[identity profile] saucyirishlass.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] lkh_lashouts
One of the arguments I have been a part of is how Anitaverse rules have been broken so that Laurell can turn Laurita into the most powerfulest, speshulest necrophiliac necromancer EVAR. One of the most blatant broken rules is that you cannot be a lycanthrope (or therianthrope, for amamelina) and vampire at the same time. Someone countered by pointing out the Mother of All Darkness was both.

Now, I'm completely convinced that Laurell invented the Mother of All Darkness just to be a precedent so she'd have an excuse to make Laurita all-powerful. And I'm ignoring the whole immunity-to-diseases-when-you're-a-human-servant fuck-up. My question is, does anyone remember if a vampire (who would obviously know about Marmée Noire) in a past book ever stated that you cannot be both?

Date: 2007-04-18 11:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] summersdream.livejournal.com
The whole series is sort of working itself into one big Anne Rice trainwreck. With Anita standing in as Lestat... now she's the chosen one of Not!Akasha, soon she's going to start a band and face down the Council, switch bodies with some random guy, turn gay and seduce a witch, decide between heaven and hell, and then she'll go back and live with Micah and Nathaniel. Not necesarily all in that order. Or something.

Though I'll be quite happy if at some point Asher and Not!Claudia throw Anita into a swamp and leave her for dead.

Date: 2007-04-19 07:43 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pandaemonaeum.livejournal.com
LOL!

She'd only come back though, and tell them they'd been really, really naughty!

Profile

lkh_lashouts: (Default)
LKH Lashouts

January 2023

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 7th, 2026 06:22 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios