Cerulean Sins review
Jul. 2nd, 2008 10:16 pm![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
At Reading By Moonslight, a brand-spanking-new pisstake-romance-novel-review blog, takes on Cerulean Sins:
Belle: I’ll explain later, Claire.
Niki, you naturally fail to recognise the Genius of this decision. Less page space dedicated to a more organic solution of problems raised earlier in the book means more page space dedicated to superbly realised vampire threesomes.
Short, sweet, hilarious, dialogue-format, can't wait for Darla to find it and think they're being serious.
Belle: I’ll explain later, Claire.
Niki, you naturally fail to recognise the Genius of this decision. Less page space dedicated to a more organic solution of problems raised earlier in the book means more page space dedicated to superbly realised vampire threesomes.
Short, sweet, hilarious, dialogue-format, can't wait for Darla to find it and think they're being serious.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-02 10:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-02 11:37 am (UTC)Do you think Laurell or Darla or Jon will make a post, redirecting her fans to the site and gushing about the wonderful review??? That would be... just too much. *snort*
no subject
Date: 2008-07-02 03:23 pm (UTC)And the...but...oh lord, I can't even figure out where to begin with this! Except that I remember the author's note in CS stating that Jon chose the title, and it always sounded to me like random purple gibberish that was supposed to sound evocative and sensual but really meant absolutely jack shit.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-03 10:31 am (UTC)and mafia-like. Owning a lingerie shop would be kind of... gay (we wouldn't want people suspecting that Jean-Claude was anything other than 100% heterossexual, Asher aside). See, you have to think like Laurita, if you want to make sense of all the ridiculous in her books. :pno subject
Date: 2008-07-03 01:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-04 09:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-06 04:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-06 05:11 pm (UTC)Further proof that Earth logic and LKH don't mesh.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-03 10:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-02 05:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-02 06:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-02 09:26 pm (UTC)Did this commenter and I read the same book, or did I just completely miss something?
no subject
Date: 2008-07-02 11:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-03 02:48 am (UTC)If you need me, I'll be riding the Failboat. -_-