[identity profile] missingvolume.livejournal.com
Just got my Goodreads newsletter and one of the nice features is it tells you who has stuff coming out that you have read before. Well I have to admit this one jumped out at me and my first thought was a short story that is just now coming out in eformat but one of the links calls it Anita Blake #20.5 . Amazon and BN.com don't have any item description about it and LKH's site doesn't say anything about it either. On the Amazon chat boards someone linked to this one tweet about it. 
https://twitter.com/#!/LKHamilton/statuses/157876590729105409
 This short story is making me all philosophical about love, beauty, reality, truth, & how well meaning lies can screw you up for life.


So do you think it is part of Hit List or Kiss the Dead and just a money grab or some scenes she had to cut out and decided to make some extra cash off it? 
[identity profile] dwg.livejournal.com
Interview with LKH @ Fantasy Book Review - this is for the paperback release of Hit List, so a lot of this information we got the first time round back in June.

However, the lack of self-awareness in this part is making my mind slowly retreat to the back of my skull:
Do you think that Anita is tempted to cross over to the dark side?

‘I think dark and light aren’t as far apart as most people think, and that the day you stop wondering about your choices, and if it makes you a good person, or a bad one, is the day you cross the line. Most people don’t become evil in large spectacular events, but little by little, day by day, one small decision at a time, until one day they aren’t the good guy anymore, and most of them don’t even realize it. That Anita worries about it is a good sign that it’s not happened, and probably won’t. Power is like a gun, it’s neutral; it’s the hand that wields it that makes it good, or evil.’
And yet, I'd hold up Flirt as a masterpiece of how Anita's gone to the Dark Side and has become the thing she says she's always hated. What with the whole enslavement and violation thing. But no! Because she angsts about it and has flocks of supporting cast ready to tell her that she's a good person, it's all totally okay! EUGH, I can feel my skin starting to crawl all over again.

She talks more about how she doesn't read much genre fiction, how Merry/Anita are "strong, sexually liberated" women, and how she's always loved the supernatural but isn't sure why.
[identity profile] dwg.livejournal.com
Back in June, LKH did a radio interview with Michelle Wargo for Heartbeat Radio. The podcast is now available, but the audio is a bit iffy in places and Hamilton speaks very fast in others. So because of that, and just in case it goes down, I've transcribed the entire thing. The only editing I've done is to take out a lot of "uh" and "um" pauses and stammering, the rest of the changes mid-sentence are all on LKH.

The interview itself is 14mins of mostly recycled answers, like what is the world of Anita Blake, but there's a new story about how the books are so good that they're an aphrodisiac and some people orgasm just from reading them.

Transcription here. )
[identity profile] dwg.livejournal.com
There's an interview with LKH by the Examiner: "Laurell K Hmailton discusses 'Hit List', Anita Blake and New Orleans - where it's announced she's the Special Guest Author at Anne Rice's Vampires Ball this year (Oct 29 - if anyone is going, please give us a report!)

Here's the interview part: )
[identity profile] dwg.livejournal.com
This link popped up on Twitter a couple of days ago, I've only just now gotten around to watching it: Adam Curry interviews LKH (I've been trying to get an embed code, but no luck!)

It's 26mins of general chatter with some Hit List promo thrown in there, sadly none of it that you haven't heard before. So, get out your bingo cards, Lashers! I'm paraphrasing here, but these are the highlights:
  • "I pioneered the genre!" (inb4 Buffy!)
  • "Vampires are the new Prince Charming"
  • "The people who hate the books are still buying them!" with an added "And the people hate the books read them more closely than those who say they love them." (Which I thought was a lovely way to flip off pretty much everyone)
  • Claims she's one of the first to have created vampires that can have sex with an "I have a biology degree!" bonus
  • No, there won't be any tv show/movie because she cannot understand how a full length novel can be "winnowed" down to 120-ish pages of a script. ("What do you take out?" It's like she doesn't understand that all the pages spent on description can easily be summed up with a couple of visuals)
  • She does not watch the Vampire Diaries/True Blood or reads anything within her genre.
  • Apparently she has the highest "rate" of male fans in her genre (with maybe an exception of Charlaine Harris' Southern Vampire books thanks to True Blood). I think she means percentage, but...uh, okay.
It's kinda nice that Adam Curry isn't a fanboy in this and asks questions without gushing too much. I really wish that LKH didn't just recycle the same answers she's been giving for at least the last five years for every interview/podcast that I've managed to get my hands on. I get that she's probably been asked a lot of these questions before, but that doesn't mean she has to give answers like predictive text.

But I sort of wish she'd do more interviews/podcasts, because she has got a lot more charisma in person than what gets across in blogs/social media. It's far more pleasant to listen to this than to read about it, even if I still wind up rolling my eyes and shaking my head in quiet despair.
[identity profile] dwg.livejournal.com
I spent two weeks or so breaking my brain with this book, trying to pick at the Gordian Knot of repetitive prose to get to whatever the hell happened. The thing about the book is, when it’s not on an endless loop of asking, “what does that mean?” then we’re treated to Anita’s special brand of sexism, continuity errors, and the story meandering like a wayward zombie in desperate search of brains. It’s really hard to find the funny, but by cutting out most of the crap I found that what’s left is highlights how a) not very much happens, and b) what does happen is ridiculous.

Why can't we be reading about Edward the vampire hunter? )
[identity profile] naeko.livejournal.com



More important to get home than to save the day? That's a terrible concept for a main character.

"What? Save the day? Nah. I''d rather just get home; staying might risk my life!"

No one should be writing books about a character who just wants to "get milk and go home." Books about characters who are not working toward something interesting end up being not interesting. This video doesn't say, "My book is going to be fun and exciting!" It says, "My main character has turned into a rather selfish coward."
[identity profile] fadeinthewash.livejournal.com
Amazon has a cover for Hit List posted now.

Into the cut for pic )

It seems that the experiment in "scary sharp implements on a grainy colored background" covers is over. We've moved back into softcore porn imagery, but the oh-so-grungy splotchy-colors motif remains. As someone in the Amazon discussion thread said, this actually looks kind of generic...or like a Dan Brown or Stephen King novel. Lashers, what do you think?

Tangentially, I wonder what year that quote from Charlaine Harris was made in, or if she were being sarcastic at the time.

Profile

lkh_lashouts: (Default)
LKH Lashouts

January 2023

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 7th, 2025 10:34 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios