject
Date: 2007-08-29 06:46 am (UTC)If she used word counts instead of page numbers, it wouldn't bother me as much. Still, pretty much everything else about her bothers me, so it wouldn't really improve my view of her.