Things I'd Like to See More Of
Jul. 31st, 2008 10:02 amI was thinking about the Urban Fantasy/Paranormal Romance genre yesterday, and I realized that almost every single series likes to rehash the same tropes over and over again, as if these are the only possible ways to write. And since these are the only things that get written about, there are a large number of ideas that never get to see the light of day. That said, here are the things I'd like to see/like to see more of, and I was wondering if anyone else has their own opinions of what they'd like to see in the genre more.
1. Master vampires who don't base their boundaries off of human divisions. For example, in Anita Blake, all of the master vampires are masters of cities. Why end at the city? Who controls the surrounding suburbs? What about small towns in the middle of nowhere? Do they answer to the master of the nearest big city, or do they have their own form of government. Also, in other series that I've read, the master vampires are the masters of a clear cut area, like a state or a country. Why? The boundaries that we know of today haven't always been like that? The vampire, if it's old enough, would probably be more used to the way lands were divided before the humans drew the official lines. (This may just be me though, wishing that there was a master vampire of the Louisiana Purchase who refuses to take into account that the states have been divided up since then.)
2. A heroine who despite the charms and advances of the sexy manipulative local master vampire continues to be a committed relationship... with her fellow female coworker.
3. If there shall be an OT3/threesome within the series, I wish at least one other member of the party is of the same gender as the protagonist. It'd make the "I love this guy, but I also love this guy, so whatever shall I do? I know! Threesome!" a lot more bearable and not so... contrived.
4. An overweight protagonist.
5. An extremely old protagonist who is the best there is because of their age and experience. Not because of sheer dumb luck.
6. A vampire couple or vampire/human couple who gets around the whole can never-have-child angst thing by adoption.
7. Double points if they raise said human child to become a lawyer/judge/senator so that they can help pass laws that will benefit the vampire race.
8. Triple points if said human lawyer/judge/senator is not a main character/does not angst about their mixed past whatsoever.
9. A heroine who falls in love with the manipulative master vampire because he is manipulative, and does not try to change him in any shape or form because that's what makes him attractive to her.
10. Double points if said master vampire does not fall in love with her in return, but knows that she is useful and proceeds to use her without feeling any remorse or guilt.
11. Quadruple points if both said heroine and master vampire understand their relationship with each other and are both TOTALLY FINE with it.
... I think that's it for now.
1. Master vampires who don't base their boundaries off of human divisions. For example, in Anita Blake, all of the master vampires are masters of cities. Why end at the city? Who controls the surrounding suburbs? What about small towns in the middle of nowhere? Do they answer to the master of the nearest big city, or do they have their own form of government. Also, in other series that I've read, the master vampires are the masters of a clear cut area, like a state or a country. Why? The boundaries that we know of today haven't always been like that? The vampire, if it's old enough, would probably be more used to the way lands were divided before the humans drew the official lines. (This may just be me though, wishing that there was a master vampire of the Louisiana Purchase who refuses to take into account that the states have been divided up since then.)
2. A heroine who despite the charms and advances of the sexy manipulative local master vampire continues to be a committed relationship... with her fellow female coworker.
3. If there shall be an OT3/threesome within the series, I wish at least one other member of the party is of the same gender as the protagonist. It'd make the "I love this guy, but I also love this guy, so whatever shall I do? I know! Threesome!" a lot more bearable and not so... contrived.
4. An overweight protagonist.
5. An extremely old protagonist who is the best there is because of their age and experience. Not because of sheer dumb luck.
6. A vampire couple or vampire/human couple who gets around the whole can never-have-child angst thing by adoption.
7. Double points if they raise said human child to become a lawyer/judge/senator so that they can help pass laws that will benefit the vampire race.
8. Triple points if said human lawyer/judge/senator is not a main character/does not angst about their mixed past whatsoever.
9. A heroine who falls in love with the manipulative master vampire because he is manipulative, and does not try to change him in any shape or form because that's what makes him attractive to her.
10. Double points if said master vampire does not fall in love with her in return, but knows that she is useful and proceeds to use her without feeling any remorse or guilt.
11. Quadruple points if both said heroine and master vampire understand their relationship with each other and are both TOTALLY FINE with it.
... I think that's it for now.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-31 08:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-31 09:11 pm (UTC)And as for the last three points, they were written in contempt with the whole "heal with the power of love" thing that I've been seeing a lot of recently.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-07-31 09:00 pm (UTC)And I wished there was just ONE series like this for gay men. Michael Thomas Ford should write one.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 12:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 01:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 06:18 am (UTC)I can think of a couple more fantasy novels with gay characters, but I'm not as entrenched in urban fantasy.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 02:58 pm (UTC)Remind me to tell you when I get home. ;-)
no subject
Date: 2008-07-31 09:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 12:31 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-07-31 09:09 pm (UTC)2. Ditto for Harry Dresden.
3. Urban fantasy without vampires or werewolves. There are so many cool mythical creatures out there that are unexplored. Like djinns, kitsunes or tengu just off the top of my head.
4. A cool heroine/hero outside the first two examples I already mentioned.
5. A heroine who's actually feminine. Whining is not being feminine, M. Liu and Lilith Saintcrow.
6. Real vampires. Bring back Dracula, for f#$@ sake.
I'm actually so over urban fantasy except for you know, Marla Manson and Harry Dresden.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-02 10:32 pm (UTC)Yes, would also love to see some cool mythical creatures from other cultures. There have got to be some great mythical creatures from Asia or Africa, for example!
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-07-31 09:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 02:41 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-07-31 09:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-31 09:35 pm (UTC)I would like to see more love for the genre instead of just love for the idea of having hot sex with a vampire/werewolf.
I would like to see more about how a society were supernatural element exists would work.
I would like to see people react sanely on the supernatural elements. Considering for example how AB vampires operate I think Humans First has a very good point.
Nitpicks.
Date: 2008-07-31 10:08 pm (UTC)#7 kinda skeeves me out, anyone who raises a child to be a tool for their agenda better not be a good guy.
As for #4, I'd rather have a protagonist who simply doesn't go on about their weight like a 14-year-old girl, and thus the audience never even needs to know.
It's good points in total though, and I like #5 and #11 terribly much. (I think #10 is already happening in the series, but somehow even the author doesn't get it.)
Re: Nitpicks.
Date: 2008-07-31 10:27 pm (UTC)Well... I didn't say they had to be good. I didn't even say the child had to be good. I was just thinking that if I was a less-than-noble vampire, somehow adopted a kid, had all of this money at my disposal, and was under/misrepresented in the legal system... what would I try to push my kid into?
Re: Nitpicks.
From:Re: Nitpicks.
From:no subject
Date: 2008-07-31 10:34 pm (UTC)2. Specific to vampires: vampires that don't angst so much about losing their humanity. They're legitimately not human anymore, but that doesn't mean they can't ever have any fun.
3. Actually, the part about non-humans never having any fun isn't really specific to vampires. I'd love to see more fun-loving partiers who weren't portrayed as jerks and who weren't the villains.
As far as your list goes, I would love to see 1-8, and maybe 9 if used in conjunction with 11. Not so sure about 10, though.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-31 10:54 pm (UTC)Like I've told other people, I like fantasy with a dash of romance, not romance with a dash of fantasy. So many books nowadays seem to fall into the latter category.
As far as your list goes, I would love to see 1-8, and maybe 9 if used in conjunction with 11. Not so sure about 10, though.
And yeah, as far as 9 through 11 go, I put them in there because I am sick and fed up with the sensitive!vampire shit Anne Rice/other people like Anne Rice started. Nowadays they either start out spineless, or become spineless throughout the course of the series, usually as a direct side-effect from being exposed to the protagonist too much. Sometimes I want to summon Bram Stoker's spirit back from the dead so he claim his revenge on the vampire publishing market today.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-07-31 10:36 pm (UTC)Yea, it'd take some seriously good planning to pull that one off as a series but even just as a quick parody that'd just make my day. :P
no subject
Date: 2008-07-31 10:48 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-07-31 11:07 pm (UTC)I knew I forgot something. Seriously, this is the reason I've never been able to understand vegetarian vampires. Medical blood. It exists for a reason.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 12:21 am (UTC)This was indirectly addressed in AB's world in Bloody Bones. JC specifically states that Branson's population had grown enough to support its own vampire population and that he agreed to losing this part of his territory to Seraphina. Taking a big leap and assuming some sort of consistency in AB (I know, that's not wise). It seems that vampire MoCs have a territory kinda like archdioceses (sp?) in the Catholic chuch. For instance the archdiocese of St. Louis includes a much larger geographic area than just St. Louis.
Going from the evidence in Bloody Bones, I would think that the MoC controls a large geographic territory around the city itself, and that this can change based on (living) human population demographics.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 12:24 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 02:36 am (UTC)1. LKH actually got this one right. Sorta (see part b). If supernatural creatures actually existed, it would significantly affect society. For them to go unnoticed in today's high-tech world with its ever-expanding population, the numbers of para-creatures would have to be quite small. All those stories where these large populations of magical creatures are somehow able to evade discovery by mundane society (Adams & Clamp, and Butcher's Harry Dresden series, for 2 random examples) make me scoff. Of the authors I've read, only LKH and Kim Harrison have gotten this right. But...
1b. Neither have really managed to explore how this has affected the history of their universe. Harrison's is somewhat forgiveable since her series is pretty action-packed and she's only on book 7(?), but Hamilton's got like, 19(?) freaking books in this series.
2. It's hokey, but I'd like to see a vegetarian carnivore-shifter.
3. I'd also like to see weres who shift into big cats, and actually behave like big cats.
4. I really want a wider variety of personality types for both male and female characters, but especially for females. I've bitched on this comm before about the proliferance (this may not be a real word, but I like it better than profusion) of Snappy Sues. Others have bitched about the abundance of pretty boy vamps in the genre. There's so many different ways for people to be that there's really no excuse for these cookie-cutter personalities in the genre.
5. In the same vein (heh heh),I'd like to see more introverted heroines. Yes, you can be shy and quiet without being weak or neurotic. Where the hell are the strong silent women?
6. I'd like to see more pack politics. So far, the stories I've read seem to only explore the alpha/dominance fight part of pack politics. Anyone who's ever worked in any sort of organizational hierarchy knows that there's much more to the internecine than biting other people's throats.
7. Post-HEA relationships. I'd like to read about a hero/heroine in a committed, steady relationship with a partner who isn't an asshole. Not necessary, but bonus points if the pair works together, fighting side by side and all that good crap. I don't wanna see lovey-dovey honey raindrops sunshine happiness all the time in said relationship. Conflict is cool, but I want to see them resolve their problems like, ya know, adults.
So yeah. That's what I'd like.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 02:47 am (UTC)I agree on this. I can kind of recall that in Harrison, Tomatoes Are BAD and the black market pizzerias... but there is a lot more that can be developed.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 05:18 am (UTC)Vampires and weres who are NOT obsessed with getting more power and influence and crap like that. How about a vampire who is powerful, but happy to just hang out in his mansion and play pranks on the neighborhood kids?
A vampire who was turned into said vampire later in life than his early twenties. How about fifties? A nice paternal-looking bloodsucker.
Reasonably endowed males.
Female characters who actually acknowledge that you cannot change a bad boy, and that only he can change himself... and she actually sticks by it.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 03:16 pm (UTC)The only problem with your second point is that in most cases, those with power tend to become targets of those seeking power. Granted, I could see a 500 year old vampire who is happy with what he's got - and doesn't actively seek out more power simply for the sake of having it - but what about the hot young turks who come barging around his territories trying to stir up shit? Power corrupts, but it also attracts the corruptible.
And what happens when another, equally powerful (or even more powerful) opponent comes along? It might be an unavoidable consequence to have to gain more power just in the act of trying to maintain the status quo.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 10:01 am (UTC)6. A vampire couple or vampire/human couple who gets around the whole can never-have-child angst thing by adoption.
My MC's brother was recently turned into a vampire and his girlfriend sort of spilled her guts out to my MC. One of the things MC suggested was that she act as the female requirement required for MC and vampire's brother and boyfriend to have a kid.
She suggested the men get the kid during the day, and girlfriend and vampire get it during the night. And since the dads are a cop, a doctor and a vampire, it's like the "when I grow up I wanna be..." trifecta!
icon musings
Date: 2008-08-01 02:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 09:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 10:52 pm (UTC)-Threeway relationship that acted like REAL poly-relationships. Dealing this the jealousy, having the hero actually make some sacrifices, etc.)
-A law that all urban fantasy writers must undergo a psyche evaluation before being allowed to be published, thus preventing headcases using their writing as a way to get back at everyone who "screwed them over" or use it to probe how cool of a person they are.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-02 10:49 pm (UTC)Certainly being hundreds of years old would not make one seek constant orgies like in Hamilton's books. Certainly even orgies (and sex in general) would grow old over the centuries - particularly as there would be literally no biological need for sex, as vampire reproduction takes place in another way.
What would you do if you were hundreds of years old to keep off boredom? How would you keep sane? How would you keep up with the fast changing modern society and tech without outing yourself?
And how would you deal with your REAL need and drive to reproduce vampire offspring by blood exchange? Would that drive be as strong as a human sex drive? Why or why not?
How would relationships between vampire "parents" and "children" work out - with now two major predators eventually competing in the same area for the same prey?
Vampires could be really interesting and cool if treated like the separate predator species they should be, rather than the way overused emo pretty boy sex it up with humans even though they are another species shit.
Humans do not sex it up with OUR protein sources - we do not have sex with cattle or chickens or lambs or hogs. Why would vampires become romatically or sexually interested in humans? It would be like bestiality for them...
no subject
Date: 2008-08-05 11:44 am (UTC)