![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
The last book I read was Incubus Dreams, and that was more than three years ago. Even it was more fun than Danse Macabre, which I just journalled on BookCrossing when I got the book as part of a bookring (better than giving royalties to LKH)... this is my review:
Ah, the ardeur. It was trouble when it first appeared, but for a couple of books it managed to sit uneasily alongside the plot. Ah, the plot. That hasn't been seen in a while; not since before Incubus Dreams, the last Anita Blake book I read, and the first one to disappoint in a major way.
But this... for the first quarter of the book I actually thought about putting it down, which is most unlike me. I kept asking myself whether the grandstanding between vampire dignitaries had always been this elongated (I think the whole introduction to the visitors takes up two chapters, yet would be maybe ten minutes of realtime action at MOST), and whether there'd always been so many boring descriptions of hair and eyes.
Then there's the author's apparent belief that we need to have her stock phrases repeated all the time, because we can't remember the contexts of the characters' little habits. If I ever see the phrase "Gallic shrug that meant everything and nothing" again, I'm afraid that I'll be forced to stake Jean-Claude if only to stop him from shrugging, so that Anita will stop describing it.
And staking Jean-Claude would be a pity, because he's one of the two characters who actually manage to develop here, in that he finally gives Anita grief about how he has feelings too. The other character who advances a little in my estimation is Richard, because at least he's trying in the good sense of the word, for a change. As for what happens with Asher, I'm not sure I'd call that development on his part...
What it boils down to is that there's no longer any danger. At no point did I think, "Oh crumbs, how's she going to get out of this one?" It was just one "metaphysical emergency" after another, where sex was, to borrow from Homer Simpson's opinion on beer, both the cause of and solution to all of life's problems. I miss the days when the preternatural politics had a point: that Anita was going to use either her gun or her mouth (not like that) to get out of a room alive, and always had to balance her natural flippancy with the ancient immutable laws of vampire interaction.
I picked up a few of the Guilty Pleasures comics the other day, and while the art is far from perfect, it was nice to be reminded that these used to be adventure stories with ambiguity and a tough-as-nails heroine. I remain very puzzled about what Laurell K. Hamilton thinks she's doing...
Ah, the ardeur. It was trouble when it first appeared, but for a couple of books it managed to sit uneasily alongside the plot. Ah, the plot. That hasn't been seen in a while; not since before Incubus Dreams, the last Anita Blake book I read, and the first one to disappoint in a major way.
But this... for the first quarter of the book I actually thought about putting it down, which is most unlike me. I kept asking myself whether the grandstanding between vampire dignitaries had always been this elongated (I think the whole introduction to the visitors takes up two chapters, yet would be maybe ten minutes of realtime action at MOST), and whether there'd always been so many boring descriptions of hair and eyes.
Then there's the author's apparent belief that we need to have her stock phrases repeated all the time, because we can't remember the contexts of the characters' little habits. If I ever see the phrase "Gallic shrug that meant everything and nothing" again, I'm afraid that I'll be forced to stake Jean-Claude if only to stop him from shrugging, so that Anita will stop describing it.
And staking Jean-Claude would be a pity, because he's one of the two characters who actually manage to develop here, in that he finally gives Anita grief about how he has feelings too. The other character who advances a little in my estimation is Richard, because at least he's trying in the good sense of the word, for a change. As for what happens with Asher, I'm not sure I'd call that development on his part...
What it boils down to is that there's no longer any danger. At no point did I think, "Oh crumbs, how's she going to get out of this one?" It was just one "metaphysical emergency" after another, where sex was, to borrow from Homer Simpson's opinion on beer, both the cause of and solution to all of life's problems. I miss the days when the preternatural politics had a point: that Anita was going to use either her gun or her mouth (not like that) to get out of a room alive, and always had to balance her natural flippancy with the ancient immutable laws of vampire interaction.
I picked up a few of the Guilty Pleasures comics the other day, and while the art is far from perfect, it was nice to be reminded that these used to be adventure stories with ambiguity and a tough-as-nails heroine. I remain very puzzled about what Laurell K. Hamilton thinks she's doing...
no subject
Date: 2008-05-22 11:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-22 08:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-23 12:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-23 10:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-23 05:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-21 08:00 pm (UTC)And omigods, Anita's sex really is the cause of and solution to all of life's problems in those books. Thank you, Homer Simpson, we now have an analogy that works!
no subject
Date: 2008-05-21 08:03 pm (UTC)http://french.about.com/library/weekly/aa020901g.htm
That's what Jean-Claude does that Anita keeps reminding us of?
no subject
Date: 2008-05-21 08:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-21 08:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-21 08:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-21 08:26 pm (UTC)(http://hicsuntdracones.files.wordpress.com/2007/06/wwwtelegraphcouk_french-rude-gesture_the-gallic-shrug.jpg)
no subject
Date: 2008-05-21 09:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-21 11:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-23 11:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-21 08:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-21 08:35 pm (UTC)http://thejeffreytaylor.blip.tv/file/494395/
(video, so you can see it in action).
no subject
Date: 2008-05-21 08:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-21 08:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-22 06:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-22 01:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-21 09:05 pm (UTC)How hard would it have been for LKH to write "Jean Claude shrugged, raising his hands in the air in a gesture of dispassionate neutrality (insert any other word for 'I don't give a flying fuck')"
Instead we get the 'Gallic shrug' that leaves readers wondering what the fuck LKH means. For some reason, everytime I see that phrase I think of 'Gaelic'...a 'Gaelic shrug', as opposed to the 'French shrug' or the 'American shrug' ::does an American shrug that means 'fuck off, I don't give a damn'::
One phrase that bothered me the most was Anita's overuse of the 'who me?'. Scared, who me? Angry, who me? A whore, who me?
no subject
Date: 2008-05-21 09:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-22 06:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-22 11:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-21 10:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-21 11:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-22 06:08 am (UTC)That phrase shows up more than once?!
no subject
Date: 2008-05-22 12:06 pm (UTC)and yes, that phrase shows up a lot. I think she has a quota of at least once a book now.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-22 01:28 pm (UTC)1) Make her look smarter than us, cuz neener-neener! she knows a phrase we, her unsophisticated readers don't.
2) Makes JC look/sound sexier because it's not just a shrug, it's a Gallic shrug. And if it's French, it's sexy!
Now having seen both pictures supplied by the lovely and talented
no subject
Date: 2008-05-23 11:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-23 01:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-21 09:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-21 10:22 pm (UTC)I must use it!
For JC, he is teh suave, teh sexy, teh FRENCH!
/i dunno either.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-22 07:29 am (UTC)"Bon! Now it is time for the chicken dance, mon ami! Ma petit is so easily impressed by a few slithers and sways that I cannot help but string her along!"
no subject
Date: 2008-05-22 07:50 am (UTC)Damn it! You made me spit milk on my computer. There are specks all over the screen now... D:
no subject
Date: 2008-05-22 05:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-21 08:19 pm (UTC)I'd call it development for the first few paragraphs, where he's talking about how he's desperate to be somebody's one'n'only (implication: not you, Ms. Harem-owner). Then Anita plies him with her crotch, and emotional booboos are magically all better!
no subject
Date: 2008-05-22 11:34 am (UTC)And Asher... when the three of them thrashed out how Jean-Claude wasn't doing him because Anita would bitch, I foolishly thought there was hope; the way that scene closed gave me the impression that she was in effect giving them permission to be physical with each other. But later on something about their behaviour or dialogue gave me the impression that no such implied agreement had taken place. If anything, after what happened with Asher biting Anita, it seems like there's even more reason for Jean-Claude to give Asher some private time... :S
Also - do the police come back in the next couple of books? I really missed them...
no subject
Date: 2008-05-22 01:05 pm (UTC)What's worse is that she continues to string readers along, then backtracks. At the end of TH there was a throwaway line which acknowledged that JC and Asher were finally together, but I knew Laurita's ego wouldn't be able to handle it. In BN they're frustrated, unrequited, born-again ass-virgins, AGAIN!
no subject
Date: 2008-05-22 02:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-22 07:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-22 06:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-22 11:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-22 05:50 pm (UTC)And if I have to read one more kitty cat eyes, ankle length auburn braid and/or vanilla scented skin, I'm going on a rampage with napalm and a flamethrower.
Ultimately - the real bottom line is how sad, frustrated and deeply disappointed I am over what the books could have been.
This parallel world LKH envisioned could have been brilliant, the vampire/were/human politics could have been fascinating, the animator/necromancer training, work and moral quandaries mind boggling, the magic, crime and secret governmental interest enthralling.
The opportunities that go begging for true character development drive me nuts!
It's that the books are badly written, smutty trash - AND THEY JUST DON'T HAVE TO BE!! {/end rant}
no subject
Date: 2008-05-22 06:37 pm (UTC)What makes me sad is that I don't feel she's interested in exploring that stuff any more. If she really wanted to, she could write herself out of the corner that is the ardeur - it's been made clear in this book alone that finding strong enough "food" is a good way to control it. Let Anita have sex a bunch of times a day, but let the references to the sex that's about practicality and not about psychological interactions be perfunctorily referenced - just like how she can write about drinking coffee or taking a shower without going into major detail. And let us get our paranormal cops'n'robbers stuff back!
no subject
Date: 2014-05-12 08:38 pm (UTC)