While regularly assaulted by LKH's abuse of the retweet recently, it made me remember something I meant to ask the lashout crew awhile ago.
What is LKH's standpoint on fan fiction. I remember her tweet about how she'll be forced to take legal action if people provide her with links or discuss their fan fiction in the Meritaverse with her. Is this a common thing authors do? Or is LKH just stiflifing my muse?
(also, I have no idea what to tag this as!)
What is LKH's standpoint on fan fiction. I remember her tweet about how she'll be forced to take legal action if people provide her with links or discuss their fan fiction in the Meritaverse with her. Is this a common thing authors do? Or is LKH just stiflifing my muse?
(also, I have no idea what to tag this as!)
no subject
Date: 2009-10-28 12:14 am (UTC)It's very uncommon for authors, actually. Most of them ignore it, even when someone brings it up. There's a bit of a legal problem for THEM, because of fear that someone will say an author/writer/whatever read their work and then used it without giving them credit. And whether or not an author can actually win a lawsuit against a fanfic writer is still up in the air, too, as there are plenty of legal arguments for and against it in various countries.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-28 12:15 am (UTC)As for other authors, it varies widely. Yasmine Galenorn is VERY adamant about no fanfiction with her characters, but others, like Melissa Marr, are okay with it as long as it doesn't get sent to them. The reason for that is so they don't get sued for "theft" if they write a story with a plot similar to a fic they were sent.
The legal waters are very muddy when it comes to ff, so I don't know what, if anything, an author can do about it other than send a cease and desist notice.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-28 03:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-28 12:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-28 12:20 am (UTC)Which, I think, is why a lot of authors, creators and so on are okay with fanfic and the like, as long as they can pretend ignorance. Their studios and publishers might not be so forgiving--after all, the creative work is how the corps make their money--but I haven't seen a lot of instances of them going after the fan authors.
OTOH, you have people like George Lucas who encourage fan works, as long as no profit is made and the franchise's image is not tarnished (Han turning into a genocidal maniac, Han/Luke gay porn films, etc.)
no subject
Date: 2009-10-28 12:20 am (UTC)P.N. Elrod
Raymond Feist
Terry Goodkind
Laurell K. Hamilton
Robin Hobb
Megan Lindholm (Robin Hobb)
Dennis L. McKiernan
Robin McKinley
Irene Radford
Anne Rice:Anne Rampling:A.N. Roquelaure
Nora Roberts/J.D. Robb
re: fan fic
Date: 2009-10-28 01:06 am (UTC)There's a lot of writing that goes on out on the web, and most of the authors really don't LIKE fan fic. Most of them, as has been previously said, ignore it as long as nobody that writes it is trying to profit by it. Some of them - like Sherrilyn Kenyon - actively encourage folks to write it and send it to her. She's compling an anthology of fan fiction, or so she's said in the past.
That said, I wonder what lkh is going to do about that "unauthorized" book that's being flogged on Amazon. There's also a thread on one of the Amazon forums containing some REALLY well-written and presented alternative endings to the WhoreNita series. Given h's penchant for suing people, I wonder what she'd do if she knew about *THAT*.
-,'-,'-,'--@
Re: Off Topic
Date: 2009-10-29 11:37 am (UTC)Are there any other writers that are very Kenyon like that should be avoided? Because there is quite a lot of paranormal/ urban fanatsy books these days and so little time and money :(
no subject
Date: 2009-10-28 02:14 am (UTC)IMHO LKH is afraid that fan-fic authors will do a better job writing in her world than she does. I know that Eric Flint has encouraged fan-fic as well as other professional writers to write stories for his 1632 universe.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-28 04:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-29 03:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-28 02:06 pm (UTC)Writing for canon characters and keeping them in character is the hard part. Many get it wrong because only the author realy knows how the characters would react in any given situation.
It's interesting to note that the most common accusations against bad fanfiction stories are based on them being OOC (out of character) or featuring a Mary Sue. Essentially characters not being the way the book author would have written them.
Myself I always found it more interesting to read fanfics that flesh out the minor characters of the canon world because they give more leeway for the fan writer's own ideas and are less restrictive. And crossovers, I love crossovers, because the 'playground' is not just from one book/series/film but is a mix of two or more (though the more the worse it gets) so gives the fan writer some space to be creative about the worldbuilding too.
But no matter how hard you worked on your fanfic, how well it's written and how many people liked it more than the original, you can't really claim it as entirely your own creation - you were basing it on someone else's work. You can't publish it either.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-28 09:42 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-10-28 04:54 am (UTC)A pre-made anything doesn't make writing easier. It just gives a jumping off point. :P
no subject
Date: 2009-10-28 05:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-28 05:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-28 05:27 am (UTC)You might want to check out Henry Jenkins ... he's one of the academics who is exploring the possibility that fan fiction is not as derivative as everyone says it is, and has very interesting things to say about why you want to discuss fan fiction with your students. He has an interesting blog that gets into some of the pedagogical issues here (even though it's talking about the legality ones as well):
http://www.henryjenkins.org/2006/09/fan_fiction_as_critical_commen.html
(and most of his books are available through google books and you can check out some of his work on Harry Potter fan fiction that will definitely complicate the 'fanfic is easier to write' perspective)
no subject
Date: 2009-10-28 05:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-28 06:37 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-10-28 01:53 am (UTC)And someone besides Anita/Merry will be getting laid. *nods*
no subject
Date: 2009-10-28 02:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-28 02:22 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-10-28 03:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-28 02:40 am (UTC)Jim Butcher...when asked...did the whole "Why of course my fans would know that I can't endorse fan fiction and of course if any DID write some they wouldn't show it to me and force me to take any action....right?" *winkwink* Translation he knows its out there...but as long as it's kept quiet and profit free he's cool.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-28 04:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-28 09:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-28 04:56 pm (UTC)But she used to be a fanfic writer herself afaik, so it would be somewhat hypocritical for her to be anti-fanfic now.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-28 09:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-28 03:21 am (UTC)That being said, I'm amused that LKH/Ma Petite Enterprises hasn't threatened adultfanfiction.net with legal action. There's a whole Anita Blake section there. Maybe they like it because it's still porny? Though granted, the fics I see there are still generally better-written than the books. Makes one wonder.
RE: Kenyon's purple prose
Date: 2009-10-28 03:52 am (UTC)I didn't much care for ACHERON either - and I actively did NOT like ONE SILENT NIGHT, which takes place BEFORE ACHERON, and was published afterwards.
Most of what Mrs. Kenyon writes is formula fiction, which follows the same pattern and basically uses the same characters with different names, sometimes in different locations. Most of the time, I like her stuff. The latest stuff (last 4 books), not so much. Remember, she wanted to DO manga and anime to begin with. Maybe that's why it's sounding more and more LIKE written anime.
lkh's nonsense USED to be good for a laugh. Now? want a REALLY good laugh? go to the Amazon group NEW AND IMPORVED TWEET FLOG. Better yet, read lkh's stupid, pointless and completely RIDCULOUS tweets. Isn't it NICE that she's got something better to do than edit (HAH!) her newest trainwreck? Even got the newest PA to read and correct her plog. Too bad that CTNKKK can't produce better spelling and grammer.
-,'-,'-,'--@
Re: Kenyon's purple prose
Date: 2009-10-29 04:01 am (UTC)But on another note, do you think LKH's writing would have at least stopped degrading if it had become formulaic after Narcissus in chains? Or would it have just made us loose the lulz from wondering what ridiculous thing she would come up with next if it still degraded?
Re: Kenyon's purple prose
Date: 2009-10-30 08:51 pm (UTC)Got to wonder about it, yes. ANY outline book is going to be basically the same: pretty girl in peril, hunky hero to the rescue, problems to be resolved, sex/sex, erotic thoughts, more problems to be resolved, problem resolution with enough left to power the next novel. Mrs. Kenyon writes from an outline, true - and, after all she's gone through in her life, I don't blame her for writing what she knows will sell. The most amazing thing about her is that she has four series going and still manages to have a life beyond it. She's also killed off popular characters to further the storylines - which lkh will never, EVER do.
NOTHING that anybody could have done after OB would have made the devolution of lkh's writing any less inevitable. That's when she changed her
entire life to be able to dictate to other people what she would and would NOT do. What's different now about her life? An adoring trophy husband who is not longer as young as she likes, an adoring pair of lesbians in Darla's place, and worse and worse writing because she has NO brakes or oversight on what she says - nobody says "no" to her at all for any reason. Basically, whether or not she wants to admit it, she is NOT writing for the fans or writing to please herself any longer. She's writing for the money. I think that's the biggest problem that she's having - she doesn't want to write to the publisher's dictate but in order for her to keep her comfortable lifestyle and support her circle of sycophants, toadeaters and lickspittles, she's writing what she knows will sell. That's why she had such a hard time with the MSB book this time around.
Of course, ANY writer that is writing is writing to make money. That's a given, just ask Stephen King - he's on record as yes he wants to entertain BUT he also writes to make a living - and he writes what people want to read so that he CAN write what he wants even if it's not a critical or monetary success.
The ABVH and MG series are going to continue to devolve, and, eventually, lkh will not have an audience at all. One wonders what she will do then.
-,'-,'-,'--@
no subject
Date: 2009-10-28 04:37 am (UTC)Most authors I think realize that they can't stop people from writing fan fiction and posting it on the web somewhere. Furthermore, I would hope that the intelligent authors out there realize that making a big fuss over fan fiction will only spread it faster. So it's safer to ignore and avoid as long as no money is involved.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-28 09:28 am (UTC)Think of star trek, that's a very profit-way to use fanfic, no ? Because I'm pretty sure star trek and star wars, are both fanfic, in the end.
And face it right too, if your characters is good enough to be fanficted, if your world is good enough, or bad... it's still a compliment of your own imagination.
If you want to think deeper into it, you can consider too that a Good Idea is Always Fanfictionned. Whatever the subject (and books are not the only think that get fanfictionned, if you look hard enough) a good work is always a good work.
If LKH was secure with her characters, she should'nt have problems with fanfic.
Because, when the original work is perfectly made, it's ultimatly this work that rest in the mind of the reader.
VoilÃ
no subject
Date: 2009-10-28 05:00 am (UTC)Louis McMaster Bujold wrote fic before she wrote original stuff but that was decades ago now.
Kelly Armstrong doesn't mind it and lets (or at least she did as of ~three years ago) people post it to a designated area on her message board so long as it's got the disclaimer of all characters/etc. belong to Kelly Armstrong on it.
I think the main problem authors have with fic stems from the lawsuits that were brought against Marion Zimmer Bardley in the late 80s/early 90s (I think I've got the period right).
no subject
Date: 2009-10-28 05:00 am (UTC)Long story short: Fic is okay, JUST DO NOT ASK THEM TO HOST/READ IT. It would ruin the sandbox for everyone else.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-28 08:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-25 08:29 pm (UTC)How I understand it.
Date: 2009-10-28 09:47 am (UTC)But I'm guessing it's a show so they can claim they always defend their copyright while claiming they don't read it protects them the whole stealing thing.
Edited to say: I live in the US and I have no idea if copyright law is different in other countries.
Re: How I understand it.
Date: 2009-10-28 11:54 am (UTC)Re: How I understand it.
Date: 2009-10-28 05:12 pm (UTC)If I send $AUTHOR a copy of my fanfic, or just suggest a plot, and then $AUTHOR uses that idea/plot/whatever in an upcoming novel, I could sue $AUTHOR for stealing my idea.
Happened to MZB. Almost happened between SM Stirling and John Ringo a few years back when both submitted novels with strikingly similar premises.
Eric Flint's 1632verse stuff is a unique case where he voluntarily opened his universe to collaboration both by amateurs and professional writers (though at this point only the avid amateur fan community know the plot well enough to contribute meaningfully). But while the contributing authors have ownership of their particular stories, FLINT still has ultimate ownership of the universe. He decides to close it, everyone has to pack up and go home.
Re: How I understand it.
Date: 2009-10-29 03:50 am (UTC)Yay! I learned.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-28 10:17 am (UTC)please, say what you think of the rest of the novella. I' want to have a good review.. or a bad one, it's up to you all.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-28 10:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-28 03:18 pm (UTC)PN Elrod, who also blogs on LJ and is very helpful to young writers, has admitted to doing fan fiction in her dark past. She considered it useful for practicing techniques, but ultimately a block to her own creativity since she wasn't using her own characters. She also never "published" the fan fic on the internet.
So if you want to practice by rewriting LKH, you're fine. No one is going to steal your private notebooks/harddrive. Just don't release the work to the public through any website or LJ or similar.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-29 02:51 am (UTC)If they come off to strong against it, they might have a huge backlash on their hands. But if they sing its praises, they get flooded with the equivalent of ff.net getting dumped at their doorstep.