[identity profile] rodentfanatic.livejournal.com
I wanted to post some of my headcanon (some of which I think I've posted in the past, but most of it I haven't posted here before) and it breaks a big headcanon rule: It contradicts canon. Headcanon is not supposed to do that. It's supposed to be stuff never stated in canon (hence why it's something your own head came up with) but that wouldn't contradict it if it was. For instance, it's never stated in HP canon that Sirus Black an Remus Lupin were in love, but it was never stated they weren't and there weren't reasons they couldn't be, so it's a headcanon a lot of people have. However, when it comes to the very special case that is the AB series, canon is, in my opinion, basically pick-and-choose for the reader after Narcissus in Chains, because that is where shit starts getting ridiculous. Hence why some of my statements aren't about headcanon so much as whether I do or don't accept a certain part of the post-NiC canon.

Read more )
[identity profile] rodentfanatic.livejournal.com
And once again, my brain has been ticking, and I wondered if anyone had any answers (or just ideas, theories, headcanons, etc.) on any of the following:

- I haven't read the book in which Byron appears, but an AB Wiki tells me that he "was turned at 15, but due to bulking up muscle can pass for 18." Is it ever stated in the books whether or not this bulking-up was done before or after death? I swear I got the impression somewhere that he did so AFTER being turned, which has all sorts of interesting implications. Like, if vampires can build muscle, can they lose it? Can they gain or lose fat, maybe by drinking from someone with high blood sugar or cholesterol too often or something like that? If they die bulked-up, do they have to work to maintain that muscle after death, or does anything you died with stay the same and you can only add from there, not lose?

- Why is the rat king/rodere leader called the Rom? What does that mean and how would it relate to rats? The only 'Rom' I know of is the Roma people, and when I searched the term on Wiki, I didn't get any results that seem rat-related.

- How much blood do vampires need to drink? In some parts of the book there's an implication that they don't need much at all, while other parts imply they can potentially kill someone by feeding on them. My guess is that while they may only need a bit, some go way overboard, either because they're assholes or just can't control themselves, but is it ever stating explicitly just what the case is?

- Necromancers can control all types of undead, not just zombies. There's been a lot of focus on Anita controlling vampires, but what about ghosts and ghouls? Ghouls are a type of undead, do ghosts count as such too? And has there been anything on Anita having influence over either since her necromancer powers awakened?

Thoughts

Oct. 11th, 2012 11:47 am
[identity profile] rodentfanatic.livejournal.com
I know, I know, I post here too much. I made myself promise that I'd wait for someone else to post here before I put this up. It's just I love this world and have so many thoughts about it and I love having a bunch of people who can talk back to me about it. Anyway, there's no one topic to this post, rather a bunch of un-related thoughts that I'd like opinions on, since everyone here usually has good/interesting thoughts.

Also, I've been sporking Skin Trade for some friends...if I were to get a public blog of some type for said sporkings, would anyone here be interested in following?
There's a LOT here )
[identity profile] raven-tiger.livejournal.com
I am quite new to the Anita Blake series. I have been wanting to read them for awhile since I heard how bad they have gotten. I like reading bad!fiction.


There be snark and spoilers behind the cut )

This is my first post here, so if I tagged or titled this entry wrong, please correct me. Thank you!
[identity profile] rodentfanatic.livejournal.com
Just for any general headcanon/fan theories you might have concerning the AB or Merry series!


- Belle Morte uses glamor so that no matter what the current time is, she appears to the eyes of others as being the epitome of the current beauty standards. And the reason that Anita sees her as looking notably like Anita is because to Anita, for all her whining about oh noes tall skinny blondes, does indeed consider herself to be the height of female beauty.

- Raina is still around in Anita's head as a munin, and it is her slow, subtle corruption that has made Anita into what she now is

- Or this all just Anita's most ID-level fantasies that she believes are really happening, but actually aren't. It's just Jean-Claude manipulating her mind so he can use her as a pawn.

-Or it's an ongoing delusion due to Anita having contracted some supernatural STD (hey, even just regular syphilis can make you crazy!) and JC is still manipulating it to his ends, in any case, if she isn't in a mental hospital.

- Anne Rice books and the Twilight series and other supernatural-themed books either were never written in the ABverse, or, if they were, do not enjoy at all the same popularity because of the existence of real vampires cutting into the fantasy on a number of levels.

-MELANIE IS STILL FUCKING WAITING AND PLANNING AND GOING TO GET YOU, ANITA. She swore, and immortals probably don't feel a need to get their vengeance fast.

- There is another group of werehyenas in St. Louis, made up of all the females that Narcissus wouldn't let join. Except that's not actually how it happened. He didn't kick them out, they kicked HIM out because he kept stealing their shampoo and high heels.

- While both the tigers and the hyenas are matriarchies, they are matriarchies in very different ways. My headcanon for why tigers are female-ruled is that since they are so rare and so focused on preserving their species, their women became regarded nigh-sacred for their ability to give birth and carry on the bloodlines. And of course that is ultimately sexist against women because it's basing their value on their reproductive ability, but I think that it makes sense for weretigers in this universe, and I think that instead of settling for being exploited as brood mares, the tiger ladies instead decided to grab hold of this idea and use it to their advantage, ultimately resulting in a society where "well, us women are responsible for continuing the species, so it makes sense to have us responsible for the species as a whole, which meanings ruling and making decisions and Mother Knows Best" and probably a lot of emphasis on fertility and creation as power, as women as a life-source, women as the only sex strong enough to have a baby, etc.

But in the case of hyenas, I think it's more instinctual. In the wild, hyenas (as in the actual animal) are female-dominated naturally. Even a male who is larger than a female will usually submit to her without a fight. Since hyenas don't have one mass culture with a history of traditions like tigers do, nor a problem with rareness, I think that every time a new hyena group organizes they just naturally find themselves with the dominant women being in charge by what seems by chance but is in fact their inner instincts, whether they realize it or not, manipulating things in that way. I think that some groups would have no particular views on matriarchy and would instead just accept it, while others would instead take a more Amazonian point of view, emphasizing the strength and power of female hyenas in combat as why they are suited to be in charge of the group, protecting them from threats and leading them in battles, with probably nothing much to say (unlike the tigers) about birth-giving, since it's not going to be an important deal to them as it is with the tigers.
[identity profile] rodentfanatic.livejournal.com
Ok, so, no need to point out how the ladies of the Anitaverse get the short stick in so many ways. However, there are some that we love and are rooting for no matter how much their creator wants us to dislike them. Who are your favorites, and why? Feel free to include characters from the Merry Gentry series as well!
Read more )
[identity profile] watersheerie.livejournal.com
So I vaguely remember LKH saying something about how black people couldn't become vampires due to some sort of bizarre difference in blood. Does anyone know the quotes and book it comes from?

Thanks.
[identity profile] othellia.livejournal.com
I'm not exactly sure when I started becoming a vampire biological analyzer (probably from one of LKH's blogs), but it happened. And then I realized...

There's no good reason for half of the traits that authors give vampires. Even worse is when it comes from authors like LKH, who are convinced that they're doing everything in their power to make their vampires different. (It's especially bad when it comes to LKH, since she seems to be doing everything in her power not to make her characters genetically impossible.)

So, what am I talking about?

1. Why do vampires not have heartbeats? Yes, I know they're dead, but I thought that they were trying to counteract this by drinking blood. I'm not exactly sure for what purpose this blood functions, but based on what I've read it seems to be essentially for keeping the old human functions going. My point? How does the blood get where it's going without a heart to pump it? Am I to imagine that once a vampire drinks blood it just sits there in the veins and stagnates? Because just... eww.

2. Same thing goes for not breathing. Even if vampires don't need to oxygenate their stagnated blood, they still need it to talk and stuff. Even if the vocal cords are vibrating, they're almost pointless if you don't have the air to back it up. And considering the fact that they moan in bed means that the breathing's a habit. (Unless of course their thought process goes something like, "Oh, I feel like moaning. Guess I better breathe then, otherwise it's probably going to come up as a dry rasp.")

A ton of other things come to mind too, but I think these are the ones that annoy me the most and are the consistent throughout most of the urban vampire stuff I pick up now and again. I guess I wouldn't be so annoyed if LKH wasn't like, "MAI BIOLOGEE SKILLZ. LET ME SHOW YOU MY LACK OF THEM."

Any vampire traits you find annoying in Anita Blake/other vampire novels with all the bio babble trying to make the book look edgy?
[identity profile] cheshire-smile.livejournal.com
This is actually a kind of gross thought. It came to me while reading Poppy Z. Brite's Exquisite Corpse. Which, as an aside, is very good until the end. Which sucks.

Cut for General Ickiness )

Profile

lkh_lashouts: (Default)
LKH Lashouts

January 2023

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 22nd, 2025 02:12 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios