LKH Lashouts

I have shot many holes in many pieces of paper and I can tell you that that is a wide spread and nothing particularly special. The only pattern is a tendency to the lower left. Also, for new firearm purposes, the 5 bullseye targets with groups of ten holes in the paper is a better gauge of how it handles and what adjustments need to be made (particularly with regards to the sights) IMO.

It's a mountain out of a molehill again. :P

From:

This, thank you. Also I notice there's no mention of distance.

From:

There's a lot not mentioned. Rapid fire clusters can look different than shots taken with pauses.

I'd be kind of disappointed in a target that looks like that though, but that could be just me.

From:

You're not alone; it wouldn't have been the target I picked to brag about. I get the feeling she has pretty low standards for marksmanship.

From:

Agreed...I had better clusters with a 22 first time shooting, that looks like she just pointed and shot rather than actually took the time to shoot a clip, check the target, adjust the sights adjust her stance/grip and try again to see how it handled for HER.

From:

To me it looks like the gunsights weren't used at all, that maybe they were just unloading the clip as fast as possible. Which can be fun after everything has been appropriately adjusted.

From:

If you're going to do that, though, why not get a fun target? Like some milk jugs filled with water. Unloading into a paper target is pretty meh.

From:

If they were at an indoor range they might not be able to do that, my brother and parents have gotten creative with paper targets. Like Joffery for example....

From:

Ah, good point. I grew up in the sticks and forget sometimes that not everyone has enough land out back to put up a big dirt pile and plink to their heart's content.

From:

Right now, with all the gun violence going on in the nation and the growing controversy over concealed carry (and the open carry people bringing assault rifles into Target and other locations), I...just feel sick looking at this. I know Laurell's not a danger to anyone. I know there's nothing wrong with practicing with firearms recreationally, or being fascinated by the various types of firearms, their design, their history. But right now, just in context...this leaves a bad taste in my mouth. I may be in the minority, though. There's really no reason to make an association between one author being harmlessly twee about how badass she is and the complete clusterfuck we're going through as a nation. Maybe I'm just more sensitive because where I live--Chicago--over a hundred people have been shot in the past week, 15 or more of them dead. So I'm twitchy.

From:

cekhmet.livejournal.com

I agree. Guns always make me feel gross. This isn't the wild west anymore, civilians don't need them and I don't get the fascination at all.

From:

I don't either. Then again, I'm paranoid about guns. I had a gun shoved in my face in a public area in broad daylight several years ago, with a guy calling me a fucking faggot and threatening to shoot me for my laptop bag, and right now I live in a gangbanger neighborhood where that innocent schoolkid standing on the corner might just have a gun in his backpack. So I always assume my response is my own extreme aversion due to these things, but I'm glad I'm not the only one who just...feels ick about them.

From:

As a first hand witness to a family whose recently decided to learn to shoot and handle firearms, I can understand it, they are cool they come in so many ranges sizes and types and it's interesting to see how one kind handles over another. However my father decided rather than going for the big mean guns, went for the antique replicas and is getting involved with Cowboy Trick Shooting/Reinacting instead. I haven't seen him this excited about a hobby in a decade.

But he never tries to carry them where they are not needed, all guns are kept locked up and the ammo locked in a separate location in the house, and is as disgusted with the rare few who are making the sensible gun owners look bad.

From:

lliira (from livejournal.com)

And the wild west wouldn't have been the wild west if not for 1) guns and 2) the attempted genocide of Native Americans, which fueled gun culture.

I hate guns. I grew up among people who hunted; one of them was killed with a gun while hunting at 13 years old. People who kill people with guns might (might) attack others anyway, but they would not be able to injure nearly as many people if they didn't have guns, let alone kill them. Guns are far deadlier than fists or knives. It's strange to me how so many people in the U.S. like to pretend technology doesn't matter when it comes to firearms.

From:

subtle-shades.livejournal.com

I definitely think your feelings towards guns are a matter of your personal/family culture. My personal/family culture is very different from yours so I'm fine with the idea of people owning guns or carrying concealed. (Although the people bringing assault rifles into Target are just being juvenile and in-your-face about something that really shouldn't be a big deal - and isn't a big deal in other parts of the country where people have guns, we all know they have them, and no one feels the need to flash them around.)

And I'd argue that how you view the "context" of the current gun issues in this country also depends on what parts of the country you "tend to think of" when you're framing your arguments. There are still places in this country where you absolutely need a gun because help really is that far away. Or your luck is really that monumentally bad. And there are socioeconomic levels/pockets in the U.S. where people actually do still mostly survive off of what they can hunt/kill. They can't afford to do anything else.

(Although I read an academic paper awhile back positing that it's not the access to guns - because we've always had that - but something that's gone wrong in our culture that's responsible for the current mess in the U.S.. The writer had recently visited (and observed in) a couple of modern, well-populated countries that have an average of as many as one gun for every three people, and those countries simply don't have our levels of gun violence. ONE of those countries had had ONE police shooting in the ENTIRE history of their country and EVERYONE even tangentially involved in the affair was given counseling at the government's expense because it was such a terrible and abhorrent thing in their culture. That the gun-flailing suspect had later DIED had the nation collectively breathing into a paper bag. The writer contrasted that with New York's police, who will absolutely shoot into a crowd of unarmed civilians at a fleeing suspects - and, at the time of the writing, there had been two such incidents within a single week.

But, assuming that the paper-writer was right, there MAY be something between the tendency of some people to ostentatiously flail and flash their weapons and the current amounts and types of gun violence in various parts of the U.S.)

From:

...you might be making some assumptions about my personal/family culture that are incorrect. I live in Chicago now. I didn't always. I grew up in one of those places where we hunted and killed for a living, and my parents are both ex-cops who keep guns in their respective houses. I was raised to shoot a gun; to respect a gun; to respect others in relation to my possession of a firearm. The fact that I choose not to own one now has nothing to do with the culture of family and other values that shaped me, even if my culture in a more strict sense of the word is very not-American. (Not white, socialized in a non-white household that brought in a lot of cultural values from other countries, including a complete confusion as to why anyone would need a gun if it wasn't for their absolute survival or their line of work. For every first-world country you cited with a large number of guns per capita, there are just as many that do fine without and just don't understand the obsession.) And while at the moment, yes, I am thinking of Chicago as far as what sticks out in my mind the most--for the most part I think of it in a national context and as a cultural epidemic.

But I'm also aware it's a personal preference. I'm not advocating to take away people's guns or whatever, just because I don't like them. You don't need to convince me of anything, because I'm not standing in opposition to you, and as I said " I know there's nothing wrong with practicing with firearms recreationally, or being fascinated by the various types of firearms, their design, their history." That also extends to guns as a necessity for survival. I'm just saying that her posting this--on the heels of the Texas shooting--shows a remarkable lack of awareness and raises some issues that make me feel ill.

It is definitely a symptom that something has gone very wrong with our collective culture as a nation. And it won't be fixed until we fix that, instead of just trying to take guns out of the hands of people who would do horrible things with or without them anyway.

From:

subtle-shades.livejournal.com

I think that my assumption - that we have different personal/family cultures - still stands. Based on what you've said, literally the only thing we have in common is growing up in multicultural families that owned guns and taught us the very basics of using them. (Although I find your assumption that "American" = "white" troublesome... as is your assumption that it's uncommon to grow up in a mixed culture household. But then, that's my own background peeking through.)

...and I wasn't actually trying to convince you of anything. I put more effort into arguments/persuasive pieces. I thought it was an interesting tidbit and was sharing it.

But otherwise I probably agree with you?

From:

I don't think American = white. I phrased that poorly, and for that I'm sorry. I've been talking white privilege with one of my friends all day, and talking about racism and the continued divide between white Americans and non-white Americans, plus the varying forms racism takes among non-white Americans themselves--and some of my train of thought probably crept into this inadvertently and led to some muddled phrasing.

We do have very different personal / family cultures; my only disagreement is with your assumption that the culture I come from drives my current discomfort with guns. (And I mean "culture" as in environment more than anything to do with ethnicity or country of origin.) But otherwise, yeah, we're pretty much agreeing. It's more a "live and let live" thing, anyway.

From:

No reasonable folks I know of approve of the open carry people. The last time I checked, Walmart was not a war zone, even during Black Friday.

From:

Yeah, even the NRA was distancing themselves from them. You have people who are against guns, people who are for guns...and then you have batshit crazy that no one can even begin to understand, and that's the open carry people.

From:

Unfortunately, the batshit crazy is what gets all the attention, because honest, considered, and considerate debate doesn't make for snazzy headlines. :(

From:

miss-maggpie.livejournal.com

Urgh. For me, this post is simply: Americans and Guns. It fills me with so much rage. I just....can't even....process LKH....Damn it, why is she always trying to be a badass.

If she's going to do gun crap, fine. People have a right in the US, right? to own guns and safe practice and whatnot. But considering all the gun violence shit the US has been going through since FOREVER, it just feels like poor form. Especially on a professional page. Keep it to your private blog, Laurita.

Sometimes I think she should've been a police officer, or an army officer, considering her gunlust. But then I realise that it might not end so well for her. That'd be a book I would read: Laurita in a real police force.

From:

rodentfanatic.livejournal.com

Oh no no no, LKH in any position of authority sounds TERRIBLE to me...and not just because she's not that great a shot, if the comments above are anything to go by

From:

suzycat.livejournal.com

I hate guns a lot but I could sort-of see this being of professional value if Anita still had anything to do with guns; the early books did seem to have quite a lot of discussion of weaponry.

However, Anita's entire life seems to revolve around shagging various semi-humans these days, not guns, and then there's always the Merry series which doesn't really seem to have been particularly weapony at any time, so Merry fans can reasonably be expected to have no interest in LKH and her husband, Jon, shooting targets.

Given a Merry novel has just come out, I'd expect more posts about hair dye and ways to braid your ankle-length tresses.

From:

rodentfanatic.livejournal.com

Yeah, I don't understand why this is on her professional blog...like most of the things she posts

From: