(no subject)
Sep. 12th, 2007 02:35 amSome really small wank involving the "boy with breasts" comment Anita made a few books ago.
Ok a bit of an info dump :
EGL is a comm for lolita fashion which has as of late picked up some attention in western anime circles. Long story short a company deciding to cash in on the growing popularity makes a booboo by sending in an uninformed, apparently grammatically challenged intern to do the dirty work for them and needless to say it Does Not Go Well.
Cue the entrance of another worker for the same company to show up and reason OP's thought process to all of us. In classic egl format (I'll admit we are a catty bunch) I rush over to her profile and pull out this little gem :
"I hate women who complain about being fat when they're like a size five. Anything under size five isn't a woman. It's a boy with breasts." -Anita Blake
And as someone else states it should be enough to make one ban the company if they hire people who put this sort of quote on their profile where anyone can see it while representing them.
Now as to how this is relevant : all of the people who have written a reply back to the comment in question are not AB fans - in fact they've never heard of LKH. Seeing people so violently reacting to it who don't come with all the knowledge that fans usually do just goes to prove that out in the Real World people are not having it when it comes to LKH's brand of crazy.
Small yes, but it amused me anyway.
I loved this remark in particular . . .
Date: 2007-09-12 11:54 am (UTC)Heh.
Re: I loved this remark in particular . . .
Date: 2007-09-12 03:18 pm (UTC)There's a freaking lolita community?
Here I was thinking that was just some kinky PRON thing. >.<
Color me oblivious.
Re: I loved this remark in particular . . .
Date: 2007-09-12 03:35 pm (UTC)Re: I loved this remark in particular . . .
Date: 2007-09-12 04:11 pm (UTC)Re: I loved this remark in particular . . .
Date: 2007-09-12 06:18 pm (UTC)Re: I loved this remark in particular . . .
Date: 2007-09-12 10:18 pm (UTC)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Classicloli.JPG
The girl on the right is a good example of what should be aimed for.
Re: I loved this remark in particular . . .
Date: 2007-09-12 10:41 pm (UTC)What caliber do you suggest? .22 she would probably just get up again.
Re: I loved this remark in particular . . .
Date: 2007-09-12 10:43 pm (UTC)Re: I loved this remark in particular . . .
Date: 2007-09-12 10:45 pm (UTC)Re: I loved this remark in particular . . .
Date: 2007-09-12 10:51 pm (UTC)And most Lolitas were totally unaware of the book until it was finally recomended as reading in one of the major loli publications a few years back. Chances are if you bring it up in Japan most will still have no idea what you're talking about. The US counterpart prides its self on being anti-child porn as well. Really the fashion and the book hold no connection to eachother and are as different as night and day.
Re: I loved this remark in particular . . .
Date: 2007-09-12 10:59 pm (UTC)I also don't care if they know about the book or not, or a group that calls itself Lolita is anti-child porn. Lolita is what pedophiles call porn with preteens. Claiming ignorance about the meaning of the word when you sell fashion to children/teens doesn't make it less offensive.
Re: I loved this remark in particular . . .
Date: 2007-09-12 11:06 pm (UTC)I understand what you're saying - child porn is up there on my top list of unforgivable offenses but that's just how the fashion came named to us. *shrug*
Re: I loved this remark in particular . . .
Date: 2007-09-12 11:07 pm (UTC)And I would never hurt a fly. I would just snark it to death ;P
Re: I loved this remark in particular . . .
Date: 2007-09-12 11:10 pm (UTC)Re: I loved this remark in particular . . .
Date: 2007-09-13 05:49 am (UTC)Or "schoolgirl Victorian"?
Re: I loved this remark in particular . . .
Date: 2007-09-13 05:52 am (UTC)Re: I loved this remark in particular . . .
Date: 2007-09-13 02:49 pm (UTC)Um...actually, that couldn't be further from the truth. A series called "Lolita Anime" was begun in Japan in 1984 (yes, it is child porn) and there's been others sense then, like the infamous Cream Lemon series. In fact you may have heard phrases like "Lolicon no hentai", which, naturally, stems from "Lolita".
In case you're wonder, I have an encyclopedia of anime dating from as far back as 1917. Haven't watched the stuff in years, but I still read the book from time to time...some of it is really fascinating. Sometimes in a really bizarre way, but still.
Re: I loved this remark in particular . . .
Date: 2007-09-13 10:34 pm (UTC)Re: I loved this remark in particular . . .
Date: 2007-09-13 10:43 pm (UTC)Re: I loved this remark in particular . . .
Date: 2007-09-13 10:54 pm (UTC)Re: I loved this remark in particular . . .
Date: 2007-09-14 03:23 pm (UTC)Re: I loved this remark in particular . . .
Date: 2007-09-16 08:10 am (UTC)Re: I loved this remark in particular . . .
Date: 2007-09-16 06:13 pm (UTC)You're confusing the word with the book and fashion and not seeing the real world way it is used by pedophiles as a code word for child pornography. These guys don't care about the book or the fashion. I don't care that the word came from a book and is now used for teen fashion.
It bothers me that people who know better (or should) still defend their choice of words when told that this is what pedophiles call their smut. I'm not the one going around posting pic's of kids and labelling it lolita. I'm just telling you that you are pointing every disgusting pedophile to all the sites that use the word lolita. But keep defending your use of it and keep telling yourself that it's ok. The pedophiles don't mind either.
Re: I loved this remark in particular . . .
Date: 2007-09-17 07:25 am (UTC)Re: I loved this remark in particular . . .
Date: 2007-09-14 03:54 pm (UTC)Au contraire - the emphasis on Gothic Lolita is about being beautiful, or elegant, or cute. (or any combination, thereof.) They tend to steer *away* from anything sexual.
Unless I am mistaken, the definition of "Lolita" in Nabokov's book is... about a sexually precocious young girl?
Re: I loved this remark in particular . . .
Date: 2007-09-15 07:39 am (UTC)So even though people like to act like "Lolita" and "nymphet" mean some oversexed schoolgirl, anyone who has read the book knows the character was only a victim of a sexual predator.
I am Goth, and that "fashion description" still irritates the crap out of me. A bit like the whole "Catherine and Heathcliff=ideal romance" psuedo-literary bit, only much more offensive.
Re: I loved this remark in particular . . .
Date: 2007-09-14 03:52 am (UTC)Re: I loved this remark in particular . . .
Date: 2007-09-14 10:01 pm (UTC)Re: I loved this remark in particular . . .
Date: 2007-09-13 03:06 am (UTC)Did someone say lolis???
no subject
Date: 2007-09-12 04:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-12 04:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-12 10:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-12 04:46 pm (UTC)That is so freaking ignorant. It still gets me pissed off.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-12 07:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-12 08:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-13 02:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-14 05:06 pm (UTC)I'm living on campus right now so I behind on what going on in EGL but DAMN I missed the EGL and LKH crossover dramu :(