Why does Anita hunt vampires?
Dec. 14th, 2012 12:10 am![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Why does Anita hunt vampires? Because I don't think we're ever given a reason why. She just does.
She seems very devoted to it,and she also talks about what a tax it is on her soul to have to execute those that are awake, strapped to a gurney, and begging for their lives. So this is a difficult job for not just in that it's a very high-risk and dangerous one, but also very emotionally hard. So why does she keep doing it? What is her motivation? Unlike, say, Buffy or Blade, it's not like she can't get out. They both have special physiologies (better strength, better speed, faster healing etc.) that enable them to better at fighting the vampires in a world where very few people even know these creatures exist and are preying on them, let alone are equipped to deal with them. That's not the case with Anita. Her original animator powers gave her a bit of an edge in terms of evading the mental powers of vampires, but physically she was nothing special, and EVERYONE knows about vampires, there are loads of other executioners out there, etc.
So what made her want to become a vampire slayer?
I've heard it be suggested that maybe she became one just because she felt that having that edge as an animator meant she was morally obligated to use it to protect the populace. I'm not sure I buy it though. Firstly, Anita is so damn selfish. It's not believable to me at all that she loves her harem, so I can't believe the idea she'd care enough about people she's never met to put her life on the line for them. And even if I could buy that she started for that reason, what about why she continued even when she claims it was so tough on her to kill like she did? I don't believe it was actually tough on her at all, personally, but let's just say that what LKH is trying to portray is in fact the truth, that Anita really is a hero, that this really does tear her up, etc. What prompts her to keep doing it?
I think she just wants a license to kill. In the early books, there are times where she seems to almost hate vampires, see them as all dangerous monsters, etc. In the later books, she alternates between 'they're monsters!' and 'they're people!' depending on who she's talking to; basically, whatever position the other person has, Anita takes the opposite one and is portrayed as being right every time in comparison to the other person and LKH doesn't seem to realize she's flip-flopping all the time at all. But no reason as to why she would feel hostile to vampires as she does is ever given. I draw two conclusions from this:
1) Anita just likes to argue with people, make them feel bad for their beliefs, and feel superior
and
2) Anita doesn't actually believe in either position, because she doesn't care enough to take a side. She's just a power-obsessed murderous sociopath who wants to pretend she's a hero, so she takes a position that will allow her to kill people and be 'right' for it.
While I was reading Skin Trade, she said over and over that she was a government-sanctioned assassin, that vampires could be killed legally for very minor things, that she was a serial killer in her own way, and so on. And LKH tried to make her sound brooding and grimdark, but she came off as both whiny and insincere. She sounded more like she was relishing talking about this stuff so much I could just imaging LKH's inner glee as she wrote this over HOW COOL IT IS and HOW COOL ANITA IS and she just can't stop it from bleeding into Anita's words and tone instead of actually trying to look at it from the POV of someone who really was like that, really did those things, really was jaded and wounded, etc.
So, what say you? Does Anita have a reason for being an executioner that you can recall? Do you think she does it because of her animator edge, a desire to kill without reproach, both, neither, something else? Why did she start? Why does she continue? And do you think SHE even believes what LKH has her spout just to spite people?
She seems very devoted to it,and she also talks about what a tax it is on her soul to have to execute those that are awake, strapped to a gurney, and begging for their lives. So this is a difficult job for not just in that it's a very high-risk and dangerous one, but also very emotionally hard. So why does she keep doing it? What is her motivation? Unlike, say, Buffy or Blade, it's not like she can't get out. They both have special physiologies (better strength, better speed, faster healing etc.) that enable them to better at fighting the vampires in a world where very few people even know these creatures exist and are preying on them, let alone are equipped to deal with them. That's not the case with Anita. Her original animator powers gave her a bit of an edge in terms of evading the mental powers of vampires, but physically she was nothing special, and EVERYONE knows about vampires, there are loads of other executioners out there, etc.
So what made her want to become a vampire slayer?
I've heard it be suggested that maybe she became one just because she felt that having that edge as an animator meant she was morally obligated to use it to protect the populace. I'm not sure I buy it though. Firstly, Anita is so damn selfish. It's not believable to me at all that she loves her harem, so I can't believe the idea she'd care enough about people she's never met to put her life on the line for them. And even if I could buy that she started for that reason, what about why she continued even when she claims it was so tough on her to kill like she did? I don't believe it was actually tough on her at all, personally, but let's just say that what LKH is trying to portray is in fact the truth, that Anita really is a hero, that this really does tear her up, etc. What prompts her to keep doing it?
I think she just wants a license to kill. In the early books, there are times where she seems to almost hate vampires, see them as all dangerous monsters, etc. In the later books, she alternates between 'they're monsters!' and 'they're people!' depending on who she's talking to; basically, whatever position the other person has, Anita takes the opposite one and is portrayed as being right every time in comparison to the other person and LKH doesn't seem to realize she's flip-flopping all the time at all. But no reason as to why she would feel hostile to vampires as she does is ever given. I draw two conclusions from this:
1) Anita just likes to argue with people, make them feel bad for their beliefs, and feel superior
and
2) Anita doesn't actually believe in either position, because she doesn't care enough to take a side. She's just a power-obsessed murderous sociopath who wants to pretend she's a hero, so she takes a position that will allow her to kill people and be 'right' for it.
While I was reading Skin Trade, she said over and over that she was a government-sanctioned assassin, that vampires could be killed legally for very minor things, that she was a serial killer in her own way, and so on. And LKH tried to make her sound brooding and grimdark, but she came off as both whiny and insincere. She sounded more like she was relishing talking about this stuff so much I could just imaging LKH's inner glee as she wrote this over HOW COOL IT IS and HOW COOL ANITA IS and she just can't stop it from bleeding into Anita's words and tone instead of actually trying to look at it from the POV of someone who really was like that, really did those things, really was jaded and wounded, etc.
So, what say you? Does Anita have a reason for being an executioner that you can recall? Do you think she does it because of her animator edge, a desire to kill without reproach, both, neither, something else? Why did she start? Why does she continue? And do you think SHE even believes what LKH has her spout just to spite people?
no subject
Date: 2012-12-14 10:35 pm (UTC)Actually, in Skin Trade, when a regular police officer mentions having to answer to his supervisor, Anita monologues to us about how super-cool feds like herself don't have to "answer to their hierarchy much" because the U.S. Marshals Service didn't like how they were "grafted on". Because not liking someone means not requiring them to answer for anything they do, apparently? And then we get a page on how "our warrants of execution were the only paperwork" because back when they had to fill out reports "the details were so grim, so disturbing" that it was decided that the stuff the preternatural branch does shouldn't be "immortalized on paper." Yup, so darkity-dark grim-dark that not even the feds, who work with all the horrible things that humans do to each other, can handle it, so she gets out of all the boring parts of the job. I'm serious.
no subject
Date: 2012-12-15 06:22 am (UTC)If I was in charge of people like Anita, Edward, and Olaf, I'd be documenting EVERYTHING. And I'd make THEM document EVERYTHING, right down to how they feel when they first wake up in the morning. And I'd want to know all about the eighty unaccounted for minutes in Anita's report during which twelve people 'disappeared'/turned up dead/were raped.
I'd have many, many questions. And if I disliked the answers, being fired would be the very least of her/their worries.
Also, LKH has probably never read a true trial transcript. If they're willing to let the public read the specifics of Defendant X's case, a man who was accused of torturing his victims and then beheading them with his own shoes laces when they got boring or the police were too close (true case, by the way), then the staking of a slavering vamp isn't going to be very hush-hush.
If a career field has no paperwork, I'm going to go out on a limb and say that the people who work in that field don't get paper warrants of execution, either. Those people also don't get to be acknowledged as the Tuffest in the Land. In fact, if they're VERY good, I imagine no one ever even knows that they were there.
no subject
Date: 2012-12-15 05:42 pm (UTC)They are indeed answerable to someone in the US Marshalls hierarchy. Everyone in law enforcement is answerable to some one. Everyone else needs to document their time spent in the field and there's no real reason why sanctioned vampire hunters shouldn't have reports to file like everyone else.
no subject
Date: 2012-12-15 10:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-15 10:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-16 11:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-15 10:40 pm (UTC)And this, I suspect, explains a lot of the AB-verse's 'rules.'
(But, as a side note, I'd love mountains of paperwork for vampire hunters.
no subject
Date: 2012-12-16 12:34 am (UTC)Preeetty much, alas
no subject
Date: 2012-12-16 08:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-16 11:13 am (UTC)OH and incidentally when has Anita ever met anything 'hard' that she DIDN'T want to do. :-P
no subject
Date: 2012-12-16 02:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-16 11:17 am (UTC)