I'm going to apologise for spamming up the comm, but following the saga of the contest is proving to be my soap opera of choice.
URL: http://blog.laurellkhamilton.org/2008/02/apology.html
Darla's back! I missed Darla! She's in bold! I'm abusing exclamation marks! *headdesk*
Okay, I got asked why didn’t I check the spam filter sooner? I do check the one on my end, on my machine. That one I check every day to make sure that something hasn’t gotten dumped that I don’t want dumped. Which is why I have it set to hold the emails till I dump them.
Yeah, um, great. But this doesn't actually explain anything. Not unless you had the emails sent to a whole other computer that you don't check regularly. Or something. Whut?
I got an email from one of the two people who suggested Ripley that she had done so. But I didn’t have the email. The spam filter that grabbed it was the one on the service we use. Which is where I found six emails. It grabbed six out over 12,000 that were sent. Which is one reason I hadn’t checked it.
I think what she's trying to say is that she got an email from a person asking why their submission wasn't seen, and this led to the discovery of the entries stuck in the spam filter. I should not have to sit there wondering how you can get an email but not get an email so how could she read it if it wasn't there? Unless she's getting emails from the ninjas in her office.
Not to mention, after saying that she checks the filter religiously...now she doesn't? Because the spam filter may well be full of spam? Whut?
Darla goes on to say that she has no idea why those six entries wound up in the spam filter, and speculates that there maybe something about the name "Ripley" that means that it'll be OM NOM NOMMED by the filters...but then she does something totally unexpected. She apologises.
It was my fault for not checking. I do check it. Usually once a month or so and it is rare that anything in there is something useful. Rare enough I check it occasionally, but often enough that I do have it hold them till I delete them personally. I should really have checked it after the contest ended. So totally my fault.
That's great, but what about this whole, "I check my spam filter every day!" as stated above? This is what's making me rub my temples; either you do it, or you don't. Okay, for all I know it could be like I said; two computers, one is Darla's personal and the other is her work computer. But it would be nice to have this mentioned somewhere to avoid such confusion. It'd really, really help if this post were written in oh, say, English.
The two people who suggested Ripley as well as the person who suggested Ridley will receive signed books. Which is what we originally said we would do.
HUZZAH! The original Ridley is gonna get a prize! My faith in humanity hasn't exactly been restored, but now I'm less likely to try and set small animals on fire to make myself feel better. However, this warm, fuzzy feeling is quickly lost:
And one of the two Ripley’s will be in the acknowledgements.
1) An apostrophe does not mean, "oh look! here comes an S!"
2) I'm sorry, but no. If all three are getting prizes, they might as well be in the acknowledgements too. It's two extra names, it won't kill anyone to type them. Again, I have that urge to write a politely irate emailthat will probably get eaten by the spam filters!
We still will have the usually drawing and auctions, if I can get arc’s to so with from the publisher. So for those that didn’t win, you still will have a chance to get a book before the release date.
...I have no idea what's being said here. Anyone, can you please help me translate this? All I can muster is a WHUT?! O_O
Seriously, wtf? This wasn't brain surgery, yet how in the hell could it have gotten so strange and confusing? HOW? All we're really missing is Dr Nick Riviera. (HI DR NICK!)
URL: http://blog.laurellkhamilton.org/2008/02/apology.html
Darla's back! I missed Darla! She's in bold! I'm abusing exclamation marks! *headdesk*
Okay, I got asked why didn’t I check the spam filter sooner? I do check the one on my end, on my machine. That one I check every day to make sure that something hasn’t gotten dumped that I don’t want dumped. Which is why I have it set to hold the emails till I dump them.
Yeah, um, great. But this doesn't actually explain anything. Not unless you had the emails sent to a whole other computer that you don't check regularly. Or something. Whut?
I got an email from one of the two people who suggested Ripley that she had done so. But I didn’t have the email. The spam filter that grabbed it was the one on the service we use. Which is where I found six emails. It grabbed six out over 12,000 that were sent. Which is one reason I hadn’t checked it.
I think what she's trying to say is that she got an email from a person asking why their submission wasn't seen, and this led to the discovery of the entries stuck in the spam filter. I should not have to sit there wondering how you can get an email but not get an email so how could she read it if it wasn't there? Unless she's getting emails from the ninjas in her office.
Not to mention, after saying that she checks the filter religiously...now she doesn't? Because the spam filter may well be full of spam? Whut?
Darla goes on to say that she has no idea why those six entries wound up in the spam filter, and speculates that there maybe something about the name "Ripley" that means that it'll be OM NOM NOMMED by the filters...but then she does something totally unexpected. She apologises.
It was my fault for not checking. I do check it. Usually once a month or so and it is rare that anything in there is something useful. Rare enough I check it occasionally, but often enough that I do have it hold them till I delete them personally. I should really have checked it after the contest ended. So totally my fault.
That's great, but what about this whole, "I check my spam filter every day!" as stated above? This is what's making me rub my temples; either you do it, or you don't. Okay, for all I know it could be like I said; two computers, one is Darla's personal and the other is her work computer. But it would be nice to have this mentioned somewhere to avoid such confusion. It'd really, really help if this post were written in oh, say, English.
The two people who suggested Ripley as well as the person who suggested Ridley will receive signed books. Which is what we originally said we would do.
HUZZAH! The original Ridley is gonna get a prize! My faith in humanity hasn't exactly been restored, but now I'm less likely to try and set small animals on fire to make myself feel better. However, this warm, fuzzy feeling is quickly lost:
And one of the two Ripley’s will be in the acknowledgements.
1) An apostrophe does not mean, "oh look! here comes an S!"
2) I'm sorry, but no. If all three are getting prizes, they might as well be in the acknowledgements too. It's two extra names, it won't kill anyone to type them. Again, I have that urge to write a politely irate email
We still will have the usually drawing and auctions, if I can get arc’s to so with from the publisher. So for those that didn’t win, you still will have a chance to get a book before the release date.
...I have no idea what's being said here. Anyone, can you please help me translate this? All I can muster is a WHUT?! O_O
Seriously, wtf? This wasn't brain surgery, yet how in the hell could it have gotten so strange and confusing? HOW? All we're really missing is Dr Nick Riviera. (HI DR NICK!)
no subject
Date: 2008-02-08 06:19 pm (UTC)Obviously this little contest turned out to be a lot more work than actually, say, LKH picking a name herself. Plus, doesn't it seem just a *tad* shady that of the six emails that were sent to spam, TWO of them contained the name Ripley? I don't know, it isn't impossible, but still that's a pretty huge coincidence. I have a feeling LKH was planning on simply saying that Ridley inspired her to choose Ripley all by herself.
And that last sentence went in 4 different directions, none of them resembling English.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-08 06:37 pm (UTC)I'm trying to think back to when I had the Ubar Spam Filter on Jurassic PC to deal with stuff, and it's all kinds of hinky that out of the some 12,000 that she's saying, only SIX wound up in there. The only explanation I can come up with is something to do with the email address, but that's shot down as Darla mentions that emails from those people got through A-OK. So if it's not the subject (which should have been the same for all 12,006?) and it's not the email address...
...then someone was putting things in the wrong folder? Gremlins? Office ninjas?
no subject
Date: 2008-02-08 09:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-08 06:30 pm (UTC)And you also manage to clarify something in one sentence! You help stop my brain from melting! *sends you cupcakes*
But I also dread what kind of auction/competition they'd hold to win an unedited book. e_e
no subject
Date: 2008-02-08 09:45 pm (UTC)Generally, the appeal is getting your hands on a copy of the book 3-4 months before everyone else.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-10 01:17 am (UTC)In Moore's case, however, somebody actually edited his work. In LKH's...well...we know what goes on there.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-08 06:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-08 06:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-08 07:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-08 09:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-09 08:23 am (UTC)Then there was the friend I lost track of... also says she's dyslexic. Um, okay, but that shouldn't mean she has no grasp of capitalization and little of punctuation!
For that matter, I'm learning disabled--found that out about a year ago. Most of the time, nobody can tell this from my writing, because I actually make an effort to be coherent even though my brain wiring makes that a bit more difficult than it should be!
no subject
Date: 2008-02-08 06:27 pm (UTC)Darla writes confusing gibberish. So does LKH. Both are hilarious in their own way.
Yet, they make my head want to hit my desk repeatedly.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-08 07:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-08 06:44 pm (UTC)Seriously who checks their spam folder at all, never mind every day? It's there for the crap you don't want to read!
no subject
Date: 2008-02-08 07:12 pm (UTC)I did it this morning, coincidentally--and I found a couple of emails that shouldn't have been tagged as spam. So I whitelisted the senders' email addresses before deleting everything else.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-08 07:55 pm (UTC)Still, it's all kinds of hinky that six out of 12,000 wind up in the spam filter.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-09 09:08 pm (UTC)So if they're dealing with career- and business-related stuff, they really should check their spam, especially when they SOLICIT a whole bunch of strange e-mailers. Spam on a casual or personal e-mail account I can see dumping unread.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-10 01:21 am (UTC)Off-topic, but why do I, as a female, get emails offering to enlarge my penis while some of my friends, male, get tips on how to increase their breast size?
Internet Thought of the Day.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-10 02:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-11 10:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-08 06:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-08 06:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-08 11:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-09 09:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-08 08:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-08 09:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-08 09:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-09 03:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-08 06:52 pm (UTC)I remember her when she was a fledgling mod at the old LKH boards. Still stoopid, I see.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-08 08:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-08 06:55 pm (UTC)And like sharkbytes said, what are the chances that THOSE TWO emails out of thousands would just happen to jam in the filter? Well, I'm pretty sure it's so small that it's not worth thinking about.
The fact that Darla can't write anything coherent doesn't help either.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-08 08:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-08 09:21 pm (UTC)Darla's aplogy sounds like the rambling excuses I won't accept from my nine-year old for why he doesn't clean his room. "I'm sorry I didn't, but I did, but it just didn't work. Not my fault. SPAM FILTER." Just doesn't have the same mature, humble impact as a simple: "I am so sorry I messed up this contest. It's my fault and I promise to make it up to everyone. I'm going to fix it." The apology should come from Laurell anyway.
I guess I'm being a nitpicky bitch to LKH but a woman who can't simply admit she messed up, then sends in her assistant to take the blame and apologize gets no respect from me.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-08 10:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-08 11:54 pm (UTC)I wonder if the drama continues. Well, I hope the drama continues because it amuses me. But that's a different matter altogether.
And I think they are the sort of people who give nuts a bad name.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-09 01:35 pm (UTC)I'm pretty sure your nine-year-old can come up with a better apology and solution to all this were he in charge. ^_^
no subject
Date: 2008-02-08 11:20 pm (UTC)I read that three times before I understood what you were saying, and then I couldn't stop giggling. ^_^
no subject
Date: 2008-02-09 03:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-09 12:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-09 03:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-09 01:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-11 08:37 pm (UTC)Why do I constantly underestimate the degree of stupidity in Team WhoreNita?
It would be clearer if Darla were more articulate.
Date: 2008-02-09 09:52 pm (UTC)Darla checks the spam-folder on her machine every day, and checks the spam-folder on the ISP's server once a month. Of the 12,000+ emails sent to them (for the contest?) the ISP only intercepted six. This very low intercept rate is why she doesn't check the ISP's folder more often.
Re: It would be clearer if Darla were more articulate.
Date: 2008-02-10 05:36 pm (UTC)However, I have a computer science degree and could translate her garbled tech-speak. I imagine that for many, it is just garbled. I bet the contest "winners" are still confused and this didn't help any.
Anyone want to take bets on when Jon, the "tech guy," will make a post trying to further explain the spam filter issue?
Re: It would be clearer if Darla were more articulate.
Date: 2008-02-16 06:57 am (UTC)But yes, one spam filter on your own computer, one on your ISP's server.