[identity profile] dwg.livejournal.com
LKH's Q&A that she held on twitter at @nookBN have been posted! Here's a transcript with links so you don't have to read from bottom to top.

Read more... )
[identity profile] eden-guardian.livejournal.com
So, apparently LKH's next book series is a Space Marine noir story co-authored by husband, Jon, the husband. Any thoughts on this?

https://twitter.com/LKHamilton/status/316226208234864640
https://twitter.com/LKHamilton/status/316227783800000512

Seems like a strange genre for her to tackle. But, maybe something fresh will do her some good? Especially, considering how she's unable to write the Merry series anymore. And she'll probably burn fast only writing Anita books, beit short stories or novels.
[identity profile] dwg.livejournal.com
Four days previously, LKH announced that the next book would be called Dead Sexy. The masses rejoiced or groaned and rolled their eyes. The very next day, I received a missive from the forum in the form of a newsletter that spake thus:
One of the more exciting things that has happened is that we got the announcement from Laurell herself of the title for the Anita Blake book that she is currently writing. Per Laurell, Anita Blake book 21 will be titled “Dead Sexy”. Hmmm that brings so many things to mind, I can hardly wait to see what has been happening for Anita and her cohorts. I don’t know about you guys, but I can hardly wait until June, 2012.
Even Amazon updated its records to reflect this (please mark your calendars for June 5 2012).

Mere days afterward, all that we knew was about to change:



[source]

And lo, my Twitter search field went into meltdown and I felt as though I stepped to the edge of the precipice. Roughly half the votes were "Dead Sexy! The other one makes me think of rotting corpses and necrophilia, not nummy vampires! Possibly disturbed morticians." while the other half replied, "Kiss the Dead! The other one sounds like a romance novel! A bad one. And a bit Charlaine Harris." And this, my friends, is what it feels like to stare into the Abyss.

I was weak. I couldn't take it any longer. My body yearned for respite, so I fled and fell into the welcome arms of slumber in the hopes that I would awaken to a better, brighter world.

Alas:



[source]

IT IS DECIDED. Look upon your new title with awe and terror.

Unless it changes again between now and publication. Whatever, I'm still going to be disappointed if there's no necrophilia in this book. I have expectations now. Vampires probably count, but...we've done that already.

Let the new discussions commence! And tags shall be updated accordingly.
[identity profile] dwg.livejournal.com
Fresh-ish from Twitter:



[source]

Um, okay? (inb4 necrophilia jokes! *points to icon*) I'm a bit torn on this, on the one hand this fits with LKH's new thing of "just pick stuff that sounds cool!" title-wise since Blood Noir but on the other...it is so incredibly generic. "Dead Sexy" is the title of a book where I'd ask who it's by and be honestly surprised to find LKH's name attached to it. But the more I think about it, the more it does seem to fit with the titles that have come since Skin Trade, and then I start to get a bit irritated that this is a title that blends in with all the others and doesn't even try to be different. At least you could point to something like Blood Noir and go "that's an Anita Blake book. No, I don't get it either, but she has books called Cerulean Sins and Obsidian Butterfly. It was a great day for spelling at my bookstore when I was placing orders."

"Dead Sexy" makes me want to write a story about what I wish the book was about and pretend that was the actual thing rather than whatever LKH is going to give us.

Tweet flog

Jul. 21st, 2011 03:06 pm
[identity profile] dwg.livejournal.com
Right, little bit of a preamble here: there's this blog called Terrible Minds and the author has a 25 things a writer should know series that's both a hilarious and informative read. The most recent is 25 Ways to Defeat The Dreaded Writers Block, and naturally this sparked a discussion with a friend re: LKH in that she claims she doesn't get it (except for when she does, but it's not her fault because it's the muse that's eluding her). She's given advice in the past on how to overcome this, but it either comes across as incredibly condescending like, "what fools you mortals be! I do not suffer from such trivialities!" or "I'm possessed by this mysterious otherworldly source!"

And then this happened to pretty much prove my point:



[link]

Way to be insulting to everyone in 140 characters or less. )

EDIT 29/7: This post, along with [livejournal.com profile] naomi_jay's Open Letter to Laurell K Hamilton have been referenced in Jennifer Armintrout's blog over here. We're internet famous-ish? Raise your glasses!

Tweet Flog

Dec. 18th, 2010 08:23 am
[identity profile] naeko.livejournal.com



Wow. Talk about being humble, LKH.

Most of what she says is amusing enough in its backwards nature that I just find it funny and maybe worth a little teasing. Then, sometimes, her ego shines through and I have to fight myself not to indulge in the skull-cracking headdesk I think is deserved.

Technically prolific just means 'producing a lot' and, while that may have been true in the years Hamilton put out three books, I think even that is stretching it, now.

Then again, I guess you could have a prolific amount of dog poop, so maybe I'm mistakenly trying to put qualifiers on quality, when that's not the issue. Does a large quantity of bad sex scenes still make her prolific?
[identity profile] dwg.livejournal.com
I posted this on my journal first, so I'm sorry to the people who get this twice, but! News fresh in from Twitterland! So fresh, rigor hasn't even set in!
LKHamilton: I've finished crying over my imaginary friends, but I'm left empty and sort of numb. Stunned with the turn of events. Jan 18 8:44

LKHamilton: I've spent days trying to save this character. I pulled a major metaphysical event to save the day & in the end not enough. Jan 18 8:46

LKHamilton: Death will come, final and complete, and the light in their eyes dulls until the windows to the soul show nothing but emptiness. Jan 18 8:47

LKHamilton: The body is still warm, the flesh still soft, you can still hold them, cradle them in your arms and smell the sweet scent of their skin. Jan 18 8:49

LKHamilton: Death comes soft at first, lay a last kiss on their mouth while the warmth lasts and before the cold comes. Jan 18 8:52

LKHamilon: I'm out of here. I have not the heart to stay. Time to find someone real and get a hug. Should have known what was coming. Sometimes . . . Jan 18 8:55

LKHamilon: . . . even in fiction you can't save everyone. I fucking hate that. Jan 18 8:56
SOMEONE IS GOING TO DIE IN BULLET! This is doubly amusing because not three days ago, in a Q & A for Barnes and Noble, she said this:
Ok, this is a spoiler if you haven't at least finished Guilty Pleasures then please do not read this message. Ok, I've done the warning bit. Anita and I were both traumatized by Phillip's death in Guilty Pleasures. I promised her after that if she cared for a man I wouldn't kill him off. Her way of getting around that was apparently to care for every man we met in the books from that point on. Talk about unforeseen consequences.
 
I honestly think my subconscious is responsible for the low death count among major and major/minor characters. People dieing, or leaving, when I was very young have left their mark. In real life you can't save everyone, but in fiction, sometimes, you can. We may actually have some deaths at some point, but I think my muse and I would rather not.
Bold emphasis is mine.

I was talking to a couple of people over the weekend and saying that if LKH wanted to keep things as real-to-life as possible, as she claims she does, then she'd have to let some characters die. In my opinion, you can't really have it both ways; either you keep things gritty and real and deal with the tough breaks the story gives you, or you can make it a fancy fictional la-la land where nobody dies and everyone's sparkly and happy. Trying to fudge one just hurts the other, and...well, the books are a really good example to that with the random metaphysics and miraculous saves. So it's nice to see that someone's biting the Bullet.

Umm, on a related note, I went through the B & N forum and copied out the Q & A in more readable format, so that LKH's answers are right after the question and you don't have to scroll around to try and find what she's talking about: Part one and part two. I'm sorting through the Facebook chat in a similar fashion, but I'm going to add more blog links and commentary to it.

Tweet Flog

Jan. 6th, 2010 01:47 am
[identity profile] naeko.livejournal.com
@kohning We discuss that they had sex off stage a lot more than on stage. I can't possible show on stage every time Anita & lover have sex

Posted 1-5-10 from TweetDeck


But, dammit, she will try!

I really wish that, instead of just realizing she "can't possibly" show every time Anita has sex, she'd go the opposite route and put a cap on the amount of sex shown in each book. Twice per book, maybe, just to ease herself in. Then, put a limit on how many people gain something from sex; once per book is probably something she could handle, but I'd like it to be once every third book. Really, let's face it, no book should have more than one scene in which someone gains phenomenal cosmic power (iiiitty bitty living space) from having sex. Having that happen once per book in a long series is just ridiculous. I don't want to hear about anymore of Anita's boy toys gaining power from making her scream. It's not only unseemly, it's also boring. Characters that can always power up from having sex with Anita are not interesting.

"I can't open this pickle jar!"
"Just have sex with Anita."
[several minutes later] "Pickle acquired! NOM NOM NOM!"

(No pun intended, but that was awesome)

A complete lack of struggle is not interesting. I don't understand why anyone would want to read books in which the characters just live their lives without doing anything new or different. The sex in the ABVH series has become as routine and boring as reading about a character washing the dishes.

I was also thinking about how, with all the power that Anita just- ah- hands out, willy nilly (Where is Willy, anyway! Did he pack up his fuzzy dice and leave town quietly?), don't you think this sort of thing would get out? Don't you think that there are even just humans out there who have their fingers in supernatural pies who have probably heard about this magical, rotating door of power? Edward can't be the only sociopath out there who plays well when the monsters when it serves him well.

I'd like to see some Microsoft-sized President/CEO/whatever businessman take notice of all the powers Anita is handing out and decide that he wants that for himself. He could send in a few lowly vampires/werewolves/Frankensteins/Mummies/whatever to test the waters. Then, when he's sure what he hears is legitimate, he could get guys like Edward to blow Anita's stronghold to bits while she and JC or she and Micah are out on a date. Then, when all her whiny friends are blowed up by bombs with silver and holy water shrapnel, he should kidnap Anita and keep her tied up so that he can power up every day at Rape O'Clock!

But, no. Nothing this interesting/unpleasant would ever happen in the Anitaverse. Boo.

Tweet Flog

Dec. 5th, 2009 12:25 pm
[identity profile] naeko.livejournal.com
I've actually been in line with perfect X-mas gift for Anita. Realized that she's not real & I couldn't give it to her. :)
Sent from TweetDeck in reply to mandimoore0502

I've also almost bought gifts for other characters, but you can't give your imaginary friends gifts. No way to mail them.
Sent from TweetDeck in reply to mandimoore0502


Aww, Hamilton. Why are you still saying these things? You could be perfectly sane and of sound mind, but this sort of stuff makes me picture you wandering around aimlessly, unsure of what's going on or who you are. It makes me want to pat you on the head and give you a chew toy. I know that you like people to think of you as being ~connected~ to your characters, but this is not the way to go about doing so. Just stop :(

I sometimes wonder if she subconsciously says things about how the characters are her fraaaands because she wants people to stop being mean to them. Anita and Team Sex can't defend themselves because they're not real. While we look at this like, "Well, they're not real, so I can call them all stupid and not hurt their feelings." Hamilton might have begin to think, "If I make them real, people will be nice to them!" It's probably just that Anita is such (no, fingers not 'suck;' nice one, though) an extension of Hamilton that she can't bear to see people being mean to her, but who knows.

Tweet Flog

Nov. 9th, 2009 07:12 pm
[identity profile] naeko.livejournal.com
Thanks for the compliments on our more humble food. :) J & I can cook, but @thechickenchic treats food the way I treat words.
Posted about 7:50pm PST from TweetDeck

I can't help but feel amused as hell by this. I know Hamilton means this as a compliment, but it so, so isn't. I laughed and read that aloud to my husband who responded with, "... she feeds Hamilton like a momma bird- regurgitating crap directly into her mouth? She has only three ingredients that she uses over and over? She serves a plate full of unseasoned mashed potatoes and calls it a full, gourmet meal?"

I feel sorry for that food. It's like when I see a book that says something along the lines of "Fans of LKH will love this!" The publisher thinks they're doing the book a favor but, really... no. Just no. Seeing that, I know immediately that it will not be a good book. So far, I haven't been let down by this philosophy.

Profile

lkh_lashouts: (Default)
LKH Lashouts

January 2023

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 29th, 2025 08:22 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios