Lover of Snark
Oct. 21st, 2007 06:05 pm![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Hello, new member here. I recently got myself roped into LKH by reading The Harlequin. I wrote a book review about on my own journal and needless to say was curious for more. That book was probably one of the most explicit mainstream porn books I have ever read. LOL! I mean I was just so fasicinated that she would spend so much time on sex.
So I started to read the books from the very beginning and I have to say that while Anita is one MAJOR bitch with mental problems and issues, the books were still good to read.
So anyway, I have to ask you follower snarkers: When was the moment the series Jumping The Shark?
BTW, was I the only one who kinda got the feeling that the author was trying to set the scene for Anita sleeping with Edward's adopted son?
So I started to read the books from the very beginning and I have to say that while Anita is one MAJOR bitch with mental problems and issues, the books were still good to read.
So anyway, I have to ask you follower snarkers: When was the moment the series Jumping The Shark?
BTW, was I the only one who kinda got the feeling that the author was trying to set the scene for Anita sleeping with Edward's adopted son?
no subject
Date: 2007-10-21 10:14 pm (UTC)Narcissus in Chains is my official 'jump the shark' book (and given my user name, I love that term lol) specifically, when Micah forces himself on Anita (this was in hardcover, and it was later changed in the paperback form so that Anita does give consent) After that, there wasn't anything left of the old Anita, and we got this bot-like replacement.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-21 10:36 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Icon love!
From:no subject
Date: 2007-10-22 12:51 am (UTC)*me whimpers under a rock*
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-10-22 12:58 am (UTC)IIRC, she doesn't actually give consent so much a make the nonconsensual aspect of it just that much more ambiguous, which I know some people consider almost more disturbing than her outright protest in the hardcover.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-10-23 09:52 am (UTC)I'll make an exception for Cerulean Sins, though. I thought that one was good if you skipped most of the mad sexing. (Except Asher. It was about damn time Asher got some loving.)
no subject
Date: 2007-10-25 08:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-10-21 10:27 pm (UTC)i guess you'll get a couple of different answers as to when the series jumped the proverbial shark (based on people's preference), but as far as i'm concerned, 'Obsidian Butterfly' was the last good AB book.
then came apocalypse.
and what a wild jump over the shark that one was. it's almost unbelievable that the same person who wrote the books "after" had written the books "before". there's a lot of speculation about the hows and whys.. as you'll see if you decide to catch up on the archives.
how far into the series are you? and do you like the older stuff?
in any case, the brutal devolution of the AB series is a phenomenon to behold. quite unique, actually.. :)
no subject
Date: 2007-10-21 10:57 pm (UTC)It always amuses me how fans get so emotionally invested in these fictional characters like they are real people. Reminds me of the debate going on over at the CSI fandom about GSR and Sara leaving. It's just nuts!
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-10-21 10:32 pm (UTC)Oh, and when you can count the number of partners Anita's hand on both hands... and feet.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-21 11:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-22 12:53 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-10-22 02:16 am (UTC)At first in The Harlequin I skipped over the sex and then reread it and yeah she was more graphic than I had originally thought. The sec scene between her and Richard dragged on forever.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-10-22 05:41 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-10-21 11:37 pm (UTC)Wel, there were a few hippity-hop moments in the original books, but NiC, as others have said, was when Anita went bounding over the wereshark and then had sex with it. All the characters started disintegrating, the plot died, the writing became this horrible purple repetitive mush, and the main character became this bitchy crazy sexbot who likes rape, ultrakinky sex and is rapidly becoming more powerful than God. Yeah, that's a big sharkjump.
poor-toms-acold, I like Narcissus took. He's such a weird, cunning character, and he does not bow to the crotch of doom. (Isn't it sad that the latter is basically a measurement of how bad the characters are to me?)
no subject
Date: 2007-10-22 12:00 am (UTC)LOOOOOL!!!! :)))))
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-10-21 11:43 pm (UTC)No, you're not. Big evidence leaning that way:
1) his appearance is comparable to a young Richard, but he's still young and immature enough for her to be interested in him.
2) he likes violently rough sex, just like Anita.
3) he is sexually traumatized and has deep emotional scars, which all of Anita's penii are as well.
4) he adores her for no reason in particular.
5) Edward is okay with the idea of her fucking his adopted son.
6) The only reason LKH introduces/reintroduces male characters into the series is for sexx0rs with Anita. ID was especially bad in that regard, introducing two new vampire characters who do absolutely nothing but have sex with Anita.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-10-22 04:49 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-10-22 01:53 am (UTC)yeah...
no subject
Date: 2007-10-22 09:10 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-10-22 01:53 am (UTC)So. Very. Sad.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-22 04:09 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Jumping the Shark
Date: 2007-10-22 06:51 am (UTC)Oh, Ctrl_issue,the picture, I must thank you from the blast from the past. Guess what my favorite cartoon when I was five was?
Re: Jumping the Shark
Date: 2007-10-22 02:11 pm (UTC)And yeah, I'd say that it started jumping even before that, way back in Burnt Offerings, when she was able to spit magic in that one guy's face. But you know what? She's never done it again. *shakes head* Also, you'd think that as vampires, they'd get tired of sex and murder after a time. I mean, there are only so many ways you can do either...
no subject
Date: 2007-10-22 01:21 pm (UTC)And then we get to NiC and have Anita actually raped - and I don't care how it got rewritten, she was raped - and then decide her rapist was her One True Love (or one of her one true loves, anyway.) We're over the shark and speeding towards the sunset on the back of a sea turtle. Everything after that is just dreck. CS was a joke - three chapters of plot v endless pages of sex, angst and angsty sex. Micah was a rip-off - as if we needed any more information on his giant wang. It was a poor attempt on LKH's part to make us adore the new speshulbesthappylovetime man in her ... oops, Anita's life. ID, I couldn't even read. After the whole rainmaker scene, I threw it across my room and left it there for six months before selling it on.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-22 02:52 pm (UTC)After that, things really fell apart -- I...I have no words for the stupid of Burnt Offerings, or the total lack of follow-up on the matter, and Blue Moon is full of WTFery that again gets no follow-up -- and it was painfully apparent with OB -- because I maintain that after you've killed a fucking god, it's really hard to come up with a new worst Big Bad to defeat. Just look at Buffy if you want more proof of the theory in action.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-22 02:52 pm (UTC)Bad, bloodthirsty Executioner betrays a man who treats her with respect, for the vampire who blackmailed and manipulated her throughout their entire relationship because she gets grossed out? The same woman who picked through dead bodies and gutted a captive man? No. Way.
That was the first of the endless excuses for her descent into skankitude.